All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>,
	Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	Clifton Barnes <clifton.a.barnes@gmail.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Guido Martinez <guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder- Add support for absolute encoder
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:14:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573DA70F.70206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573DA29A.1080609@samsung.com>

Hi,

On 05/19/2016 04:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[...]
> On 05/19/2016 11:04 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> index c7fc8d4fb080..8f60289fb6cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> @@ -25,24 +25,29 @@
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>>  #include <linux/property.h>
>> +#include <linux/input-polldev.h>
>>  
>>  #define DRV_NAME "rotary-encoder"
>>  
>>  struct rotary_encoder {
>>  	struct input_dev *input;
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Ifdefs look dirty.

I will drop this.

> 
>> +	struct input_polled_dev *poll_dev;
>> +#endif
>>  	struct mutex access_mutex;
>>  
>>  	u32 steps;
>>  	u32 axis;
>>  	bool relative_axis;
>>  	bool rollover;
>> +	bool absolute_encoder;
>>  
>>  	unsigned int pos;
>>  
>>  	struct gpio_descs *gpios;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>>  
>> -	unsigned int *irq;
>> +	int *irq;
>>  
>>  	bool armed;
>>  	signed char dir;	/* 1 - clockwise, -1 - CCW */
>> @@ -67,6 +72,21 @@ static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_state(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  	return ret & 3;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(struct rotary_encoder
>> +						   *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	unsigned int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < encoder->gpios->ndescs; ++i) {
>> +		int val = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(encoder->gpios->desc[i]);
>> +
>> +		ret = ret << 1 | val;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void rotary_encoder_report_event(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  {
>>  	if (encoder->relative_axis) {
>> @@ -178,6 +198,72 @@ out:
>>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void rotary_encoder_setup_input_params(struct rotary_encoder  *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	struct input_dev *input = encoder->input;
>> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(encoder->dev);
>> +
>> +	input->name = pdev->name;
>> +	input->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
>> +	input->dev.parent = encoder->dev;
>> +
>> +	if (encoder->relative_axis)
>> +		input_set_capability(input, EV_REL, encoder->axis);
>> +	else
>> +		input_set_abs_params(input,
>> +				     encoder->axis, 0, encoder->steps, 0, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t rotary_absolute_encoder_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct rotary_encoder *encoder = dev_id;
>> +	unsigned int state;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
>> +
>> +	state = rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(encoder);
>> +	if (state != encoder->last_stable) {
>> +		input_report_abs(encoder->input, encoder->axis, state);
>> +		input_sync(encoder->input);
>> +		encoder->last_stable = state;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
> 
> 1. Double mutex_lock()? Oh, that is weird. Please document it at least
> in form of lockdep annotations.
> 
> 2. Maybe that should be unlock? Did you test this code?
> 

Sorry... this should have been unlock.
I dont have a h/w with rotary-encoder hooked to IRQ line. It would be
much appreciated if someone with rotary-encoder hooked up to h/w IRQ
line test this patch.

>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Same here and later in the code, ifdefs look dirty.

Ok, I will remove #ifdefs and directly select INPUT_POLLDEV when
INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER is selected.

-- 
Regards
Vignesh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: vigneshr@ti.com (Vignesh R)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder- Add support for absolute encoder
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:14:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573DA70F.70206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573DA29A.1080609@samsung.com>

Hi,

On 05/19/2016 04:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[...]
> On 05/19/2016 11:04 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> index c7fc8d4fb080..8f60289fb6cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> @@ -25,24 +25,29 @@
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>>  #include <linux/property.h>
>> +#include <linux/input-polldev.h>
>>  
>>  #define DRV_NAME "rotary-encoder"
>>  
>>  struct rotary_encoder {
>>  	struct input_dev *input;
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Ifdefs look dirty.

I will drop this.

> 
>> +	struct input_polled_dev *poll_dev;
>> +#endif
>>  	struct mutex access_mutex;
>>  
>>  	u32 steps;
>>  	u32 axis;
>>  	bool relative_axis;
>>  	bool rollover;
>> +	bool absolute_encoder;
>>  
>>  	unsigned int pos;
>>  
>>  	struct gpio_descs *gpios;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>>  
>> -	unsigned int *irq;
>> +	int *irq;
>>  
>>  	bool armed;
>>  	signed char dir;	/* 1 - clockwise, -1 - CCW */
>> @@ -67,6 +72,21 @@ static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_state(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  	return ret & 3;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(struct rotary_encoder
>> +						   *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	unsigned int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < encoder->gpios->ndescs; ++i) {
>> +		int val = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(encoder->gpios->desc[i]);
>> +
>> +		ret = ret << 1 | val;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void rotary_encoder_report_event(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  {
>>  	if (encoder->relative_axis) {
>> @@ -178,6 +198,72 @@ out:
>>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void rotary_encoder_setup_input_params(struct rotary_encoder  *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	struct input_dev *input = encoder->input;
>> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(encoder->dev);
>> +
>> +	input->name = pdev->name;
>> +	input->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
>> +	input->dev.parent = encoder->dev;
>> +
>> +	if (encoder->relative_axis)
>> +		input_set_capability(input, EV_REL, encoder->axis);
>> +	else
>> +		input_set_abs_params(input,
>> +				     encoder->axis, 0, encoder->steps, 0, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t rotary_absolute_encoder_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct rotary_encoder *encoder = dev_id;
>> +	unsigned int state;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
>> +
>> +	state = rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(encoder);
>> +	if (state != encoder->last_stable) {
>> +		input_report_abs(encoder->input, encoder->axis, state);
>> +		input_sync(encoder->input);
>> +		encoder->last_stable = state;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
> 
> 1. Double mutex_lock()? Oh, that is weird. Please document it at least
> in form of lockdep annotations.
> 
> 2. Maybe that should be unlock? Did you test this code?
> 

Sorry... this should have been unlock.
I dont have a h/w with rotary-encoder hooked to IRQ line. It would be
much appreciated if someone with rotary-encoder hooked up to h/w IRQ
line test this patch.

>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Same here and later in the code, ifdefs look dirty.

Ok, I will remove #ifdefs and directly select INPUT_POLLDEV when
INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER is selected.

-- 
Regards
Vignesh

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com>,
	Masanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	S Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>,
	Guido Martinez <guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar>,
	Clifton Barnes <clifton.a.barnes@gmail.com>,
	Uwe Kleine-Konig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	<linux-input@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder- Add support for absolute encoder
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 17:14:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <573DA70F.70206@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573DA29A.1080609@samsung.com>

Hi,

On 05/19/2016 04:55 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
[...]
> On 05/19/2016 11:04 AM, Vignesh R wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> index c7fc8d4fb080..8f60289fb6cd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/rotary_encoder.c
>> @@ -25,24 +25,29 @@
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/pm.h>
>>  #include <linux/property.h>
>> +#include <linux/input-polldev.h>
>>  
>>  #define DRV_NAME "rotary-encoder"
>>  
>>  struct rotary_encoder {
>>  	struct input_dev *input;
>> -
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Ifdefs look dirty.

I will drop this.

> 
>> +	struct input_polled_dev *poll_dev;
>> +#endif
>>  	struct mutex access_mutex;
>>  
>>  	u32 steps;
>>  	u32 axis;
>>  	bool relative_axis;
>>  	bool rollover;
>> +	bool absolute_encoder;
>>  
>>  	unsigned int pos;
>>  
>>  	struct gpio_descs *gpios;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>>  
>> -	unsigned int *irq;
>> +	int *irq;
>>  
>>  	bool armed;
>>  	signed char dir;	/* 1 - clockwise, -1 - CCW */
>> @@ -67,6 +72,21 @@ static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_state(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  	return ret & 3;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static unsigned int rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(struct rotary_encoder
>> +						   *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	unsigned int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < encoder->gpios->ndescs; ++i) {
>> +		int val = gpiod_get_value_cansleep(encoder->gpios->desc[i]);
>> +
>> +		ret = ret << 1 | val;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void rotary_encoder_report_event(struct rotary_encoder *encoder)
>>  {
>>  	if (encoder->relative_axis) {
>> @@ -178,6 +198,72 @@ out:
>>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void rotary_encoder_setup_input_params(struct rotary_encoder  *encoder)
>> +{
>> +	struct input_dev *input = encoder->input;
>> +	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(encoder->dev);
>> +
>> +	input->name = pdev->name;
>> +	input->id.bustype = BUS_HOST;
>> +	input->dev.parent = encoder->dev;
>> +
>> +	if (encoder->relative_axis)
>> +		input_set_capability(input, EV_REL, encoder->axis);
>> +	else
>> +		input_set_abs_params(input,
>> +				     encoder->axis, 0, encoder->steps, 0, 1);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t rotary_absolute_encoder_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct rotary_encoder *encoder = dev_id;
>> +	unsigned int state;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
>> +
>> +	state = rotary_encoder_get_gpios_state(encoder);
>> +	if (state != encoder->last_stable) {
>> +		input_report_abs(encoder->input, encoder->axis, state);
>> +		input_sync(encoder->input);
>> +		encoder->last_stable = state;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&encoder->access_mutex);
> 
> 1. Double mutex_lock()? Oh, that is weird. Please document it at least
> in form of lockdep annotations.
> 
> 2. Maybe that should be unlock? Did you test this code?
> 

Sorry... this should have been unlock.
I dont have a h/w with rotary-encoder hooked to IRQ line. It would be
much appreciated if someone with rotary-encoder hooked up to h/w IRQ
line test this patch.

>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER_POLL_MODE_SUPPORT
> 
> Same here and later in the code, ifdefs look dirty.

Ok, I will remove #ifdefs and directly select INPUT_POLLDEV when
INPUT_GPIO_ROTARY_ENCODER is selected.

-- 
Regards
Vignesh

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-19  9:03 [RFC PATCH 0/2] AM335x-ICE: Add support for rotary-encoder Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:03 ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:03 ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] Input: rotary-encoder- Add support for absolute encoder Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04   ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04   ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19 11:25   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-05-19 11:25     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-05-19 11:44     ` Vignesh R [this message]
2016-05-19 11:44       ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19 11:44       ` Vignesh R
2016-05-20 16:34   ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-05-20 16:34     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-05-20 16:34     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2016-05-23  9:18     ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-23  9:18       ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-23  9:18       ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-25  8:44       ` Vignesh R
2016-05-25  8:44         ` Vignesh R
2016-05-25  8:44         ` Vignesh R
2016-06-16 10:47         ` Vignesh R
2016-06-16 10:47           ` Vignesh R
2016-06-16 10:47           ` Vignesh R
2016-07-19 13:04           ` R, Vignesh
2016-07-19 13:04             ` R, Vignesh
2016-07-19 13:04             ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-20 21:49   ` Rob Herring
2016-05-20 21:49     ` Rob Herring
2016-05-22 10:26   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-22 10:26     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-22 10:26     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-23 11:18     ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-23 11:18       ` R, Vignesh
2016-05-23 11:18       ` R, Vignesh
     [not found]       ` <5742E710.9-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-23 13:18         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-23 13:18           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-23 13:18           ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-24  5:09           ` Vignesh R
2016-05-24  5:09             ` Vignesh R
2016-05-24  5:09             ` Vignesh R
2016-05-24  8:20             ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-24  8:20               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-24  8:20               ` Uwe Kleine-König
2016-05-25  8:44               ` Vignesh R
2016-05-25  8:44                 ` Vignesh R
2016-05-25  8:44                 ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: am335x-icev2: Add rotary-encoder node Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04   ` Vignesh R
2016-05-19  9:04   ` Vignesh R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=573DA70F.70206@ti.com \
    --to=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=clifton.a.barnes@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=guido@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=moritz.fischer@ettus.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=standby24x7@gmail.com \
    --cc=stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com \
    --cc=sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com \
    --cc=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.