Re: [PATCH 2/6] Documentation: bindings: add dt doc for Rockchip USB Type-C PHY

[Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>]

On 06/01/2016 03:57 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Chris,
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:46 AM, Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com> wrote:
>> Hi Heiko
>>
>>
>> On 05/27/2016 04:29 PM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> Hi Chris,
>>>
>>> Am Freitag, 27. Mai 2016, 14:02:15 schrieb Chris Zhong:
>>>> This patch adds a binding that describes the Rockchip USB Type-C PHY
>>>> for rk3399.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Zhong <zyw@rock-chips.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>    .../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt | 55
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt new file
>>>> mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..402f667
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-typec.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
>>>> +ROCKCHIP type-c PHY
>>>> +
>>>> +Required properties:
>>>> + - compatible: should be "rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy"
>>>> + - reg : Address and length of the usb phy control register set
>>>> + - rockchip,grf : phandle to the syscon managing the "general
>>>> +   register files"
>>>> + - clocks : phandle + clock specifier for the phy clocks
>>>> + - clock-names: string, clock name, must be "tcpdcore", "tcpdphy_ref";
>>>> + - resets : a list of phandle + reset specifier pairs
>>>> + - reset-names : string reset name, must be:
>>>> +                "tcphy_rst", "tcphy_pipe_rst", "uphy_tcphy_rst"
> In other contexts I believe Heiko has requested that a suffix like
> "_rst" not be present in the names of reset signals.  We already know
> that this is a list of reset names so the "_rst" is redundant.
Yes, "_rst" is redundant.I will remove it next version.
>
>>>> + - #phy-cells: Must be 0.  See ./phy-bindings.txt for details.
>>>> + - rockchip,usb3phy*: phy registers embed in grf
>>>> +
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +       tcphy0: phy@ff7c0000 {
>>>> +               compatible = "rockchip,rk3399-typec-phy";
>>>> +               reg = <0x0 0xff7c0000 0x0 0x40000>;
>>>> +               #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>> +               rockchip,grf = <&grf>;
>>>> +               clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
>>>> +                        <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>>>> +               clock-names = "tcpdcore", "tcpdphy_ref";
>>>> +               resets = <&cru SRST_UPHY0>,
>>>> +                        <&cru SRST_UPHY0_PIPE_L00>,
>>>> +                        <&cru SRST_P_UPHY0_TCPHY>;
>>>> +               reset-names = "tcphy_rst", "tcphy_pipe_rst",
>>>> "uphy_tcphy_rst";
>>>> +               rockchip,usb3phy_con0 = <0x0e580 0 16>;
>>>> +               rockchip,usb3phy_con1 = <0x0e584 0 16>;
>>>> +               rockchip,usb3phy_con2 = <0x0e588 0 16>;
>>>> +               rockchip,usb3phy_status0 = <0x0e5c0 0 13>;
>>>> +               rockchip,usb3phy_status1 = <0x0e5c4 0 12>;
>>> please embedded this register data in the driver instead (not in the
>>> devicetree), matched against the compatible value.
>>> See Frank's usb2phy driver for reference if needed.
>> Okay, I will move them to driver file next version, Thanks.
> Just making sure: I saw a RESEND of your original version get posted,
> but nothing that addresses Heiko's comments, right?
>
> Also: note that bindings should be sent in the patch _before_ the
> code.  So instead of:
>    [1] phy: Add USB Type-C PHY driver for rk3399
>    [2] Documentation: bindings: add dt doc for Rockchip USB Type-C PHY
>    [3] drm/rockchip: vop: add cdn DP support for rk3399
>    [4] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for cdn DP controller
>
> You should have:
>    [1] Documentation: bindings: add dt doc for Rockchip USB Type-C PHY
>    [2] phy: Add USB Type-C PHY driver for rk3399
>    [3] Documentation: bindings: add dt documentation for cdn DP controller
>    [4] drm/rockchip: vop: add cdn DP support for rk3399
The first patch is lack of a header file, so I resend the patches, and 
did not change anything, I will do them in V1 version.
And I will change the  sequence of patches, Thanks for your comments.


>
> -Doug
>
>
>