All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com (Arend van Spriel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: building and using modules on arm64 hikey board
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:40:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EF3D4.8030500@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <370e5b2b-7f7d-6912-0f8e-71324974a9cb@broadcom.com>

On 01-06-16 11:01, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31-5-2016 22:58, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 31 May 2016 at 22:24, Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> This is likely caused by the fact that the Android AArch64 toolchain uses -fpic by default. Could you try adding -fno-pic to the CFLAGS?
>>>
>>> Actually Arend is using 4.4, and we need to pull your fix, Ard:
>>>
>>> commit 80a2d83376001f6a1993f2e925670ab0e4cdb76d
>>> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> Date:   Tue Jan 5 10:18:52 2016 +0100
>>>
>>>     arm64: module: avoid undefined shift behavior in reloc_data()
>>>
>>
>> OK, that was going to be my next question to Arend, i.e., to check
>> whether he has all the recent fixes we did for the module loader.
>>
>> But I'd also like to understand how we ended up with PREL32
>> relocations in the first place, since those are quite unusual in
>> object code generated from generic C source code when using the
>> non-pic small model, which is normally GCC's default. Are there any
>> other code generation defaults for the Android  AArch64 GCC toolchain
>> that you are aware of?
> 
> For the module I noticed it uses command line parameter -mcmodel=large
> so I suppose that could be how I ended up with PREL32.
> 
> In arch/arm64/Makefile there is this:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419), y)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE    += -mcmodel=large
> endif
> 
> And that Kconfig item is indeed set.

Picked up two patches that Dmitry (big thanks!) backported from upstream:

https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/234335/
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/234336/

Did the trick for me.

Regards,
Arend

> Regards,
> Arend
> 
>>>>> On 30 mei 2016, at 12:21, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I got myself an arm64 HiKey board from LeMaker and build an Android AOSP
>>>>> image for it (see [1]). For development I would like to use
>>>>> CONFIG_MODULES. However, when I try to insmod the build module I get:
>>>>>
>>>>> [  287.903653] module cfg80211: overflow in relocation type 261 val
>>>>> ffffffbffc006530
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking AArch64 ELF documentation [2], section 4.6.5, it has:
>>>>> code|name            |operation |overflow check   |
>>>>> 261 |R_AARCH64_PREL32|S + A - P |-2^31 <= X < 2^32|
>>>>>
>>>>> So basically the highest 32 bits should all be one and so ffffffbf is
>>>>> invalid. From what I could find searching internet it could be an issue
>>>>> with linker options so I build kernel and modules with V=1. Here the
>>>>> linker invocation for them:
>>>>>
>>>>> + aarch64-linux-android-ld -EL -p --no-undefined -X --build-id -o vmlinux \
>>>>> -T ./arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arm64/kernel/head.o
>>>>> init/built-in.o \
>>>>> --start-group usr/built-in.o arch/arm64/kernel/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/built-in.o \
>>>>> arch/arm64/net/built-in.o arch/arm64/kvm/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm64/crypto/built-in.o \
>>>>> ./drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a kernel/built-in.o certs/built-in.o
>>>>> mm/built-in.o \
>>>>> fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o
>>>>> block/built-in.o \
>>>>> arch/arm64/lib/lib.a lib/lib.a arch/arm64/lib/built-in.o lib/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/built-in.o \
>>>>> sound/built-in.o firmware/built-in.o net/built-in.o virt/built-in.o
>>>>> --end-group .tmp_kallsyms2.o
>>>>>
>>>>>  aarch64-linux-android-ld -EL -r  -T ./scripts/module-common.lds
>>>>> --build-id \
>>>>>  -o net/wireless/cfg80211.ko net/wireless/cfg80211.o
>>>>> net/wireless/cfg80211.mod.o
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached are vmlinux.lds and module-common.lds. I also tried taking
>>>>> upstream arch/arm64/kernel/module.lds in hikey-linaro tree. If someone
>>>>> can give a hint or educated guess at what to try it would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Arend
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://source.android.com/source/devices.html#building-kernel
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0056b/IHI0056B_aaelf64.pdf
>>>>> <module-common.lds>
>>>>> <vmlinux.lds>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: building and using modules on arm64 hikey board
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:40:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <574EF3D4.8030500@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <370e5b2b-7f7d-6912-0f8e-71324974a9cb@broadcom.com>

On 01-06-16 11:01, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 31-5-2016 22:58, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 31 May 2016 at 22:24, Dmitry Shmidt <dimitrysh@google.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 4:30 AM, Ard Biesheuvel
>>> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> This is likely caused by the fact that the Android AArch64 toolchain uses -fpic by default. Could you try adding -fno-pic to the CFLAGS?
>>>
>>> Actually Arend is using 4.4, and we need to pull your fix, Ard:
>>>
>>> commit 80a2d83376001f6a1993f2e925670ab0e4cdb76d
>>> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>>> Date:   Tue Jan 5 10:18:52 2016 +0100
>>>
>>>     arm64: module: avoid undefined shift behavior in reloc_data()
>>>
>>
>> OK, that was going to be my next question to Arend, i.e., to check
>> whether he has all the recent fixes we did for the module loader.
>>
>> But I'd also like to understand how we ended up with PREL32
>> relocations in the first place, since those are quite unusual in
>> object code generated from generic C source code when using the
>> non-pic small model, which is normally GCC's default. Are there any
>> other code generation defaults for the Android  AArch64 GCC toolchain
>> that you are aware of?
> 
> For the module I noticed it uses command line parameter -mcmodel=large
> so I suppose that could be how I ended up with PREL32.
> 
> In arch/arm64/Makefile there is this:
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419), y)
> KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE    += -mcmodel=large
> endif
> 
> And that Kconfig item is indeed set.

Picked up two patches that Dmitry (big thanks!) backported from upstream:

https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/234335/
https://android-review.googlesource.com/#/c/234336/

Did the trick for me.

Regards,
Arend

> Regards,
> Arend
> 
>>>>> On 30 mei 2016, at 12:21, Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I got myself an arm64 HiKey board from LeMaker and build an Android AOSP
>>>>> image for it (see [1]). For development I would like to use
>>>>> CONFIG_MODULES. However, when I try to insmod the build module I get:
>>>>>
>>>>> [  287.903653] module cfg80211: overflow in relocation type 261 val
>>>>> ffffffbffc006530
>>>>>
>>>>> Looking AArch64 ELF documentation [2], section 4.6.5, it has:
>>>>> code|name            |operation |overflow check   |
>>>>> 261 |R_AARCH64_PREL32|S + A - P |-2^31 <= X < 2^32|
>>>>>
>>>>> So basically the highest 32 bits should all be one and so ffffffbf is
>>>>> invalid. From what I could find searching internet it could be an issue
>>>>> with linker options so I build kernel and modules with V=1. Here the
>>>>> linker invocation for them:
>>>>>
>>>>> + aarch64-linux-android-ld -EL -p --no-undefined -X --build-id -o vmlinux \
>>>>> -T ./arch/arm64/kernel/vmlinux.lds arch/arm64/kernel/head.o
>>>>> init/built-in.o \
>>>>> --start-group usr/built-in.o arch/arm64/kernel/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm64/mm/built-in.o \
>>>>> arch/arm64/net/built-in.o arch/arm64/kvm/built-in.o
>>>>> arch/arm64/crypto/built-in.o \
>>>>> ./drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/lib.a kernel/built-in.o certs/built-in.o
>>>>> mm/built-in.o \
>>>>> fs/built-in.o ipc/built-in.o security/built-in.o crypto/built-in.o
>>>>> block/built-in.o \
>>>>> arch/arm64/lib/lib.a lib/lib.a arch/arm64/lib/built-in.o lib/built-in.o
>>>>> drivers/built-in.o \
>>>>> sound/built-in.o firmware/built-in.o net/built-in.o virt/built-in.o
>>>>> --end-group .tmp_kallsyms2.o
>>>>>
>>>>>  aarch64-linux-android-ld -EL -r  -T ./scripts/module-common.lds
>>>>> --build-id \
>>>>>  -o net/wireless/cfg80211.ko net/wireless/cfg80211.o
>>>>> net/wireless/cfg80211.mod.o
>>>>>
>>>>> Attached are vmlinux.lds and module-common.lds. I also tried taking
>>>>> upstream arch/arm64/kernel/module.lds in hikey-linaro tree. If someone
>>>>> can give a hint or educated guess at what to try it would be appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Arend
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://source.android.com/source/devices.html#building-kernel
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0056b/IHI0056B_aaelf64.pdf
>>>>> <module-common.lds>
>>>>> <vmlinux.lds>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-01 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-30 10:21 building and using modules on arm64 hikey board Arend Van Spriel
2016-05-30 10:21 ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-05-30 11:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-30 11:30   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-30 18:54   ` Arend van Spriel
2016-05-30 18:54     ` Arend van Spriel
2016-05-31  1:53     ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-05-31  1:53       ` Jisheng Zhang
2016-05-31 20:24   ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-05-31 20:24     ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-05-31 20:58     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-05-31 20:58       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-06-01  9:01       ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-01  9:01         ` Arend Van Spriel
2016-06-01 14:40         ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
2016-06-01 14:40           ` Arend van Spriel
2016-06-01 21:42       ` Dmitry Shmidt
2016-06-01 21:42         ` Dmitry Shmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=574EF3D4.8030500@broadcom.com \
    --to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.