Re: [PATCH 5/8] x86, pkeys: allocation/free syscalls

[Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>]

On 06/01/2016 11:37 AM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> +static inline
>> +int mm_pkey_free(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
>> +{
>> +	/*
>> +	 * pkey 0 is special, always allocated and can never
>> +	 * be freed.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!pkey || !validate_pkey(pkey))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	if (!mm_pkey_is_allocated(mm, pkey))
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	mm_set_pkey_free(mm, pkey);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> If I read this right, it doesn't actually remove any pkey restrictions
> that may have been applied while the key was allocated.  So there could be
> pages with that key assigned that might do surprising things if the key is
> reallocated for another use later, right?  Is that how the API is intended
> to work?

Yeah, that's how it works.

It's not ideal.  It would be _best_ if we during mm_pkey_free(), we
ensured that no VMAs under that mm have that vma_pkey() set.  But, that
search would be potentially expensive (a walk over all VMAs), or would
force us to keep a data structure with a count of all the VMAs with a
given key.

I should probably discuss this behavior in the manpages and address it
more directly in the changelog for this patch.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>