All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio: Don't access hardware registers after stopping clocks
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:34:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5753942.6DRRAABTSC@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoQD+sneTT7tCYji7YGpX5eJEQrWCQoX8jWJ1hiChjFh_g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Magnus,

On Tuesday 19 June 2012 15:53:30 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> >> Guennadi, does this trigger on sh7372 as well? If not, why is that?
> > 
> > No. That message is produced by the sh_mobile_sdhi_wait_idle() function,
> > which is only used, if the TMIO_MMC_HAS_IDLE_WAIT flag is set, which is
> > not set on mackerel (or ap4evb).
> 
> Ok, thanks for checking this. It seems that we are "lucky" to find
> this breakage...
> 
> In the future, please take care to make sure this does not happen
> again. This goes without saying, but the driver should not access the
> hardware when it is Runtime PM suspended. I believe it should be
> possible to verify the code paths by manual code inspection. Also, to
> make the behavior more consistent you may want to make use of
> "pm_runtime_put_sync()" instead of "pm_runtime_put()".

For testing that's a good idea. That makes me wonder whether we should have a 
Kconfig option to turn all pm_runtime_put() into pm_runtime_put_sync() for 
stress-testing.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>
Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: tmio: Don't access hardware registers after stopping clocks
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 09:34:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5753942.6DRRAABTSC@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANqRtoQD+sneTT7tCYji7YGpX5eJEQrWCQoX8jWJ1hiChjFh_g@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Magnus,

On Tuesday 19 June 2012 15:53:30 Magnus Damm wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > 
> > [snip]
> > 
> >> Guennadi, does this trigger on sh7372 as well? If not, why is that?
> > 
> > No. That message is produced by the sh_mobile_sdhi_wait_idle() function,
> > which is only used, if the TMIO_MMC_HAS_IDLE_WAIT flag is set, which is
> > not set on mackerel (or ap4evb).
> 
> Ok, thanks for checking this. It seems that we are "lucky" to find
> this breakage...
> 
> In the future, please take care to make sure this does not happen
> again. This goes without saying, but the driver should not access the
> hardware when it is Runtime PM suspended. I believe it should be
> possible to verify the code paths by manual code inspection. Also, to
> make the behavior more consistent you may want to make use of
> "pm_runtime_put_sync()" instead of "pm_runtime_put()".

For testing that's a good idea. That makes me wonder whether we should have a 
Kconfig option to turn all pm_runtime_put() into pm_runtime_put_sync() for 
stress-testing.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-19  9:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-12 12:57 [PATCH] mmc: tmio: Don't access hardware registers after stopping clocks Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-12 12:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-12 13:31 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-06-12 13:31   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-06-12 21:28   ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-12 21:28     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-14 11:12 ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-14 11:12   ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-14 19:12   ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-14 19:12     ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-14 19:37     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-14 19:37       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-14 20:34       ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-14 20:34         ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-14 21:48         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-14 21:48           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-15 10:03           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-15 10:03             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-15 10:17             ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-15 10:17               ` Laurent Pinchart
2012-06-15 19:08               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-15 19:08                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-06-15  0:47     ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-15  0:47       ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-15  7:09       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-06-15  7:09         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2012-06-19  6:53         ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-19  6:53           ` Magnus Damm
2012-06-19  9:34           ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2012-06-19  9:34             ` Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5753942.6DRRAABTSC@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.