From: dave.long@linaro.org (David Long)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v13 04/10] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbol
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:52:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57564503.8080304@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160604124032.94ac1bb76fde6c661e1a47a5@kernel.org>
On 06/03/2016 11:40 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:26:18 -0400
> David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
>>
>> Add all function symbols which are called from do_debug_exception under
>> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL, as they can not kprobed.
>
> I see, but this patch should be applied after kprobes
> are implemented on arm64.
>
> And also, I have a comment below.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 5954881..4359ca8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_sp_pc_abort(unsigned long addr,
>> info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
>> arm64_notify_die("Oops - SP/PC alignment exception", regs, &info, esr);
>> }
>> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_debug_exception)
>
> This seems at wrong place. Please correct it in this patch.
>
> Thank you,
>
Hmm, yeah not sure how that happened. It gets fixed in the next patch
but it shouldn't be like this.
Thanks,
-dl
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Huang Shijie" <shijie.huang@arm.com>,
"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
"Pratyush Anand" <panand@redhat.com>,
"Sandeepa Prabhu" <sandeepa.s.prabhu@gmail.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"William Cohen" <wcohen@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Steve Capper" <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
"Li Bin" <huawei.libin@huawei.com>,
"Adam Buchbinder" <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>,
"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Andrey Ryabinin" <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Christoffer Dall" <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>,
"Daniel Thompson" <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
"Dave P Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
"Jens Wiklander" <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>,
"Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@marvell.com>,
"John Blackwood" <john.blackwood@ccur.com>,
"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
"Vladimir Murzin" <Vladimir.Murzin@arm.com>,
"Yang Shi" <yang.shi@linaro.org>,
"Zi Shen Lim" <zlim.lnx@gmail.com>,
"yalin wang" <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 04/10] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbol
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:52:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57564503.8080304@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160604124032.94ac1bb76fde6c661e1a47a5@kernel.org>
On 06/03/2016 11:40 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 23:26:18 -0400
> David Long <dave.long@linaro.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>
>>
>> Add all function symbols which are called from do_debug_exception under
>> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL, as they can not kprobed.
>
> I see, but this patch should be applied after kprobes
> are implemented on arm64.
>
> And also, I have a comment below.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> index 5954881..4359ca8 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c
>> @@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ asmlinkage void __exception do_sp_pc_abort(unsigned long addr,
>> info.si_addr = (void __user *)addr;
>> arm64_notify_die("Oops - SP/PC alignment exception", regs, &info, esr);
>> }
>> +NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_debug_exception)
>
> This seems at wrong place. Please correct it in this patch.
>
> Thank you,
>
Hmm, yeah not sure how that happened. It gets fixed in the next patch
but it shouldn't be like this.
Thanks,
-dl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-03 3:26 [PATCH v13 00/10] arm64: Add kernel probes (kprobes) support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 01/10] arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-03 11:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-03 11:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-20 2:43 ` Li Bin
2016-06-20 2:43 ` Li Bin
2016-06-23 13:48 ` David Long
2016-06-23 13:48 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 02/10] arm64: Add more test functions to insn.c David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-08 1:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-08 1:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-10 14:54 ` David Long
2016-06-10 14:54 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 03/10] arm64: add conditional instruction simulation support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-04 3:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-04 3:53 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:19 ` David Long
2016-06-13 4:19 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 04/10] arm64: Blacklist non-kprobe-able symbol David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-04 3:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-04 3:40 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 3:52 ` David Long [this message]
2016-06-07 3:52 ` David Long
2016-06-10 19:16 ` David Long
2016-06-10 19:16 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 05/10] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-08 1:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-08 1:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:10 ` David Long
2016-06-13 4:10 ` David Long
2016-06-13 6:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 6:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 15:22 ` David Long
2016-06-13 15:22 ` David Long
2016-06-14 0:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-14 0:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-22 18:28 ` David Long
2016-06-22 18:28 ` David Long
2016-06-14 1:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-14 1:42 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 06/10] arm64: Treat all entry code as non-kprobe-able David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-07 0:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 0:34 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 07/10] arm64: kprobes instruction simulation support David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 08/10] arm64: Add trampoline code for kretprobes David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-07 10:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 10:38 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-13 4:23 ` David Long
2016-06-13 4:23 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 09/10] arm64: Add kernel return probes support (kretprobes) David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-07 10:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 10:28 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-22 18:16 ` David Long
2016-06-22 18:16 ` David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` [PATCH v13 10/10] kprobes: Add arm64 case in kprobe example module David Long
2016-06-03 3:26 ` David Long
2016-06-07 10:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-07 10:12 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2016-06-08 5:49 ` Huang Shijie
2016-06-08 5:49 ` Huang Shijie
2016-06-27 2:54 ` David Long
2016-06-27 2:54 ` David Long
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57564503.8080304@linaro.org \
--to=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.