All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, jason@lakedaemon.net, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com,
	shijie.huang@arm.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
	hanjun.guo@linaro.org, al.stone@linaro.org, mw@semihalf.com,
	graeme.gregory@linaro.org, Catalin.Marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	ddaney.cavm@gmail.com, okaya@codeaurora.org,
	andrea.gallo@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/7] ARM64, ACPI, PCI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support.
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:34:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756DB5A.4080901@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160604121530.62539dc6@arm.com>

On 04.06.2016 13:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:19:38 +0200
> Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
>> IORT shows representation of IO topology for ARM based systems.
>> It describes how various components are connected together on
>> parent-child basis e.g. PCI RC -> SMMU -> ITS. Also see IORT spec.
>>
>> Initial support allows to:
>> - register ITS MSI chip along with ITS translation ID and domain token
>> - deregister ITS MSI chip based on ITS translation ID
>> - find registered domain token based on ITS translation ID
>> - map MSI RID based on PCI device and requester ID
>> - find domain token based on PCI device and requester ID
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig  |   3 +
>>   drivers/acpi/Makefile |   1 +
>>   drivers/acpi/iort.c   | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/iort.h  |  38 ++++++
>>   4 files changed, 386 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/iort.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/iort.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index b7e2e77..848471f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ config ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT
>>   config ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED
>>   	bool
>>
>> +config IORT_TABLE
>> +	bool
>> +
>>   config ACPI_DEBUGGER
>>   	bool "AML debugger interface"
>>   	select ACPI_DEBUG
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> index 251ce85..c7c9b29 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT)		+= bgrt.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB)	+= cppc_acpi.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER_USER) += acpi_dbg.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_IORT_TABLE) 	+= iort.o
>>
>>   # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
>>   processor-y			:= processor_driver.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..226eb6d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Semihalf
>> + *	Author: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
>> + * more details.
>> + *
>> + * This file implements early detection/parsing of I/O mapping
>> + * reported to OS through firmware via I/O Remapping Table (IORT)
>> + * IORT document number: ARM DEN 0049A
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"ACPI: IORT: " fmt
>> +
>> +#include <linux/export.h>
>> +#include <linux/iort.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +
>> +struct iort_its_msi_chip {
>> +	struct list_head	list;
>> +	struct fwnode_handle	*fw_node;
>> +	u32			translation_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +typedef acpi_status (*iort_find_node_callback)
>> +	(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context);
>> +
>> +/* Root pointer to the mapped IORT table */
>> +static struct acpi_table_header *iort_table;
>> +
>> +static LIST_HEAD(iort_msi_chip_list);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_register_domain_token() - register domain token and related ITS ID
>> + * 				  to the list from where we can get it back
>> + * 				  later on.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + * @token: domain token
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, -ENOMEM if not memory when allocating list element.
>> + */
>> +int iort_register_domain_token(int trans_id, struct fwnode_handle *fw_node)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip;
>> +
>> +	its_msi_chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*its_msi_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!its_msi_chip)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	its_msi_chip->fw_node = fw_node;
>> +	its_msi_chip->translation_id = trans_id;
>> +
>> +	list_add(&its_msi_chip->list, &iort_msi_chip_list);
>
> No locking? How do you handle concurrent accesses?

I wandered if we need locking here but at the end I did not find 
worst-case scenario.

1. Adding elements to list is done in first place here (later on list is 
not modified):
start_kernel -> init_IRQ -> [...] - > gic_acpi_parse_madt_its -> 
iort_register_domain_token

2. Then we only retrieving elements form list:

start_kernel -> rest_init -> kernel_init -> [...] -> do_initcalls -> 
its_pci_msi_init -> its_pci_acpi_msi_init -> iort_its_find_domain_token

pci_set_msi_domain -> iort_get_device_domain -> iort_its_find_domain_token

Do you mean some specific case?

>
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_unregister_domain_token() - unregister domain token based on ITS ID.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: none.
>> + */
>> +void iort_deregister_domain_token(int trans_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip, *t;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(its_msi_chip, t, &iort_msi_chip_list, list) {
>> +		if (its_msi_chip->translation_id == trans_id) {
>> +			list_del(&its_msi_chip->list);
>> +			kfree(its_msi_chip);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_find_its_domain_token() - find domain token based on given ITS ID.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: domain token when find on the list, NULL otherwise.
>> + */
>> +struct fwnode_handle *iort_its_find_domain_token(int trans_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(its_msi_chip, &iort_msi_chip_list, list) {
>> +		if (its_msi_chip->translation_id == trans_id)
>> +			return its_msi_chip->fw_node;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_scan_node(enum acpi_iort_node_type type,
>> +	       iort_find_node_callback callback, void *context)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node, *iort_end;
>> +	struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	if (!iort_table)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * iort_table and iort both point to the start of IORT table, but
>> +	 * have different struct types
>> +	 */
>> +	iort = (struct acpi_table_iort *)iort_table;
>> +
>> +	/* Get the first IORT node */
>> +	iort_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort,
>> +				 iort->node_offset);
>> +	iort_end = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_table,
>> +				iort_table->length);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < iort->node_count; i++) {
>> +		if (iort_node >= iort_end) {
>> +			pr_err("iort node pointer overflows, bad table\n");
>
> This probably deserves a WARN_ON, a TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND and maybe
> a TAINT_CRAP as an added injury.

I think we can use similar solution as in dmar.c

	if (WARN_TAINT(iort_node >= iort_end, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
		   "IORT node pointer overflows, bad table\n"))
		return NULL;

>
>> +			return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (iort_node->type == type) {
>> +			if (ACPI_SUCCESS(callback(iort_node, context)))
>> +				return iort_node;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		iort_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_node,
>> +					 iort_node->length);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static acpi_status
>> +iort_find_dev_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
>
> This is actually trying to match a node to a given device. How about
> calling it iort_match_node_callback?

Yeah, sounds good to me.

>
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_root_complex *pci_rc;
>> +	struct device *dev = context;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> +
>> +	switch (node->type) {
>> +	case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX:
>> +		bus = to_pci_bus(dev);
>> +		pci_rc = (struct acpi_iort_root_complex *)node->node_data;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * It is assumed that PCI segment numbers maps one-to-one
>> +		 * with root complexes. Each segment number can represent only
>> +		 * one root complex.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (pci_rc->pci_segment_number == pci_domain_nr(bus))
>> +			return AE_OK;
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return AE_NOT_FOUND;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_dev_map_rid(struct acpi_iort_node *node, u32 rid_in,
>> +			    u32 *rid_out)
>
> Given that there is no "dev" involved in this functions, but only
> nodes, consider renaming this to iort_node_map_rid.

+1

>
>> +{
>> +
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/* Go upstream */
>> +	while (node->type != ACPI_IORT_NODE_ITS_GROUP) {
>> +		struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *id;
>> +		int i, found = 0;
>> +
>> +		/* Exit when no mapping array */
>> +		if (!node->mapping_offset || !node->mapping_count)
>> +			return NULL;
>> +
>> +		id = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping, node,
>> +				  node->mapping_offset);
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0, found = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++, id++) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Single mapping is not translation rule,
>> +			 * lets move on for this case
>> +			 */
>> +			if (id->flags & ACPI_IORT_ID_SINGLE_MAPPING) {
>> +				if (node->type != ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) {
>> +					rid_in = id->output_base;
>> +					found = 1;
>> +					break;
>> +				}
>> +
>> +				pr_warn(FW_BUG "[node %p type %d] SINGLE MAPPING flag not allowed for SMMU node, skipping ID map\n",
>> +					node, node->type);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (rid_in < id->input_base ||
>> +			    (rid_in > id->input_base + id->id_count))
>> +				continue;
>> +
>> +			rid_in = id->output_base + (rid_in - id->input_base);
>> +			found = 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (!found)
>> +			return NULL;
>> +
>> +		/* Firmware bug! */
>> +		if (!id->output_reference) {
>> +			pr_err(FW_BUG "[node %p type %d] ID map has NULL parent reference\n",
>> +			       node, node->type);
>> +			return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_table,
>> +				    id->output_reference);
>> +	}
>
> Do we always want to resolve an ID from the device down to the last
> possible transformation? While this works fine for the ITS (which is
> supposed to be the last user of the RID), this may not work that well
> for intermediate remapping elements (IOMMU, for example).
>
> So I'm wondering if what we actually want is something that would say
> iort_node_map_rid(from_node, to_node, rid_in, &rid_out)?

Good point. Actually Lorenzo improved that function in his SMMU ACPI 
series addressing your comment. So we can make it more generic from day one.

>
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	if (rid_out)
>> +		*rid_out = rid_in;
>> +	return node;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id, u32 *dev_id)
>
> Does this only applies to a PCI device?

No, it does not. I will use struct device instead.

>
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_bus *pbus = pdev->bus;
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> +	/* Find a PCI root bus */
>> +	while (!pci_is_root_bus(pbus))
>> +		pbus = pbus->parent;
>> +
>> +
>> +	node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX,
>> +			      iort_find_dev_callback, &pbus->dev);
>> +	if (!node) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't find related IORT node\n");
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return iort_dev_map_rid(node, req_id, dev_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_domain_get_msi_rid() - find MSI RID based on PCI device ID
>
> This doesn't match the name of the function.
>
>> + * @pdev: The PCI device
>> + * @req_id: The PCI device requester ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: MSI RID on success, input requester ID otherwise
>> + */
>> +u32 iort_pci_get_msi_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id)
>> +{
>> +	u32 dev_id;
>> +
>> +	if (!iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(pdev, req_id, &dev_id))
>> +		return req_id;
>> +
>> +	return dev_id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_find_its_id() - find the ITS identifier based on specified device.
>> + * @pdev: The PCI device
>> + * @idx: Index of the ITS identifier list
>> + * @its_id: ITS identifier
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, appropriate error value otherwise
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +iort_pci_find_its_id(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id, unsigned int idx,
>> +		     int *its_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_its_group *its;
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> +	node = iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(pdev, req_id, NULL);
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +	/* Move to ITS specific data */
>> +	its = (struct acpi_iort_its_group *)node->node_data;
>> +	if (idx > its->its_count) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "requested ITS ID index [%d] is greater than available[%d]\n",
>> +			idx, its->its_count);
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	*its_id = its->identifiers[idx];
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_get_msi_domain_handle() - find registered domain token related to
>> + *                                    PCI device
>
> Broken comment.

Will fix.

>
>> + * @pdev:    The PCI device
>> + * @req_id:  The PCI device requester ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: the MSI domain for this device, NULL otherwise
>> + */
>> +struct irq_domain *
>> +iort_pci_get_domain(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id)
>
> Again: does this have to be PCI specific?

Here struct device can be used as well.

Thanks,
Tomasz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/7] ARM64, ACPI, PCI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support.
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:34:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756DB5A.4080901@semihalf.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160604121530.62539dc6@arm.com>

On 04.06.2016 13:15, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 13:19:38 +0200
> Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com> wrote:
>
>> IORT shows representation of IO topology for ARM based systems.
>> It describes how various components are connected together on
>> parent-child basis e.g. PCI RC -> SMMU -> ITS. Also see IORT spec.
>>
>> Initial support allows to:
>> - register ITS MSI chip along with ITS translation ID and domain token
>> - deregister ITS MSI chip based on ITS translation ID
>> - find registered domain token based on ITS translation ID
>> - map MSI RID based on PCI device and requester ID
>> - find domain token based on PCI device and requester ID
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/acpi/Kconfig  |   3 +
>>   drivers/acpi/Makefile |   1 +
>>   drivers/acpi/iort.c   | 344 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   include/linux/iort.h  |  38 ++++++
>>   4 files changed, 386 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/acpi/iort.c
>>   create mode 100644 include/linux/iort.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> index b7e2e77..848471f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
>> @@ -57,6 +57,9 @@ config ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT
>>   config ACPI_CCA_REQUIRED
>>   	bool
>>
>> +config IORT_TABLE
>> +	bool
>> +
>>   config ACPI_DEBUGGER
>>   	bool "AML debugger interface"
>>   	select ACPI_DEBUG
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Makefile b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> index 251ce85..c7c9b29 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/Makefile
>> @@ -82,6 +82,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CUSTOM_METHOD)+= custom_method.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_BGRT)		+= bgrt.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_LIB)	+= cppc_acpi.o
>>   obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUGGER_USER) += acpi_dbg.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_IORT_TABLE) 	+= iort.o
>>
>>   # processor has its own "processor." module_param namespace
>>   processor-y			:= processor_driver.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..226eb6d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/iort.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,344 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2016, Semihalf
>> + *	Author: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
>> + * more details.
>> + *
>> + * This file implements early detection/parsing of I/O mapping
>> + * reported to OS through firmware via I/O Remapping Table (IORT)
>> + * IORT document number: ARM DEN 0049A
>> + */
>> +
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt)	"ACPI: IORT: " fmt
>> +
>> +#include <linux/export.h>
>> +#include <linux/iort.h>
>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>> +
>> +struct iort_its_msi_chip {
>> +	struct list_head	list;
>> +	struct fwnode_handle	*fw_node;
>> +	u32			translation_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +typedef acpi_status (*iort_find_node_callback)
>> +	(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context);
>> +
>> +/* Root pointer to the mapped IORT table */
>> +static struct acpi_table_header *iort_table;
>> +
>> +static LIST_HEAD(iort_msi_chip_list);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_register_domain_token() - register domain token and related ITS ID
>> + * 				  to the list from where we can get it back
>> + * 				  later on.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + * @token: domain token
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, -ENOMEM if not memory when allocating list element.
>> + */
>> +int iort_register_domain_token(int trans_id, struct fwnode_handle *fw_node)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip;
>> +
>> +	its_msi_chip = kzalloc(sizeof(*its_msi_chip), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!its_msi_chip)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	its_msi_chip->fw_node = fw_node;
>> +	its_msi_chip->translation_id = trans_id;
>> +
>> +	list_add(&its_msi_chip->list, &iort_msi_chip_list);
>
> No locking? How do you handle concurrent accesses?

I wandered if we need locking here but at the end I did not find 
worst-case scenario.

1. Adding elements to list is done in first place here (later on list is 
not modified):
start_kernel -> init_IRQ -> [...] - > gic_acpi_parse_madt_its -> 
iort_register_domain_token

2. Then we only retrieving elements form list:

start_kernel -> rest_init -> kernel_init -> [...] -> do_initcalls -> 
its_pci_msi_init -> its_pci_acpi_msi_init -> iort_its_find_domain_token

pci_set_msi_domain -> iort_get_device_domain -> iort_its_find_domain_token

Do you mean some specific case?

>
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_unregister_domain_token() - unregister domain token based on ITS ID.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: none.
>> + */
>> +void iort_deregister_domain_token(int trans_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip, *t;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry_safe(its_msi_chip, t, &iort_msi_chip_list, list) {
>> +		if (its_msi_chip->translation_id == trans_id) {
>> +			list_del(&its_msi_chip->list);
>> +			kfree(its_msi_chip);
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_find_its_domain_token() - find domain token based on given ITS ID.
>> + * @translation_id: ITS ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: domain token when find on the list, NULL otherwise.
>> + */
>> +struct fwnode_handle *iort_its_find_domain_token(int trans_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct iort_its_msi_chip *its_msi_chip;
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(its_msi_chip, &iort_msi_chip_list, list) {
>> +		if (its_msi_chip->translation_id == trans_id)
>> +			return its_msi_chip->fw_node;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>
> Same here.
>
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_scan_node(enum acpi_iort_node_type type,
>> +	       iort_find_node_callback callback, void *context)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *iort_node, *iort_end;
>> +	struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
>> +	int i;
>> +
>> +	if (!iort_table)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * iort_table and iort both point to the start of IORT table, but
>> +	 * have different struct types
>> +	 */
>> +	iort = (struct acpi_table_iort *)iort_table;
>> +
>> +	/* Get the first IORT node */
>> +	iort_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort,
>> +				 iort->node_offset);
>> +	iort_end = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_table,
>> +				iort_table->length);
>> +
>> +	for (i = 0; i < iort->node_count; i++) {
>> +		if (iort_node >= iort_end) {
>> +			pr_err("iort node pointer overflows, bad table\n");
>
> This probably deserves a WARN_ON, a TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND and maybe
> a TAINT_CRAP as an added injury.

I think we can use similar solution as in dmar.c

	if (WARN_TAINT(iort_node >= iort_end, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND,
		   "IORT node pointer overflows, bad table\n"))
		return NULL;

>
>> +			return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (iort_node->type == type) {
>> +			if (ACPI_SUCCESS(callback(iort_node, context)))
>> +				return iort_node;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		iort_node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_node,
>> +					 iort_node->length);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return NULL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static acpi_status
>> +iort_find_dev_callback(struct acpi_iort_node *node, void *context)
>
> This is actually trying to match a node to a given device. How about
> calling it iort_match_node_callback?

Yeah, sounds good to me.

>
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_root_complex *pci_rc;
>> +	struct device *dev = context;
>> +	struct pci_bus *bus;
>> +
>> +	switch (node->type) {
>> +	case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX:
>> +		bus = to_pci_bus(dev);
>> +		pci_rc = (struct acpi_iort_root_complex *)node->node_data;
>> +
>> +		/*
>> +		 * It is assumed that PCI segment numbers maps one-to-one
>> +		 * with root complexes. Each segment number can represent only
>> +		 * one root complex.
>> +		 */
>> +		if (pci_rc->pci_segment_number == pci_domain_nr(bus))
>> +			return AE_OK;
>> +
>> +		break;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return AE_NOT_FOUND;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_dev_map_rid(struct acpi_iort_node *node, u32 rid_in,
>> +			    u32 *rid_out)
>
> Given that there is no "dev" involved in this functions, but only
> nodes, consider renaming this to iort_node_map_rid.

+1

>
>> +{
>> +
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		goto out;
>> +
>> +	/* Go upstream */
>> +	while (node->type != ACPI_IORT_NODE_ITS_GROUP) {
>> +		struct acpi_iort_id_mapping *id;
>> +		int i, found = 0;
>> +
>> +		/* Exit when no mapping array */
>> +		if (!node->mapping_offset || !node->mapping_count)
>> +			return NULL;
>> +
>> +		id = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_id_mapping, node,
>> +				  node->mapping_offset);
>> +
>> +		for (i = 0, found = 0; i < node->mapping_count; i++, id++) {
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Single mapping is not translation rule,
>> +			 * lets move on for this case
>> +			 */
>> +			if (id->flags & ACPI_IORT_ID_SINGLE_MAPPING) {
>> +				if (node->type != ACPI_IORT_NODE_SMMU) {
>> +					rid_in = id->output_base;
>> +					found = 1;
>> +					break;
>> +				}
>> +
>> +				pr_warn(FW_BUG "[node %p type %d] SINGLE MAPPING flag not allowed for SMMU node, skipping ID map\n",
>> +					node, node->type);
>> +				continue;
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			if (rid_in < id->input_base ||
>> +			    (rid_in > id->input_base + id->id_count))
>> +				continue;
>> +
>> +			rid_in = id->output_base + (rid_in - id->input_base);
>> +			found = 1;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (!found)
>> +			return NULL;
>> +
>> +		/* Firmware bug! */
>> +		if (!id->output_reference) {
>> +			pr_err(FW_BUG "[node %p type %d] ID map has NULL parent reference\n",
>> +			       node, node->type);
>> +			return NULL;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		node = ACPI_ADD_PTR(struct acpi_iort_node, iort_table,
>> +				    id->output_reference);
>> +	}
>
> Do we always want to resolve an ID from the device down to the last
> possible transformation? While this works fine for the ITS (which is
> supposed to be the last user of the RID), this may not work that well
> for intermediate remapping elements (IOMMU, for example).
>
> So I'm wondering if what we actually want is something that would say
> iort_node_map_rid(from_node, to_node, rid_in, &rid_out)?

Good point. Actually Lorenzo improved that function in his SMMU ACPI 
series addressing your comment. So we can make it more generic from day one.

>
>> +
>> +out:
>> +	if (rid_out)
>> +		*rid_out = rid_in;
>> +	return node;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct acpi_iort_node *
>> +iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id, u32 *dev_id)
>
> Does this only applies to a PCI device?

No, it does not. I will use struct device instead.

>
>> +{
>> +	struct pci_bus *pbus = pdev->bus;
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> +	/* Find a PCI root bus */
>> +	while (!pci_is_root_bus(pbus))
>> +		pbus = pbus->parent;
>> +
>> +
>> +	node = iort_scan_node(ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX,
>> +			      iort_find_dev_callback, &pbus->dev);
>> +	if (!node) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't find related IORT node\n");
>> +		return NULL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return iort_dev_map_rid(node, req_id, dev_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_domain_get_msi_rid() - find MSI RID based on PCI device ID
>
> This doesn't match the name of the function.
>
>> + * @pdev: The PCI device
>> + * @req_id: The PCI device requester ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: MSI RID on success, input requester ID otherwise
>> + */
>> +u32 iort_pci_get_msi_rid(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id)
>> +{
>> +	u32 dev_id;
>> +
>> +	if (!iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(pdev, req_id, &dev_id))
>> +		return req_id;
>> +
>> +	return dev_id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_find_its_id() - find the ITS identifier based on specified device.
>> + * @pdev: The PCI device
>> + * @idx: Index of the ITS identifier list
>> + * @its_id: ITS identifier
>> + *
>> + * Returns: 0 on success, appropriate error value otherwise
>> + */
>> +static int
>> +iort_pci_find_its_id(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id, unsigned int idx,
>> +		     int *its_id)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_iort_its_group *its;
>> +	struct acpi_iort_node *node;
>> +
>> +	node = iort_its_find_node_and_map_rid(pdev, req_id, NULL);
>> +	if (!node)
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +
>> +	/* Move to ITS specific data */
>> +	its = (struct acpi_iort_its_group *)node->node_data;
>> +	if (idx > its->its_count) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "requested ITS ID index [%d] is greater than available[%d]\n",
>> +			idx, its->its_count);
>> +		return -ENXIO;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	*its_id = its->identifiers[idx];
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * iort_pci_get_msi_domain_handle() - find registered domain token related to
>> + *                                    PCI device
>
> Broken comment.

Will fix.

>
>> + * @pdev:    The PCI device
>> + * @req_id:  The PCI device requester ID
>> + *
>> + * Returns: the MSI domain for this device, NULL otherwise
>> + */
>> +struct irq_domain *
>> +iort_pci_get_domain(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 req_id)
>
> Again: does this have to be PCI specific?

Here struct device can be used as well.

Thanks,
Tomasz

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-07 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-31 11:19 [PATCH V5 0/7] Introduce ACPI world to ITS irqchip Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 1/7] ARM64, ACPI, PCI: I/O Remapping Table (IORT) initial support Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-04 11:15   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-04 11:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-07 14:34     ` Tomasz Nowicki [this message]
2016-06-07 14:34       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-07 16:25       ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-07 16:25         ` Marc Zyngier
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 2/7] acpi, pci: Setup MSI domain on a per-devices basis Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 3/7] irqchip, GICv3, ITS: Cleanup for ITS domain initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 4/7] irqchip, GICv3, ITS: Refator ITS DT init code to prepare for ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 5/7] irqchip, gicv3, its: Probe ITS in the ACPI way Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-04 11:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-04 11:55     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-07 16:07     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-07 16:07       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 6/7] its, pci, msi: Factor out code that might be reused for ACPI Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19 ` [PATCH V5 7/7] acpi, gicv3, its: Use MADT ITS subtable to do PCI/MSI domain initialization Tomasz Nowicki
2016-05-31 11:19   ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-04 12:07   ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-04 12:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2016-06-07 16:12     ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-07 16:12       ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-07 16:12       ` Tomasz Nowicki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5756DB5A.4080901@semihalf.com \
    --to=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=andrea.gallo@linaro.org \
    --cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mw@semihalf.com \
    --cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=shijie.huang@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.