All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NFS option parsing bit-rot.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:51:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57589359.5020507@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <615FD41F-9C7D-4BAA-8BC5-D1F3CA115A8E@primarydata.com>

On 06/08/2016 03:35 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>=20
>=20
> On 6/8/16, 15:41, "Rob Landley" <rob@landley.net> wrote:
>>So addr=3D is at _best_ redundant. You MUST supply host:/ always,
>>the current code just wasn't using it.
>=20
> That=E2=80=99s because you just happen to be supplying an IP address inst=
ead of
> a hostname. The kernel has no DNS resolving functionality. It cannot
> resolve hostnames into IP addresses without help either by the caller or
> by means of an upcall. That is why =E2=80=98addr=3D=E2=80=99 has been a m=
andatory
> parameter ever since we introduced the text based parser.

Then why is host: mandatory in the dev name?

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	"linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix NFS option parsing bit-rot.
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 16:51:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57589359.5020507@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <615FD41F-9C7D-4BAA-8BC5-D1F3CA115A8E@primarydata.com>

On 06/08/2016 03:35 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/8/16, 15:41, "Rob Landley" <rob@landley.net> wrote:
>>So addr= is at _best_ redundant. You MUST supply host:/ always,
>>the current code just wasn't using it.
> 
> That’s because you just happen to be supplying an IP address instead of
> a hostname. The kernel has no DNS resolving functionality. It cannot
> resolve hostnames into IP addresses without help either by the caller or
> by means of an upcall. That is why ‘addr=’ has been a mandatory
> parameter ever since we introduced the text based parser.

Then why is host: mandatory in the dev name?

Rob

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-08 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-06 22:58 [PATCH] Fix NFS option parsing bit-rot Rob Landley
2016-06-06 23:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-06 23:49   ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 19:41   ` Rob Landley
2016-06-08 20:35     ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 20:35       ` Trond Myklebust
2016-06-08 21:51       ` Rob Landley [this message]
2016-06-08 21:51         ` Rob Landley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57589359.5020507@landley.net \
    --to=rob@landley.net \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trondmy@primarydata.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.