From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
eric.auger@linaro.org,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Baptiste Reynal <b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 5/8] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:41:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575E2B50.3040000@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iHxtL3cZVymfz0BqCGjBeBAuEyMXwj5sNBvMQQXgm8rg@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/8/2016 6:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
>> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
>>
>> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
>> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device. _RST method is
>> expected to stop DMA transfers and IRQs.
>>
>> This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
>> method when reset is requested.
>
A little bit of misinformation here. The current code is checking the presence
during probe time. If the presence of _RST method is required then probe is
aborted. Otherwise, probe will complete execution.
When reset call is to be executed, presence of _RST method is no longer checked.
Instead, the method is directly called.
I was talking about the contribution of this patch as both here. I'll clarify
the commit message.
> You could check if _RST is present at probe time and store the ACPI
> handle of it instead of the HID pointer.
>
> This way you wouldn't need to repeat that check every time reset is used.
>
Based on the requirement that the code can be executed without the presence
of _RST method for development purposes, I'm hesitant to use the handle of the
reset method as a gating factor.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V6 5/8] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:41:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575E2B50.3040000@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iHxtL3cZVymfz0BqCGjBeBAuEyMXwj5sNBvMQQXgm8rg@mail.gmail.com>
On 6/8/2016 6:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>> The device tree code checks for the presence of a reset driver and calls
>> the of_reset function pointer by looking up the reset driver as a module.
>>
>> ACPI defines _RST method to perform device level reset. After the _RST
>> method is executed, the OS can resume using the device. _RST method is
>> expected to stop DMA transfers and IRQs.
>>
>> This patch checks the presence of _RST method and calls the _RST
>> method when reset is requested.
>
A little bit of misinformation here. The current code is checking the presence
during probe time. If the presence of _RST method is required then probe is
aborted. Otherwise, probe will complete execution.
When reset call is to be executed, presence of _RST method is no longer checked.
Instead, the method is directly called.
I was talking about the contribution of this patch as both here. I'll clarify
the commit message.
> You could check if _RST is present at probe time and store the ACPI
> handle of it instead of the HID pointer.
>
> This way you wouldn't need to repeat that check every time reset is used.
>
Based on the requirement that the code can be executed without the presence
of _RST method for development purposes, I'm hesitant to use the handle of the
reset method as a gating factor.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-28 22:01 [PATCH V6 0/8] vfio, platform: add ACPI support Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 1/8] vfio: platform: move reset call to a common function Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 2/8] vfio: platform: determine reset capability Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 3/8] vfio: platform: add support for ACPI probe Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 4/8] vfio: platform: add extra debug info argument to call reset Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 5/8] vfio: platform: call _RST method when using ACPI Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-07 20:14 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:14 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:14 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-08 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-08 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-09 2:33 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-09 2:33 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-13 3:41 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-06-13 3:41 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 6/8] vfio, platform: make reset driver a requirement by default Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-07 19:59 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 19:59 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-13 2:32 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-13 2:32 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 7/8] vfio: platform: check reset call return code during open Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-07 20:21 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:21 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-13 3:12 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-13 3:12 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` [PATCH V6 8/8] vfio: platform: check reset call return code during release Sinan Kaya
2016-05-28 22:01 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-07 20:28 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:28 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:28 ` Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:37 ` [PATCH V6 0/8] vfio, platform: add ACPI support Auger Eric
2016-06-07 20:37 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575E2B50.3040000@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=b.reynal@virtualopensystems.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=eric.auger@linaro.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.