All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: harish.srinivasappa@intel.com, lukasz.odzioba@intel.com,
	grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com, lukasz.daniluk@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Linux VM workaround for Knights Landing A/D leak
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:24:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57603DC0.9070607@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465923672-14232-1-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>

On 06/14/2016 10:01 AM, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> v2 (Lukasz Anaczkowski):
>     () fixed compilation breakage
...

By unconditionally defining the workaround code, even on kernels where
there is no chance of ever hitting this bug.  I think that's a pretty
poor way to do it.

Can we please stick this in one of the intel.c files, so it's only
present on CPU_SUP_INTEL builds?

Which reminds me...

> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,12 @@ extern void cleanup_highmap(void);
>  extern void init_extra_mapping_uc(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
>  extern void init_extra_mapping_wb(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
>  
> +#define ARCH_HAS_NEEDS_SWAP_PTL 1
> +static inline bool arch_needs_swap_ptl(void)
> +{
> +       return boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_PTE_LEAK);
> +}

Does this *REALLY* only affect 64-bit kernels?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukasz Anaczkowski <lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, mhocko@suse.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com
Cc: harish.srinivasappa@intel.com, lukasz.odzioba@intel.com,
	grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com, lukasz.daniluk@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Linux VM workaround for Knights Landing A/D leak
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:24:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57603DC0.9070607@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465923672-14232-1-git-send-email-lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com>

On 06/14/2016 10:01 AM, Lukasz Anaczkowski wrote:
> v2 (Lukasz Anaczkowski):
>     () fixed compilation breakage
...

By unconditionally defining the workaround code, even on kernels where
there is no chance of ever hitting this bug.  I think that's a pretty
poor way to do it.

Can we please stick this in one of the intel.c files, so it's only
present on CPU_SUP_INTEL builds?

Which reminds me...

> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_64.h
> @@ -178,6 +178,12 @@ extern void cleanup_highmap(void);
>  extern void init_extra_mapping_uc(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
>  extern void init_extra_mapping_wb(unsigned long phys, unsigned long size);
>  
> +#define ARCH_HAS_NEEDS_SWAP_PTL 1
> +static inline bool arch_needs_swap_ptl(void)
> +{
> +       return boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_PTE_LEAK);
> +}

Does this *REALLY* only affect 64-bit kernels?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-14 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 15:58 [PATCH] Linux VM workaround for Knights Landing A/D leak Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-14 15:58 ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-14 16:31 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 16:31   ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 16:47 ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 16:47   ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 16:54   ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-14 16:54     ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-14 17:01   ` [PATCH v2] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-14 17:01     ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-14 17:24     ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2016-06-14 17:24       ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 18:34       ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-06-14 18:34         ` One Thousand Gnomes
2016-06-14 18:54         ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 18:54           ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 19:19           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-14 19:19             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-14 20:20             ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-06-14 20:47               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-14 20:54                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-06-14 21:02                   ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-14 21:08                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-06-14 21:13                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2016-06-14 18:10     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-14 18:10       ` Borislav Petkov
2016-06-15 13:12       ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-15 13:12         ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-14 18:38     ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 18:38       ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15 13:12       ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-15 13:12         ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-15 20:04         ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15 20:04           ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15 20:10           ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-15 20:10             ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-15 20:26             ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15 20:26               ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-16 15:14     ` [PATCH v3] " Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-16 15:14       ` Lukasz Anaczkowski
2016-06-16 16:43       ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-16 16:43         ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-16 20:23       ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-16 20:23         ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 17:18   ` [PATCH] " Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 17:18     ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 20:16     ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 20:16       ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 21:37       ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 21:37         ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-15  2:20         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  2:20           ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  2:35           ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15  2:35             ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15  2:36             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  2:36               ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  2:44               ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15  2:44                 ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15  3:09                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  3:09                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-15  3:20         ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-15  3:20           ` Nadav Amit
2016-06-14 16:58 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 16:58   ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 17:19 ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-14 17:19   ` Dave Hansen
2016-06-15 13:06   ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-15 13:06     ` Anaczkowski, Lukasz
2016-06-14 17:47 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-14 17:47   ` kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57603DC0.9070607@linux.intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=grzegorz.andrejczuk@intel.com \
    --cc=harish.srinivasappa@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lukasz.anaczkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=lukasz.daniluk@intel.com \
    --cc=lukasz.odzioba@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.