From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:51:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5762D90D.8090303@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160616164311.GH5827@arm.com>
On 16/06/16 17:43, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:28:50PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> +static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu, finalcpu, ret;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>> +
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + /*
>> + * We were unable to put down sysfs groups for all the CPUs, revert
>> + * all the groups we have placed down s.t. none are visible.
>> + * Otherwise we could give a misleading picture of what's present.
>> + */
>> + finalcpu = cpu;
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (cpu == finalcpu)
>> + break;
>> + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> + if (dev)
>> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
>
> Given that you're built the sysfs entries out of the present mask, don't
> you need a hotplug notifier to keep things up to date?
We already check if the CPU is present at runtime before we give out the data.
+#define CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(_name) \
+ static ssize_t show_##_name (struct device *dev, \
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
+ { \
+ struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, dev->id); \
+ if (!cpu_present(dev->id)) \
+ return -ENODEV; \
+ \
Did you mean to check online/offline ?
Cheers
Suzuki
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steve.capper@linaro.org,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:51:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5762D90D.8090303@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160616164311.GH5827@arm.com>
On 16/06/16 17:43, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:28:50PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> +static int __init cpuinfo_regs_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int cpu, finalcpu, ret;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + cpu_hotplug_disable();
>> +
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> +
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = sysfs_create_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> + if (ret)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!ret)
>> + goto out;
>> + /*
>> + * We were unable to put down sysfs groups for all the CPUs, revert
>> + * all the groups we have placed down s.t. none are visible.
>> + * Otherwise we could give a misleading picture of what's present.
>> + */
>> + finalcpu = cpu;
>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>> + if (cpu == finalcpu)
>> + break;
>> + dev = get_cpu_device(cpu);
>> + if (dev)
>> + sysfs_remove_group(&dev->kobj, &cpuregs_attr_group);
>> + }
>> +
>> +out:
>> + cpu_hotplug_enable();
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +device_initcall(cpuinfo_regs_init);
>
> Given that you're built the sysfs entries out of the present mask, don't
> you need a hotplug notifier to keep things up to date?
We already check if the CPU is present at runtime before we give out the data.
+#define CPUINFO_ATTR_RO(_name) \
+ static ssize_t show_##_name (struct device *dev, \
+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
+ { \
+ struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info = &per_cpu(cpu_data, dev->id); \
+ if (!cpu_present(dev->id)) \
+ return -ENODEV; \
+ \
Did you mean to check online/offline ?
Cheers
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-16 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-16 13:28 [PATCH v5] arm64: cpuinfo: Expose MIDR_EL1 and REVIDR_EL1 to sysfs Suzuki K Poulose
2016-06-16 13:28 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2016-06-16 16:43 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-16 16:43 ` Will Deacon
2016-06-16 16:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2016-06-16 16:51 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5762D90D.8090303@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.