From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:59:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57639FE3.3080502@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5763215D.4040600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/16/2016 11:59 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 09:35 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 06/15/2016 01:34 PM, Brian King wrote:
>>> [...] did you ever try to reproduce this with an
>>> upstream
>>> kernel?
>
>> Now that the topic is under discussion, I've asked for some time slots
>> on that system, so we can test an upstream kernel and try to reproduce
>> the problem and analyze it more closely.
>
> The problem is not reproducible w/ 4.7.0-rc3 even after a few hours;
> it is instantly reproducible w/ 3.12.57-60.35 (SLES 12 SP1 updates).
>
> Hannes et al,
>
> If you'd like some data collection from this system, feel free to ping
> me about it.
>
Ouch.
Okay, continue discussion on the SUSE bugzilla.
Guess we've missed some backports then.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N�rnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend�rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N�rnberg)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira <mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>, Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu
Subject: Re: block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:59:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57639FE3.3080502@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5763215D.4040600@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 06/16/2016 11:59 PM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 09:35 AM, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 06/15/2016 01:34 PM, Brian King wrote:
>>> [...] did you ever try to reproduce this with an
>>> upstream
>>> kernel?
>
>> Now that the topic is under discussion, I've asked for some time slots
>> on that system, so we can test an upstream kernel and try to reproduce
>> the problem and analyze it more closely.
>
> The problem is not reproducible w/ 4.7.0-rc3 even after a few hours;
> it is instantly reproducible w/ 3.12.57-60.35 (SLES 12 SP1 updates).
>
> Hannes et al,
>
> If you'd like some data collection from this system, feel free to ping
> me about it.
>
Ouch.
Okay, continue discussion on the SUSE bugzilla.
Guess we've missed some backports then.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-17 6:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-30 7:24 [PATCH] block: don't check request size in blk_cloned_rq_check_limits() Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 13:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-10 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 13:30 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-10 14:18 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-11 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 10:05 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 2:22 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 10:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 10:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 11:06 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-11 13:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-11 13:10 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-13 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-15 1:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15 2:29 ` Mike Snitzer
2016-06-15 2:32 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-06-15 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 6:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 10:03 ` Jens Axboe
2016-06-15 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 10:33 ` Hannes Reinecke
2016-06-15 16:34 ` Brian King
2016-06-16 12:35 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-16 21:59 ` Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
2016-06-17 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2016-06-17 6:59 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57639FE3.3080502@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.bergman@uphs.upenn.edu \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mauricfo@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.