From: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: Add operating-points-v2 tables for TI platforms
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:57:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5768206A.5050501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160611024400.GE27439@vireshk-i7>
On 06/10/2016 09:44 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-06-16, 09:50, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 06/10/2016 06:04 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [160518 21:49]:
>>>> On 18-05-16, 18:36, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> This series adds operating-points-v2 tables for am335x, am437x, dra7xx,
>>>>> and am57xx based platforms along with some support patches so that we
>>>>> can enable more OPPs for the CPU on these platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches rely on the ti-cpufreq series sent here [1] and provide
>>>>> opp-supported-hw data for each OPP so that only the appropriate OPPs
>>>>> for a specific piece of silicon get enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Applying all the dts changes into omap-for-v4.8/dt thanks.
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>> Viresh, are we ready with the cpufreq series?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122961/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122921/
>>
>> Also current series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9123071/
>> Seems to have comments pending.
>>
>> Dave is on vacation for another week or so, doubt he can respond in
>> time -> Should we wait on this series till we get the cpufreq support in?
>
> Rafael handles all the merges, etc. It would be better if you can
> reply to that thread instead.
>
Sorry for the delay responding here, the only issue with this series
would be that we haven't received an ACK on the DT binding doc from
cpufreq series [1] from a DT maintainer, so if comments are received
there these patches could potentially change. I had pinged but still no
response either way.
Regards,
Dave
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122921/
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: d-gerlach@ti.com (Dave Gerlach)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: Add operating-points-v2 tables for TI platforms
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:57:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5768206A.5050501@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160611024400.GE27439@vireshk-i7>
On 06/10/2016 09:44 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-06-16, 09:50, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 06/10/2016 06:04 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> [160518 21:49]:
>>>> On 18-05-16, 18:36, Dave Gerlach wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> This series adds operating-points-v2 tables for am335x, am437x, dra7xx,
>>>>> and am57xx based platforms along with some support patches so that we
>>>>> can enable more OPPs for the CPU on these platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> These patches rely on the ti-cpufreq series sent here [1] and provide
>>>>> opp-supported-hw data for each OPP so that only the appropriate OPPs
>>>>> for a specific piece of silicon get enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> Applying all the dts changes into omap-for-v4.8/dt thanks.
>>>
>>> Tony
>>>
>> Viresh, are we ready with the cpufreq series?
>>
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122961/
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122921/
>>
>> Also current series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9123071/
>> Seems to have comments pending.
>>
>> Dave is on vacation for another week or so, doubt he can respond in
>> time -> Should we wait on this series till we get the cpufreq support in?
>
> Rafael handles all the merges, etc. It would be better if you can
> reply to that thread instead.
>
Sorry for the delay responding here, the only issue with this series
would be that we haven't received an ACK on the DT binding doc from
cpufreq series [1] from a DT maintainer, so if comments are received
there these patches could potentially change. I had pinged but still no
response either way.
Regards,
Dave
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9122921/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 16:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-18 23:36 [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: Add operating-points-v2 tables for TI platforms Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
[not found] ` <cover.1463606963.git.d-gerlach-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/8] ARM: dts: am335x: Update MPU regulator range for TI boards Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 6/8] ARM: dts: dra7: Add dt node for the syscon control module wkup Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 2/8] ARM: dts: am33xx: Move to operating-points-v2 table and ti-cpufreq driver Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-19 4:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-05-19 4:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 3/8] ARM: dts: am335x-boneblack: Enable 1GHz OPP for cpu Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] ARM: dts: am4372: Add operating-points-v2 table Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/8] ARM: dts: am437x-gp-evm: Hook dcdc2 as the cpu0-supply Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 7/8] ARM: dts: dra7: Move cpus node to parent dts for dra74x and dra72x Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` [PATCH 8/8] ARM: dts: dra7: Move to operating-points-v2 table Dave Gerlach
2016-05-18 23:36 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-05-19 4:47 ` [PATCH 0/8] ARM: dts: Add operating-points-v2 tables for TI platforms Viresh Kumar
2016-05-19 4:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-10 11:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-06-10 11:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-06-10 14:50 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-06-10 14:50 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-06-11 2:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-11 2:44 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-06-20 16:57 ` Dave Gerlach [this message]
2016-06-20 16:57 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-09-01 2:46 ` Dave Gerlach
2016-09-01 2:46 ` Dave Gerlach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5768206A.5050501@ti.com \
--to=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=yegorslists@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.