From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:30:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <576A144D.90007@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466478746-14153-4-git-send-email-bsd@redhat.com>
On 06/21/2016 11:12 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
> To support execute only mappings on behalf of L1 hypervisors,
> we teach set_spte to honor L1's valid XWR bits. This is only
> if host supports EPT execute only. Use ACC_USER_MASK to signify
> if the L1 hypervisor has the present bit set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 11 ++++++++---
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index 57d8696..3ca1a99 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -2528,7 +2528,8 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> if (set_mmio_spte(vcpu, sptep, gfn, pfn, pte_access))
> return 0;
>
> - spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> + if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
> + spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
The xonly info can be fetched from vcpu->mmu. shadow_xonly_valid looks like
can be dropped.
> if (!speculative)
> spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
>
> @@ -2537,8 +2538,12 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
> else
> spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
>
> - if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
> - spte |= shadow_user_mask;
> + if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
> + if (shadow_xonly_valid)
> + spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> + else
> + spte |= shadow_user_mask;
> + }
It can be simplified by setting shadow_user_mask to PT_PRESENT_MASK
if ept enabled.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 4:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 3:12 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mmu: add a boolean to indicate host ept execute only support Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mmu: Update ept specific valid bit values Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 4:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:10 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:23 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:30 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] vmx: advertise support for ept execute only Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:34 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-23 5:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 2:56 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 4:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 4:50 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 6:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 7:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 16:19 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=576A144D.90007@linux.intel.com \
--to=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.