From: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 12:23:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jpgk2hh5h18.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d8f198c9-5980-610f-a825-4a28012e4c86@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2016 18:12:01 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 22/06/2016 18:10, Bandan Das wrote:
>>>> >> + if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
>>>> >> + spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
>>>> >> if (!speculative)
>>>> >> spte |= shadow_accessed_mask;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> @@ -2537,8 +2538,12 @@ static int set_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
>>>> >> else
>>>> >> spte |= shadow_nx_mask;
>>>> >>
>>>> >> - if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
>>>> >> - spte |= shadow_user_mask;
>>>> >> + if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
>>>> >> + if (shadow_xonly_valid)
>>>> >> + spte |= PT_PRESENT_MASK;
>>>> >> + else
>>>> >> + spte |= shadow_user_mask;
>>>> >> + }
>>> >
>>> > Can you instead pass VMX_READABLE_MASK to kvm_mmu_set_mask_ptes in vmx.c?
>> So, leave spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK as is and make VMX_READABLE_MASK 1ULL if
>> execute only is supported ?
>> And then :
>> if !(pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK) {
>> spte &= ~VMX_READABLE_MASK
>>
>
> No, I meant something like
>
> spte = 0;
> if (!shadow_xonly_valid)
> spte = PT_PRESENT_MASK;
> ...
> if (pte_access & ACC_USER_MASK)
> spte |= shadow_user_mask;
Ok, Xiao mentioned this too. I will fix it in the next version.
Thanks for the review.
> Paolo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-21 3:12 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] mmu: add a boolean to indicate host ept execute only support Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] mmu: Update ept specific valid bit values Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 4:09 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] mmu: don't set the present bit unconditionally Bandan Das
2016-06-21 8:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-21 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:10 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-22 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-22 16:23 ` Bandan Das [this message]
2016-06-22 4:30 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:21 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-21 3:12 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] vmx: advertise support for ept execute only Bandan Das
2016-06-22 4:39 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add support for EPT execute only for nested hypervisors Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-22 16:34 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-23 5:03 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 2:56 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 4:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 4:50 ` Bandan Das
2016-06-24 6:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-06-24 7:02 ` Xiao Guangrong
2016-06-24 16:19 ` Bandan Das
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jpgk2hh5h18.fsf@linux.bootlegged.copy \
--to=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.