All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com>, Sunil <sunil.vl@hpe.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:06:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57714106.2040200@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577140A7.60904@linaro.org>



On 27/06/16 16:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/27/2016 05:03 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 27/06/16 15:33, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2016 04:48 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> Now that ACPI processor idle driver supports LPI(Low Power Idle), lets
>>>> enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE for ARM64 too.
>>>>
>>>> This patch just removes the IA64 and X86 dependency on
>>>> ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
>>>>
>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi Sudeep,
>>>
>>> now that ACPI processor supports ARM64 did you check the
>>> CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START trick in the code and its derivative ?
>>>
>>
>> No, that is used only for C-State and ARM64 doesn't support it.
>> Patch 1/5 puts all the C-State code under #ifdef so that it's not
>> compiled on ARM64.
>>
>>> I deleted the patch 2/5 but there is a place where:
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't follow what you mean by that.
>
> I meant I just deleted from my mailbox the patch 2/5, so I can't do
> inline comment.
>

Ah ok, anyways LPI always starts from index 0. IIUC that was your main
concern.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 16:06:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57714106.2040200@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <577140A7.60904@linaro.org>



On 27/06/16 16:05, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/27/2016 05:03 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> On 27/06/16 15:33, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 06/14/2016 04:48 PM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>>> Now that ACPI processor idle driver supports LPI(Low Power Idle), lets
>>>> enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE for ARM64 too.
>>>>
>>>> This patch just removes the IA64 and X86 dependency on
>>>> ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE
>>>>
>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Hi Sudeep,
>>>
>>> now that ACPI processor supports ARM64 did you check the
>>> CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START trick in the code and its derivative ?
>>>
>>
>> No, that is used only for C-State and ARM64 doesn't support it.
>> Patch 1/5 puts all the C-State code under #ifdef so that it's not
>> compiled on ARM64.
>>
>>> I deleted the patch 2/5 but there is a place where:
>>>
>>
>> Sorry, I don't follow what you mean by that.
>
> I meant I just deleted from my mailbox the patch 2/5, so I can't do
> inline comment.
>

Ah ok, anyways LPI always starts from index 0. IIUC that was your main
concern.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-27 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-14 14:48 [PATCH v6 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 16:47   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 16:54   ` [PATCH v6 2/5][UPDATED] " Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] arm64: cpuidle: drop __init section marker to arm_cpuidle_init Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-22 16:09   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-22 16:09     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-14 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-22 14:17   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-22 14:17     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-06-24 21:04     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-24 21:04       ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-24 21:04       ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-24 22:47       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-24 22:47         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-25  8:05         ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-25  8:05           ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27  9:50       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27  9:50         ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 16:29     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 16:29       ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 16:29       ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 17:07       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 17:07         ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 17:58         ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 17:58           ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
2016-06-14 14:48   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 14:33   ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 14:33     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 14:33     ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:03     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 15:03       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 15:05       ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:05         ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:05         ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:06         ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-06-27 15:06           ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 15:08           ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:08             ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:11             ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 15:11               ` Sudeep Holla
2016-06-27 15:12               ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:12                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-27 15:12                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-06-22 17:45 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-06-23  0:42   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-06-25  0:23     ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57714106.2040200@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sunil.vl@hpe.com \
    --cc=vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.