* [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device()
@ 2016-06-29 20:14 Richard Weinberger
2016-07-04 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2016-06-29 20:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: computersforpeace; +Cc: dwmw2, linux-mtd, linux-kernel, Richard Weinberger
If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
will never issue the registered callbacks.
Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down.
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
---
Hi!
I've found this issue while heavily reworking nandsim.
With my changes applied you can add/remove MTD's during
runtime. I figured that nandsim's refcounting goes nuts.
After tracking down the root cause I figured that
_get/put_device() has no effect on MTD slaves.
Thanks,
//richard
---
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
index 1f13e32..938dbeb 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
@@ -317,6 +317,19 @@ static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
return res;
}
+static int part_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
+ return part->master->_get_device(part->master);
+}
+
+static void part_put_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
+{
+ struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
+ part->master->_put_device(part->master);
+}
+
+
static int part_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
{
@@ -463,6 +476,12 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
slave->mtd._block_isbad = part_block_isbad;
if (master->_block_markbad)
slave->mtd._block_markbad = part_block_markbad;
+
+ if (master->_get_device)
+ slave->mtd._get_device = part_get_device;
+ if (master->_put_device)
+ slave->mtd._put_device = part_put_device;
+
slave->mtd._erase = part_erase;
slave->master = master;
slave->offset = part->offset;
--
2.7.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device()
2016-06-29 20:14 [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device() Richard Weinberger
@ 2016-07-04 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-04 9:40 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-07-04 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: computersforpeace, linux-mtd, dwmw2, linux-kernel
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:14:23 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
> If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
> and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
> will never issue the registered callbacks.
> Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Nit below, otherwise it looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Hi!
>
> I've found this issue while heavily reworking nandsim.
> With my changes applied you can add/remove MTD's during
> runtime. I figured that nandsim's refcounting goes nuts.
> After tracking down the root cause I figured that
> _get/put_device() has no effect on MTD slaves.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> index 1f13e32..938dbeb 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,19 @@ static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> return res;
> }
>
> +static int part_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> + return part->master->_get_device(part->master);
> +}
> +
> +static void part_put_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> +{
> + struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> + part->master->_put_device(part->master);
> +}
> +
> +
Extra blank line here.
> static int part_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
> {
> @@ -463,6 +476,12 @@ static struct mtd_part *allocate_partition(struct mtd_info *master,
> slave->mtd._block_isbad = part_block_isbad;
> if (master->_block_markbad)
> slave->mtd._block_markbad = part_block_markbad;
> +
> + if (master->_get_device)
> + slave->mtd._get_device = part_get_device;
> + if (master->_put_device)
> + slave->mtd._put_device = part_put_device;
> +
> slave->mtd._erase = part_erase;
> slave->master = master;
> slave->offset = part->offset;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device()
2016-07-04 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-07-04 9:40 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2016-07-04 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Brezillon; +Cc: computersforpeace, linux-mtd, dwmw2, linux-kernel
Boris,
Am 04.07.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Boris Brezillon:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 22:14:23 +0200
> Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>
>> If the master device has callbacks for _get/put_device()
>> and this MTD has slaves a get_mtd_device() call on paritions
>> will never issue the registered callbacks.
>> Fix this by propergating _get/put_device() down.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>
> Nit below, otherwise it looks good to me:
>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Will send a v2 without the extra blank line and the typo
in the commit message. :)
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-07-04 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-06-29 20:14 [PATCH] mtdpart: propagate _get/put_device() Richard Weinberger
2016-07-04 9:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-07-04 9:40 ` Richard Weinberger
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.