All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mugunthanvnm@ti.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add ethtool channels support
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:33:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577FAB95.9010407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467313478-22919-5-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>

On 06/30/2016 10:04 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> These ops allow to control number of channels driver is allowed to
> work with. The maximum number of channels is 8 for rx and 8 for tx.
> After this patch the following commands are possible:
> 
> $ ethtool -l eth0
> $ ethtool -L eth0 rx 6 tx 6


Could you add some description here about switch vs dual_mac behavior? 

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 188 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 595ed56..729b8be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -740,6 +740,11 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
>   	}
>   
>   requeue:
> +	if (netif_dormant(ndev)) {
> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	ch = priv->rxch[skb_get_queue_mapping(new_skb)];
>   	ret = cpdma_chan_submit(ch, new_skb, new_skb->data,
>   				skb_tailroom(new_skb), 0);
> @@ -2077,6 +2082,187 @@ static void cpsw_ethtool_op_complete(struct net_device *ndev)
>   		cpsw_err(priv, drv, "ethtool complete failed %d\n", ret);
>   }
>   
> +static void cpsw_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> +			      struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	ch->max_combined = 0;
> +	ch->max_rx = CPSW_MAX_QUEUES;
> +	ch->max_tx = CPSW_MAX_QUEUES;
> +	ch->max_other = 0;
> +	ch->other_count = 0;
> +	ch->rx_count = priv->rx_ch_num;
> +	ch->tx_count = priv->tx_ch_num;
> +	ch->combined_count = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_check_ch_settings(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
> +				  struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	if (ch->combined_count)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* verify we have at least one channel in each direction */
> +	if (!ch->rx_count || !ch->tx_count)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (ch->rx_count > priv->data.channels ||
> +	    ch->tx_count > priv->data.channels)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cpsw_sync_dual_ch_list(struct net_device *sdev,
> +				   struct net_device *ddev)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv_s, *priv_d;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	priv_s = netdev_priv(sdev);
> +	priv_d = netdev_priv(ddev);
> +
> +	priv_d->rx_ch_num = priv_s->rx_ch_num;
> +	priv_d->tx_ch_num = priv_s->tx_ch_num;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv_d->tx_ch_num; i++)
> +		priv_d->txch[i] = priv_s->txch[i];
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv_d->rx_ch_num; i++)
> +		priv_d->rxch[i] = priv_s->rxch[i];
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_update_channels_res(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch_num, int rx)
> +{
> +	int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int);
> +	void (*handler)(void *, int, int);
> +	struct cpdma_chan **chan;
> +	int *ch;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (rx) {
> +		ch = &priv->rx_ch_num;
> +		chan = priv->rxch;
> +		handler = cpsw_rx_handler;
> +		poll = cpsw_rx_poll;
> +	} else {
> +		ch = &priv->tx_ch_num;
> +		chan = priv->txch;
> +		handler = cpsw_tx_handler;
> +		poll = cpsw_tx_poll;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (*ch < ch_num) {
> +		chan[*ch] = cpdma_chan_create(priv->dma, *ch, handler, rx);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(chan[*ch]))
> +			return PTR_ERR(chan[*ch]);
> +
> +		if (!chan[*ch])
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		dev_info(priv->dev, "created new %d %s channel\n", *ch,
> +			 (rx ? "rx" : "tx"));
> +		(*ch)++;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (*ch > ch_num) {
> +		int tch = *ch - 1;

why tch? can you use more informative names

> +
> +		ret = cpdma_chan_destroy(chan[tch]);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		dev_info(priv->dev, "destroyed %d %s channel\n", tch,
> +			 (rx ? "rx" : "tx"));
> +		(*ch)--;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_update_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> +				struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels_res(priv, ch->rx_count, 1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels_res(priv, ch->tx_count, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (priv->data.dual_emac) {
> +		int i;
> +		/* mirror channels for another SL */
> +		for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
> +			if (priv->slaves[i].ndev == dev)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			cpsw_sync_dual_ch_list(dev, priv->slaves[i].ndev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_set_channels(struct net_device *ndev,
> +			     struct ethtool_channels *chs)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_check_ch_settings(priv, chs);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> +		netif_tx_stop_all_queues(ndev);
> +		cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
> +		netif_dormant_on(ndev);
> +		cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels(ndev, chs);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> +		/* inform stach about new count of queues */
> +		ret = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, priv->tx_ch_num);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot set real number of tx queues\n");
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(ndev, priv->rx_ch_num);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot set real number of rx queues\n");
> +			goto err;
> +		}

You're synchronizing slaves channels for dual_mac mode above, but updating netif real_num_XY_queues()
only for current netdev. Is it correct?

> +
> +		netif_dormant_off(ndev);
> +
> +		if (cpsw_fill_rx_channels(ndev))
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		cpdma_ctlr_start(priv->dma);
> +		cpsw_intr_enable(priv);
> +		netif_tx_start_all_queues(ndev);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot update channels number, closing device\n");
> +	dev_close(ndev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct ethtool_ops cpsw_ethtool_ops = {
>   	.get_drvinfo	= cpsw_get_drvinfo,
>   	.get_msglevel	= cpsw_get_msglevel,
> @@ -2098,6 +2284,8 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops cpsw_ethtool_ops = {
>   	.get_regs	= cpsw_get_regs,
>   	.begin		= cpsw_ethtool_op_begin,
>   	.complete	= cpsw_ethtool_op_complete,
> +	.get_channels	= cpsw_get_channels,
> +	.set_channels	= cpsw_set_channels,
>   };
>   
>   static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
> 


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<mugunthanvnm@ti.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<nsekhar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add ethtool channels support
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:33:09 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577FAB95.9010407@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467313478-22919-5-git-send-email-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>

On 06/30/2016 10:04 PM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> These ops allow to control number of channels driver is allowed to
> work with. The maximum number of channels is 8 for rx and 8 for tx.
> After this patch the following commands are possible:
> 
> $ ethtool -l eth0
> $ ethtool -L eth0 rx 6 tx 6


Could you add some description here about switch vs dual_mac behavior? 

> 
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 188 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 595ed56..729b8be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -740,6 +740,11 @@ static void cpsw_rx_handler(void *token, int len, int status)
>   	}
>   
>   requeue:
> +	if (netif_dormant(ndev)) {
> +		dev_kfree_skb_any(new_skb);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>   	ch = priv->rxch[skb_get_queue_mapping(new_skb)];
>   	ret = cpdma_chan_submit(ch, new_skb, new_skb->data,
>   				skb_tailroom(new_skb), 0);
> @@ -2077,6 +2082,187 @@ static void cpsw_ethtool_op_complete(struct net_device *ndev)
>   		cpsw_err(priv, drv, "ethtool complete failed %d\n", ret);
>   }
>   
> +static void cpsw_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> +			      struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	ch->max_combined = 0;
> +	ch->max_rx = CPSW_MAX_QUEUES;
> +	ch->max_tx = CPSW_MAX_QUEUES;
> +	ch->max_other = 0;
> +	ch->other_count = 0;
> +	ch->rx_count = priv->rx_ch_num;
> +	ch->tx_count = priv->tx_ch_num;
> +	ch->combined_count = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_check_ch_settings(struct cpsw_priv *priv,
> +				  struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	if (ch->combined_count)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* verify we have at least one channel in each direction */
> +	if (!ch->rx_count || !ch->tx_count)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (ch->rx_count > priv->data.channels ||
> +	    ch->tx_count > priv->data.channels)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void cpsw_sync_dual_ch_list(struct net_device *sdev,
> +				   struct net_device *ddev)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv_s, *priv_d;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	priv_s = netdev_priv(sdev);
> +	priv_d = netdev_priv(ddev);
> +
> +	priv_d->rx_ch_num = priv_s->rx_ch_num;
> +	priv_d->tx_ch_num = priv_s->tx_ch_num;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv_d->tx_ch_num; i++)
> +		priv_d->txch[i] = priv_s->txch[i];
> +	for (i = 0; i < priv_d->rx_ch_num; i++)
> +		priv_d->rxch[i] = priv_s->rxch[i];
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_update_channels_res(struct cpsw_priv *priv, int ch_num, int rx)
> +{
> +	int (*poll)(struct napi_struct *, int);
> +	void (*handler)(void *, int, int);
> +	struct cpdma_chan **chan;
> +	int *ch;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (rx) {
> +		ch = &priv->rx_ch_num;
> +		chan = priv->rxch;
> +		handler = cpsw_rx_handler;
> +		poll = cpsw_rx_poll;
> +	} else {
> +		ch = &priv->tx_ch_num;
> +		chan = priv->txch;
> +		handler = cpsw_tx_handler;
> +		poll = cpsw_tx_poll;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (*ch < ch_num) {
> +		chan[*ch] = cpdma_chan_create(priv->dma, *ch, handler, rx);
> +
> +		if (IS_ERR(chan[*ch]))
> +			return PTR_ERR(chan[*ch]);
> +
> +		if (!chan[*ch])
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		dev_info(priv->dev, "created new %d %s channel\n", *ch,
> +			 (rx ? "rx" : "tx"));
> +		(*ch)++;
> +	}
> +
> +	while (*ch > ch_num) {
> +		int tch = *ch - 1;

why tch? can you use more informative names

> +
> +		ret = cpdma_chan_destroy(chan[tch]);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		dev_info(priv->dev, "destroyed %d %s channel\n", tch,
> +			 (rx ? "rx" : "tx"));
> +		(*ch)--;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_update_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> +				struct ethtool_channels *ch)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels_res(priv, ch->rx_count, 1);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels_res(priv, ch->tx_count, 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (priv->data.dual_emac) {
> +		int i;
> +		/* mirror channels for another SL */
> +		for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
> +			if (priv->slaves[i].ndev == dev)
> +				continue;
> +
> +			cpsw_sync_dual_ch_list(dev, priv->slaves[i].ndev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpsw_set_channels(struct net_device *ndev,
> +			     struct ethtool_channels *chs)
> +{
> +	struct cpsw_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_check_ch_settings(priv, chs);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> +		netif_tx_stop_all_queues(ndev);
> +		cpsw_intr_disable(priv);
> +		netif_dormant_on(ndev);
> +		cpdma_ctlr_stop(priv->dma);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = cpsw_update_channels(ndev, chs);
> +	if (ret)
> +		goto err;
> +
> +	if (netif_running(ndev)) {
> +		/* inform stach about new count of queues */
> +		ret = netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(ndev, priv->tx_ch_num);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot set real number of tx queues\n");
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		ret = netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(ndev, priv->rx_ch_num);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot set real number of rx queues\n");
> +			goto err;
> +		}

You're synchronizing slaves channels for dual_mac mode above, but updating netif real_num_XY_queues()
only for current netdev. Is it correct?

> +
> +		netif_dormant_off(ndev);
> +
> +		if (cpsw_fill_rx_channels(ndev))
> +			goto err;
> +
> +		cpdma_ctlr_start(priv->dma);
> +		cpsw_intr_enable(priv);
> +		netif_tx_start_all_queues(ndev);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +err:
> +	dev_err(priv->dev, "cannot update channels number, closing device\n");
> +	dev_close(ndev);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   static const struct ethtool_ops cpsw_ethtool_ops = {
>   	.get_drvinfo	= cpsw_get_drvinfo,
>   	.get_msglevel	= cpsw_get_msglevel,
> @@ -2098,6 +2284,8 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops cpsw_ethtool_ops = {
>   	.get_regs	= cpsw_get_regs,
>   	.begin		= cpsw_ethtool_op_begin,
>   	.complete	= cpsw_ethtool_op_complete,
> +	.get_channels	= cpsw_get_channels,
> +	.set_channels	= cpsw_set_channels,
>   };
>   
>   static void cpsw_slave_init(struct cpsw_slave *slave, struct cpsw_priv *priv,
> 


-- 
regards,
-grygorii

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-30 19:04 [PATCH 0/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add multi-queue support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-06-30 19:04 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: split descs num between all channels Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-07-01 20:35   ` David Miller
2016-07-03  8:57     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-06-30 19:04 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add multi queue support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-07-08 13:12   ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-07-08 13:12     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-07-19 13:24     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-06-30 19:04 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: ethernet: ti: davinci_cpdma: move cpdma channel struct macroses to internals Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-06-30 19:04 ` [PATCH 4/4] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: add ethtool channels support Ivan Khoronzhuk
2016-07-08 13:33   ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2016-07-08 13:33     ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-07-19 13:39     ` Ivan Khoronzhuk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577FAB95.9010407@ti.com \
    --to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.