All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	ACPI List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Vikas Sajjan <vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com>, Sunil <sunil.vl@hpe.com>,
	PrashanthPrakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>,
	Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ALKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:21:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577FC50F.7010205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708144719.GI3784@red-moon>



On 08/07/16 15:47, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:10:50PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
>> (LPI) on ARM64.
>>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c |  18 +++++++
>>   drivers/firmware/psci.c     | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>
> I would split this patch in two (ARM64 cpuidle and PSCI)

Agreed, I combined it to get it functional in one go, but until we have
6/6, it won't work. So better to split that changes.

> and for
> the PSCI code (apologies, blame taken, it is entirely my fault) I
> think that the code in v6 was better, I asked you to factor out
> DT/ACPI idle states count and parameter retrieval but the end result
> is much more complicated than what it was in v6, so for PSCI ACPI
> idle states parsing I would revert to v6, apologies.
>

Yes I agree it got bit complicated. I will revert back to v6 for that part.


> With changes above:
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>

Thanks

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 16:21:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <577FC50F.7010205@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160708144719.GI3784@red-moon>



On 08/07/16 15:47, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 06:10:50PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
>> (LPI) on ARM64.
>>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c |  18 +++++++
>>   drivers/firmware/psci.c     | 122 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>
> I would split this patch in two (ARM64 cpuidle and PSCI)

Agreed, I combined it to get it functional in one go, but until we have
6/6, it won't work. So better to split that changes.

> and for
> the PSCI code (apologies, blame taken, it is entirely my fault) I
> think that the code in v6 was better, I asked you to factor out
> DT/ACPI idle states count and parameter retrieval but the end result
> is much more complicated than what it was in v6, so for PSCI ACPI
> idle states parsing I would revert to v6, apologies.
>

Yes I agree it got bit complicated. I will revert back to v6 for that part.


> With changes above:
>
> Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
>

Thanks

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-07 17:10 [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10 ` [PATCH v8 1/6] ACPI / processor_idle: introduce ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10   ` [PATCH v8 2/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10     ` [PATCH v8 3/6] arm64: cpuidle: drop __init section marker to arm_cpuidle_init Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10       ` [PATCH v8 4/6] cpuidle: introduce CPU_IDLE_ENTER_WRAPPED macro for ARM{32,64} Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10         ` [PATCH v8 4/6] cpuidle: introduce CPU_IDLE_ENTER_WRAPPED macro for ARM{32, 64} Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10         ` [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10           ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10           ` [PATCH v8 6/6] ACPI : enable ACPI_PROCESSOR_IDLE on ARM64 Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 17:10             ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-08 14:47           ` [PATCH v8 5/6] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI) Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-07-08 14:47             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-07-08 15:21             ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-07-08 15:21               ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-07 21:02 ` [PATCH v8 0/6] ACPI / processor_idle: Add ACPI v6.0 LPI support Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-07 21:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-07-08 11:04   ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-08 11:04     ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-08 14:43     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-07-08 14:43       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-07-08 15:19       ` Sudeep Holla
2016-07-08 15:19         ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=577FC50F.7010205@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pprakash@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sunil.vl@hpe.com \
    --cc=vikas.cha.sajjan@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.