From: Chen Gang <chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com,
rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: Use bool instead of int for the return value of PageMovable
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:50:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57851FC4.4000000@emindsoft.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160712074841.GE14586@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 7/12/16 15:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 12-07-16 03:47:42, Chen Gang wrote:
> [...]
>> In our case, the 2 output size are same, but under x86_64, the insns are
>> different. After uses bool, it uses push/pop instead of branch, for me,
>> it should be a little better for catching.
>
> The code generated for bool version looks much worse. Look at the fast
> path. Gcc tries to reuse the retq from the fast path in the bool case
> and so it has to push rbp and rbx on the stack.
>
> That being said, gcc doesn't seem to generate a better code for bool so
> I do not think this is really worth it.
>
The code below also merge 3 statements into 1 return statement, although
for me, it is a little more readable, it will generate a little bad code.
That is the reason why the output looks a little bad.
In our case, for gcc 6.0, using bool instead of int for bool function
will get the same output under x86_64.
In our case, for gcc 4.8, using bool instead of int for bool function
will get a little better output under x86_64.
Thanks.
>> The orig:
>>
>> 0000000000001290 <PageMovable>:
>> 1290: 48 8b 47 08 mov 0x8(%rdi),%rax
>> 1294: 83 e0 03 and $0x3,%eax
>> 1297: 48 83 f8 02 cmp $0x2,%rax
>> 129b: 74 03 je 12a0 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a0>
>> 129d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> 129f: c3 retq
>> 12a0: 55 push %rbp
>> 12a1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 12a4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 12a9 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a9>
>> 12a9: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12ac: 74 17 je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12ae: 48 8b 50 68 mov 0x68(%rax),%rdx
>> 12b2: 48 85 d2 test %rdx,%rdx
>> 12b5: 74 0e je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12b7: 48 83 7a 68 00 cmpq $0x0,0x68(%rdx)
>> 12bc: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
>> 12c1: 74 02 je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12c3: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c4: c3 retq
>> 12c5: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> 12c7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c8: c3 retq
>> 12c9: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
>>
>> The new:
>>
>> 0000000000001290 <PageMovable>:
>> 1290: 48 8b 47 08 mov 0x8(%rdi),%rax
>> 1294: 55 push %rbp
>> 1295: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 1298: 53 push %rbx
>> 1299: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx
>> 129b: 83 e0 03 and $0x3,%eax
>> 129e: 48 83 f8 02 cmp $0x2,%rax
>> 12a2: 74 05 je 12a9 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a9>
>> 12a4: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
>> 12a6: 5b pop %rbx
>> 12a7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12a8: c3 retq
>> 12a9: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 12ae <__SetPageMovable+0x12ae>
>> 12ae: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12b1: 74 f1 je 12a4 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a4>
>> 12b3: 48 8b 40 68 mov 0x68(%rax),%rax
>> 12b7: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12ba: 74 e8 je 12a4 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a4>
>> 12bc: 48 83 78 68 00 cmpq $0x0,0x68(%rax)
>> 12c1: 0f 95 c3 setne %bl
>> 12c4: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
>> 12c6: 5b pop %rbx
>> 12c7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c8: c3 retq
>> 12c9: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Chen Gang (e??a??)
>>
>> Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
>
--
Chen Gang (e??a??)
Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chen Gang <chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, vbabka@suse.cz,
mgorman@techsingularity.net, gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com, hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com,
rientjes@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: migrate: Use bool instead of int for the return value of PageMovable
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 00:50:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57851FC4.4000000@emindsoft.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160712074841.GE14586@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 7/12/16 15:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 12-07-16 03:47:42, Chen Gang wrote:
> [...]
>> In our case, the 2 output size are same, but under x86_64, the insns are
>> different. After uses bool, it uses push/pop instead of branch, for me,
>> it should be a little better for catching.
>
> The code generated for bool version looks much worse. Look at the fast
> path. Gcc tries to reuse the retq from the fast path in the bool case
> and so it has to push rbp and rbx on the stack.
>
> That being said, gcc doesn't seem to generate a better code for bool so
> I do not think this is really worth it.
>
The code below also merge 3 statements into 1 return statement, although
for me, it is a little more readable, it will generate a little bad code.
That is the reason why the output looks a little bad.
In our case, for gcc 6.0, using bool instead of int for bool function
will get the same output under x86_64.
In our case, for gcc 4.8, using bool instead of int for bool function
will get a little better output under x86_64.
Thanks.
>> The orig:
>>
>> 0000000000001290 <PageMovable>:
>> 1290: 48 8b 47 08 mov 0x8(%rdi),%rax
>> 1294: 83 e0 03 and $0x3,%eax
>> 1297: 48 83 f8 02 cmp $0x2,%rax
>> 129b: 74 03 je 12a0 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a0>
>> 129d: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> 129f: c3 retq
>> 12a0: 55 push %rbp
>> 12a1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 12a4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 12a9 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a9>
>> 12a9: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12ac: 74 17 je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12ae: 48 8b 50 68 mov 0x68(%rax),%rdx
>> 12b2: 48 85 d2 test %rdx,%rdx
>> 12b5: 74 0e je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12b7: 48 83 7a 68 00 cmpq $0x0,0x68(%rdx)
>> 12bc: b8 01 00 00 00 mov $0x1,%eax
>> 12c1: 74 02 je 12c5 <__SetPageMovable+0x12c5>
>> 12c3: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c4: c3 retq
>> 12c5: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
>> 12c7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c8: c3 retq
>> 12c9: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
>>
>> The new:
>>
>> 0000000000001290 <PageMovable>:
>> 1290: 48 8b 47 08 mov 0x8(%rdi),%rax
>> 1294: 55 push %rbp
>> 1295: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
>> 1298: 53 push %rbx
>> 1299: 31 db xor %ebx,%ebx
>> 129b: 83 e0 03 and $0x3,%eax
>> 129e: 48 83 f8 02 cmp $0x2,%rax
>> 12a2: 74 05 je 12a9 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a9>
>> 12a4: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
>> 12a6: 5b pop %rbx
>> 12a7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12a8: c3 retq
>> 12a9: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 12ae <__SetPageMovable+0x12ae>
>> 12ae: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12b1: 74 f1 je 12a4 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a4>
>> 12b3: 48 8b 40 68 mov 0x68(%rax),%rax
>> 12b7: 48 85 c0 test %rax,%rax
>> 12ba: 74 e8 je 12a4 <__SetPageMovable+0x12a4>
>> 12bc: 48 83 78 68 00 cmpq $0x0,0x68(%rax)
>> 12c1: 0f 95 c3 setne %bl
>> 12c4: 89 d8 mov %ebx,%eax
>> 12c6: 5b pop %rbx
>> 12c7: 5d pop %rbp
>> 12c8: c3 retq
>> 12c9: 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 nopl 0x0(%rax)
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Chen Gang (陈刚)
>>
>> Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
>
--
Chen Gang (陈刚)
Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-12 16:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-09 15:55 [PATCH] mm: migrate: Use bool instead of int for the return value of PageMovable chengang
2016-07-09 15:55 ` chengang
2016-07-11 0:26 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-11 0:26 ` Minchan Kim
2016-07-11 19:47 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-11 19:47 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-12 7:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-12 7:15 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-07-12 16:42 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-12 16:42 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-12 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 7:48 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-12 16:50 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2016-07-12 16:50 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-13 7:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-13 7:53 ` Michal Hocko
2016-07-17 0:51 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-17 0:51 ` Chen Gang
2016-07-13 14:26 ` 回复:[PATCH] " 陈刚
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57851FC4.4000000@emindsoft.com.cn \
--to=chengang@emindsoft.com.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
--cc=hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.