From: Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
srv_heupstream <srv_heupstream@mediatek.com>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:27:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578E54F3.3000908@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFo0438H8odWks6HeD6E64+oyXYMHESv=pxqQyJe_9oaWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/19/2016 12:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 15:38, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2016 03:50 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 16 July 2016 at 00:10, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Chaotian Jing
>>>> <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>>> Per JEDEC spec, it is not recommended to use CMD13 to get card status
>>>>> after speed mode switch. below are two reason about this:
>>>>> 1. CMD13 cannot be guaranteed due to the asynchronous operation.
>>>>> Therefore it is not recommended to use CMD13 to check busy completion
>>>>> of the timing change indication.
>>>>> 2. After switch to HS200, CMD13 will get response of 0x800, and even the
>>>>> busy signal gets de-asserted, the response of CMD13 is aslo 0x800.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>> [..]
>>>>> @@ -1274,20 +1254,18 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
>>>>> err = __mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>>>> EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, val,
>>>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time,
>>>>> - true, send_status, true);
>>>>> + true, false, true);
>>>>> if (err)
>>>>> goto err;
>>>>> old_timing = host->ios.timing;
>>>>> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200);
>>>>> - if (!send_status) {
>>>>> - err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>>> - * it is a switch error.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>>> - mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>>> + * it is a switch error.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>>> + mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but with the move of the call of
>>>> mmc_switch_status() to after mmc_set_timing() we get following error
>>>> with sdhci-msm:
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> mmc0: mmc_select_hs200 failed, error -110
>>>> mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
>>>> mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
>>>> sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
>>>> sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00002e02
>>>> sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Present: 0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
>>>> sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Caps: 0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x00008007
>>>> sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
>>>> sdhci: ===========================================
>>>>
>>>> But I if I understand the commit correctly this is the intention of
>>>> the patch (not the error, but the move).
>>>
>>> I tried dropping this change from my next branch, but there are some
>>> more changes on top that prevents a "clean" drop. It's certainly
>>> doable, but perhaps we can try to narrow down the problem to see if
>>> this could/should be fixed in the sdhci msm driver instead!?
>>
>> Yes, i am working on it. Seems that if we just ignore the -ETIMEDOUT
>> returned by mmc_switch_status() everything works as before. Currently
>> i am expecting more information about this controller specifics, in
>> order to understand if this could be fixed with a change in the driver
>> only.
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
Here is a partial fix, as it resolves the issue for the eMMC only.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9237679/
More investigation ongoing.
Thanks,
Georgi
>>
>>>
>>> I also noticed that below submitted change, which *isn't* applied for
>>> next, might be related.
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9197881/
>>>
>>
>> It is not related to this issue, but it is good to have when this is
>> resolved, otherwise we will see the dumpregs output (pr_err now),
>> when controller is initialized without a card in the SD slot.
>
> Okay, thanks for clarifying. Although, I need an ack from Adrian
> before I apply it.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Georgi
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: georgi.djakov@linaro.org (Georgi Djakov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 19:27:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <578E54F3.3000908@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFo0438H8odWks6HeD6E64+oyXYMHESv=pxqQyJe_9oaWA@mail.gmail.com>
On 07/19/2016 12:31 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 18 July 2016 at 15:38, Georgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 07/18/2016 03:50 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 16 July 2016 at 00:10, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 1:47 AM, Chaotian Jing
>>>> <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com> wrote:
>>>>> Per JEDEC spec, it is not recommended to use CMD13 to get card status
>>>>> after speed mode switch. below are two reason about this:
>>>>> 1. CMD13 cannot be guaranteed due to the asynchronous operation.
>>>>> Therefore it is not recommended to use CMD13 to check busy completion
>>>>> of the timing change indication.
>>>>> 2. After switch to HS200, CMD13 will get response of 0x800, and even the
>>>>> busy signal gets de-asserted, the response of CMD13 is aslo 0x800.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
>>>> [..]
>>>>> @@ -1274,20 +1254,18 @@ static int mmc_select_hs200(struct mmc_card *card)
>>>>> err = __mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
>>>>> EXT_CSD_HS_TIMING, val,
>>>>> card->ext_csd.generic_cmd6_time,
>>>>> - true, send_status, true);
>>>>> + true, false, true);
>>>>> if (err)
>>>>> goto err;
>>>>> old_timing = host->ios.timing;
>>>>> mmc_set_timing(host, MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200);
>>>>> - if (!send_status) {
>>>>> - err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>>> - /*
>>>>> - * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>>> - * it is a switch error.
>>>>> - */
>>>>> - if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>>> - mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>>> - }
>>>>> + err = mmc_switch_status(card);
>>>>> + /*
>>>>> + * mmc_select_timing() assumes timing has not changed if
>>>>> + * it is a switch error.
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + if (err == -EBADMSG)
>>>>> + mmc_set_timing(host, old_timing);
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for not spotting this earlier, but with the move of the call of
>>>> mmc_switch_status() to after mmc_set_timing() we get following error
>>>> with sdhci-msm:
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> mmc0: mmc_select_hs200 failed, error -110
>>>> mmc0: error -110 whilst initialising MMC card
>>>> mmc0: Reset 0x1 never completed.
>>>> sdhci: =========== REGISTER DUMP (mmc0)===========
>>>> sdhci: Sys addr: 0x00000000 | Version: 0x00002e02
>>>> sdhci: Blk size: 0x00004000 | Blk cnt: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Argument: 0x00000000 | Trn mode: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Present: 0x01f80000 | Host ctl: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Power: 0x00000000 | Blk gap: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Wake-up: 0x00000000 | Clock: 0x00000003
>>>> sdhci: Timeout: 0x00000000 | Int stat: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Int enab: 0x00000000 | Sig enab: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: AC12 err: 0x00000000 | Slot int: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Caps: 0x322dc8b2 | Caps_1: 0x00008007
>>>> sdhci: Cmd: 0x00000000 | Max curr: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: Host ctl2: 0x00000000
>>>> sdhci: ADMA Err: 0x00000000 | ADMA Ptr: 0x0000000000000000
>>>> sdhci: ===========================================
>>>>
>>>> But I if I understand the commit correctly this is the intention of
>>>> the patch (not the error, but the move).
>>>
>>> I tried dropping this change from my next branch, but there are some
>>> more changes on top that prevents a "clean" drop. It's certainly
>>> doable, but perhaps we can try to narrow down the problem to see if
>>> this could/should be fixed in the sdhci msm driver instead!?
>>
>> Yes, i am working on it. Seems that if we just ignore the -ETIMEDOUT
>> returned by mmc_switch_status() everything works as before. Currently
>> i am expecting more information about this controller specifics, in
>> order to understand if this could be fixed with a change in the driver
>> only.
>
> Thanks for looking into this!
>
Here is a partial fix, as it resolves the issue for the eMMC only.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9237679/
More investigation ongoing.
Thanks,
Georgi
>>
>>>
>>> I also noticed that below submitted change, which *isn't* applied for
>>> next, might be related.
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9197881/
>>>
>>
>> It is not related to this issue, but it is good to have when this is
>> resolved, otherwise we will see the dumpregs output (pr_err now),
>> when controller is initialized without a card in the SD slot.
>
> Okay, thanks for clarifying. Although, I need an ack from Adrian
> before I apply it.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Georgi
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-19 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-19 8:47 [PATCH v2] mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] mmc: mmc: use ops->card_busy() to check card status in __mmc_switch() Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-06-21 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-21 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
[not found] ` <1463647662-27426-1-git-send-email-chaotian.jing-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-19 8:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: mmc: do not use CMD13 to get status after speed mode switch Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
[not found] ` <1463647662-27426-3-git-send-email-chaotian.jing-NuS5LvNUpcJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-21 13:16 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-21 13:16 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-21 13:16 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-15 22:10 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-07-15 22:10 ` Bjorn Andersson
2016-07-18 12:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-18 12:50 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-18 13:38 ` Georgi Djakov
2016-07-18 13:38 ` Georgi Djakov
2016-07-19 9:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-19 9:31 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-07-19 16:27 ` Georgi Djakov [this message]
2016-07-19 16:27 ` Georgi Djakov
2016-05-19 8:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc: mmc: fix switch timeout issue caused by jiffies precision Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-05-19 8:47 ` Chaotian Jing
2016-06-21 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
2016-06-21 13:15 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=578E54F3.3000908@linaro.org \
--to=georgi.djakov@linaro.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=chaotian.jing@mediatek.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.