Re: [Qemu-trivial] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] util/qemu-sockets: revert Yoda Conditions to normal

[Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>]

On 07/28/2016 11:32 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 07/28/2016 04:50 AM, Cao jin wrote:
>> Follow CODING_STYLE
>>
>> Cc: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>>   util/qemu-sockets.c | 10 +++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> Daniel P. Berrange make me realized there is Yoda Conditions in this file,
>> this file is mixed with both style, since I just touched this file, so,
>> reverting it is handy to me.
>>
>> diff --git a/util/qemu-sockets.c b/util/qemu-sockets.c
>> index 5e08723..a07acc5 100644
>> --- a/util/qemu-sockets.c
>> +++ b/util/qemu-sockets.c
>> @@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ static int inet_dgram_saddr(InetSocketAddress *sraddr,
>>           goto err;
>>       }
>>
>> -    if (0 != (rc = getaddrinfo(addr, port, &ai, &peer))) {
>> +    if ((rc = getaddrinfo(addr, port, &ai, &peer)) != 0) {
>
> CODING_STYLE is currently silent on whether assignment in conditionals
> is appropriate, so maybe that should be patched.  But most of our code
> prefers:
>
> rc = getaddrinfo();
> if (rc != 0) {
>

I prefer this style too, save seconds to think what's the value of 
assignment expression. Thanks for pointing it out:) v2 is coming.

> rather than assignments in the conditional.  I don't have any strong
> opinions on whether that would require a respin or whether your patch is
> fine as is.
>

-- 
Yours Sincerely,

Cao jin