From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
minchan@kernel.org, zijun_hu@htc.com, rientjes@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix align value calculation error
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:27:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A3F98D.1060500@zoho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804142421.576426492d629f0839298f9a@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/05/2016 05:24 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> it causes double align requirement for __get_vm_area_node() if parameter
>> size is power of 2 and VM_IOREMAP is set in parameter flags
>>
>> it is fixed by handling the specail case manually due to lack of
>> get_count_order() for long parameter
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -1357,11 +1357,16 @@ static struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size,
>> {
>> struct vmap_area *va;
>> struct vm_struct *area;
>> + int ioremap_size_order;
>>
>> BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
>> - if (flags & VM_IOREMAP)
>> - align = 1ul << clamp_t(int, fls_long(size),
>> - PAGE_SHIFT, IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER);
>> + if (flags & VM_IOREMAP) {
>> + ioremap_size_order = fls_long(size);
>> + if (is_power_of_2(size) && size != 1)
>> + ioremap_size_order--;
>> + align = 1ul << clamp_t(int, ioremap_size_order, PAGE_SHIFT,
>> + IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER);
>> + }
>>
>> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>> if (unlikely(!size))
>
> I'm having trouble with this, and a more complete description would
> have helped!
>
> As far as I can tell, the current code will decide the following:
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x8000
>
no, the current code doesn't achieve the above results as shown below
size=0x10000 -> fls_long(0x10000)=17 -> alignment=0x20000
size=0x0f000 -> fls_long(0x0f000)=16 -> alignment=0x10000
it is wrong for power of 2 value such as size=0x10000
> And your patch will change it so that
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x8000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x8000
>
> Correct?
>
no, my patch will results in the following calculations
size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
size=0x0f000: alignment=0x10000
> If so, I'm struggling to see the sense in this. Shouldn't we be
> changing things so that
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x10000
>
> ?
okay, it is the aim of my patch as explained above
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zijun_hu <zijun_hu@zoho.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org,
minchan@kernel.org, zijun_hu@htc.com, rientjes@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix align value calculation error
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2016 10:27:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57A3F98D.1060500@zoho.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160804142421.576426492d629f0839298f9a@linux-foundation.org>
On 08/05/2016 05:24 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>
>> it causes double align requirement for __get_vm_area_node() if parameter
>> size is power of 2 and VM_IOREMAP is set in parameter flags
>>
>> it is fixed by handling the specail case manually due to lack of
>> get_count_order() for long parameter
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -1357,11 +1357,16 @@ static struct vm_struct *__get_vm_area_node(unsigned long size,
>> {
>> struct vmap_area *va;
>> struct vm_struct *area;
>> + int ioremap_size_order;
>>
>> BUG_ON(in_interrupt());
>> - if (flags & VM_IOREMAP)
>> - align = 1ul << clamp_t(int, fls_long(size),
>> - PAGE_SHIFT, IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER);
>> + if (flags & VM_IOREMAP) {
>> + ioremap_size_order = fls_long(size);
>> + if (is_power_of_2(size) && size != 1)
>> + ioremap_size_order--;
>> + align = 1ul << clamp_t(int, ioremap_size_order, PAGE_SHIFT,
>> + IOREMAP_MAX_ORDER);
>> + }
>>
>> size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
>> if (unlikely(!size))
>
> I'm having trouble with this, and a more complete description would
> have helped!
>
> As far as I can tell, the current code will decide the following:
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x8000
>
no, the current code doesn't achieve the above results as shown below
size=0x10000 -> fls_long(0x10000)=17 -> alignment=0x20000
size=0x0f000 -> fls_long(0x0f000)=16 -> alignment=0x10000
it is wrong for power of 2 value such as size=0x10000
> And your patch will change it so that
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x8000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x8000
>
> Correct?
>
no, my patch will results in the following calculations
size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
size=0x0f000: alignment=0x10000
> If so, I'm struggling to see the sense in this. Shouldn't we be
> changing things so that
>
> size=0x10000: alignment=0x10000
> size=0x0f000: alignment=0x10000
>
> ?
okay, it is the aim of my patch as explained above
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-05 2:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-04 8:02 [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: fix align value calculation error zijun_hu
2016-08-04 8:02 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-04 8:36 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-04 8:36 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-04 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-04 21:24 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-05 2:27 ` zijun_hu [this message]
2016-08-05 2:27 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-05 15:48 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-05 15:48 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-09 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-09 21:28 ` Andrew Morton
2016-08-10 5:32 ` zijun_hu
2016-08-10 5:32 ` zijun_hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57A3F98D.1060500@zoho.com \
--to=zijun_hu@zoho.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=zijun_hu@htc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.