* Merging rados related backports
@ 2016-08-05 13:08 Loic Dachary
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-05 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Samuel Just; +Cc: Ceph Development
Hi Sam,
When running the rados suite on a given backport targetting jewel (or hammer for that matter, but it's less of an issue) I figured the smallest subset would be enough to guarantee there is no trivial regression, this is why we're routinely using X/2000. I understand this is not enough coverage to release jewel and we have the nightlies running X/14 for that. When jewel is eventually released, all of the rados suite should have been run.
If you think there are too many regressions merged in the jewel branch because X/2000 did not detect them, we will increase the size of the subset. This will slow down backporting when the lab is misbehaving, but that's less time consuming than chassing a regression long after the guilty commit has been merged.
Cheers
[1] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph-releases/wiki/Sepia/97
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2016-08-05 13:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-05 13:08 Merging rados related backports Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.