From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
Cc: Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
rruigrok@codeaurora.org, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
wei@redhat.com, Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
harba@codeaurora.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>,
Hanj
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon>
Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64
> directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on
> the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning
> out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created
> in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of
> Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull
> request.
>
> If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes,
> you can proceed as above.
What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is
everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved.
Who will be merging these patches?
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Linaro ACPI Mailman List <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
rruigrok@codeaurora.org, harba@codeaurora.org,
Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>,
G Gregory <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
Al Stone <al.stone@linaro.org>, Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>,
wei@redhat.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@iguana.be>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Leo Duran <leo.duran@amd.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon>
Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64
> directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on
> the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning
> out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created
> in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of
> Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull
> request.
>
> If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes,
> you can proceed as above.
What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is
everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved.
Who will be merging these patches?
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: timur@codeaurora.org (Timur Tabi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 14:01:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160811105848.GA25680@red-moon>
Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> I do not think you need a v11 just to remove the drivers/acpi/arm64
> directory creation, you need to get Daniel/Thomas review/ack on
> the respective patches though, I do not see the point of churning
> out another series just because drivers/acpi/arm64 is now created
> in the IORT patch series. If v10 is ok you will rebase it on top of
> Tomasz's series and mention the dependency in the respective pull
> request.
>
> If there is need for a v11 following Daniel/Thomas review yes,
> you can proceed as above.
What's the latest on this patchset? I really want them in 4.9. Is
everything queued up, or are still issues that need to be resolved.
Who will be merging these patches?
--
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 12:19 [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
[not found] ` <1469535565-20924-1-git-send-email-fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 1/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Move enums and defines to header file fu.wei-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 2/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Add a new enum for spi type fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 3/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Improve printk relevant code fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 4/8] acpi/arm64: Add GTDT table parse driver fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 5/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Simplify ACPI support code fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 6/8] acpi/arm64: Add memory-mapped timer support in GTDT driver fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 7/8] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Add GTDT support for memory-mapped timer fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v10 8/8] acpi/arm64: Add SBSA Generic Watchdog support in GTDT driver fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2016-07-26 12:19 ` fu.wei
2016-08-11 9:37 ` [PATCH v10 0/8] acpi, clocksource: add GTDT driver and GTDT support in arm_arch_timer Tomasz Nowicki
2016-08-11 9:37 ` Tomasz Nowicki
[not found] ` <0befd611-91a7-88e9-1686-82929c1745e8-nYOzD4b6Jr9Wk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2016-08-11 10:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-08-11 10:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-08-11 10:15 ` Hanjun Guo
2016-08-11 10:22 ` Fu Wei
2016-08-11 10:22 ` Fu Wei
2016-08-11 10:22 ` Fu Wei
2016-08-11 10:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-08-11 10:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-08-11 10:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-08-17 19:01 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2016-08-17 19:01 ` Timur Tabi
2016-08-17 19:01 ` Timur Tabi
2016-08-18 7:48 ` Fu Wei
2016-08-18 7:48 ` Fu Wei
2016-08-18 7:48 ` Fu Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57B4B47E.5030100@codeaurora.org \
--to=timur@codeaurora.org \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=harba@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rruigrok@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=wei@redhat.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.