All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: thunder.leizhen@huawei.com (Leizhen (ThunderTown))
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

Hi everybody:
   Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.

Thanks,
   Zhen Lei


On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch independent.
> 
> This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7 and 8,
> other patches have no change.
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> This version has no code changes, just add "Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>"
> into patches 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14. Because these patches rely on some acpi numa
> patches, and the latter had not been upstreamed in 4.7, but upstreamed in 4.8-rc1,
> so I resend my patches again.
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8.
> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the
>    patches looks more well. The final code have no change. 
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679
> 2. Rewrote of_numa_parse_memory_nodes according to Rob Herring's advice. So that it looks more clear.
> 3. Rewrote patch 5 because some scenes were not considered before.
> 
> Kefeng Wang (3):
>   of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code
>   of_numa: Use pr_fmt()
>   arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()
> 
> Zhen Lei (11):
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information
>   of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block
>   arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated warning
>   arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>   arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
>   arm64/numa: remove some useless code
>   of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
>   Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                         |  12 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h              |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                    |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c                       | 223 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/of/of_numa.c                       |  88 ++++++------
>  6 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-kernel
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Frank Rowand
	<frowand.list-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Xinwei Hu <huxinwei-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Tianhong Ding
	<dingtianhong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

Hi everybody:
   Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.

Thanks,
   Zhen Lei


On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch independent.
> 
> This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7 and 8,
> other patches have no change.
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> This version has no code changes, just add "Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>"
> into patches 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14. Because these patches rely on some acpi numa
> patches, and the latter had not been upstreamed in 4.7, but upstreamed in 4.8-rc1,
> so I resend my patches again.
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8.
> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the
>    patches looks more well. The final code have no change. 
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679
> 2. Rewrote of_numa_parse_memory_nodes according to Rob Herring's advice. So that it looks more clear.
> 3. Rewrote patch 5 because some scenes were not considered before.
> 
> Kefeng Wang (3):
>   of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code
>   of_numa: Use pr_fmt()
>   arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()
> 
> Zhen Lei (11):
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information
>   of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block
>   arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated warning
>   arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>   arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
>   arm64/numa: remove some useless code
>   of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
>   Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                         |  12 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h              |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                    |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c                       | 223 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/of/of_numa.c                       |  88 ++++++------
>  6 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>, Xinwei Hu <huxinwei@huawei.com>,
	"Tianhong Ding" <dingtianhong@huawei.com>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:47:39 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1470908028-8596-1-git-send-email-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>

Hi everybody:
   Is this patch series can be accepted or still need to be improved? It seems
to have been a long time.

Thanks,
   Zhen Lei


On 2016/8/11 17:33, Zhen Lei wrote:
> v5 -> v6:
> Move memblk nid check from arch/arm64/mm/numa.c into drivers/of/of_numa.c,
> because this check is arch independent.
> 
> This modification only related to patch 3, but impacted the contents of patch 7 and 8,
> other patches have no change.
> 
> v4 -> v5:
> This version has no code changes, just add "Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>"
> into patches 1, 2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 14. Because these patches rely on some acpi numa
> patches, and the latter had not been upstreamed in 4.7, but upstreamed in 4.8-rc1,
> so I resend my patches again.
> 
> v3 -> v4:
> 1. Packed three patches of Kefeng Wang, patch6-8.
> 2. Add 6 new patches(9-15) to enhance the numa on arm64.
> 
> v2 -> v3:
> 1. Adjust patch2 and patch5 according to Matthias Brugger's advice, to make the
>    patches looks more well. The final code have no change. 
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 1. Base on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/24/679
> 2. Rewrote of_numa_parse_memory_nodes according to Rob Herring's advice. So that it looks more clear.
> 3. Rewrote patch 5 because some scenes were not considered before.
> 
> Kefeng Wang (3):
>   of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code
>   of_numa: Use pr_fmt()
>   arm64: numa: Use pr_fmt()
> 
> Zhen Lei (11):
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information
>   of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block
>   arm64/numa: add nid check for memory block
>   of/numa: remove a duplicated warning
>   arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA
>   arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code
>   arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
>   arm64/numa: remove some useless code
>   of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
>   Documentation: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/numa.txt |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                         |  12 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h              |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c                    |   1 +
>  arch/arm64/mm/numa.c                       | 223 ++++++++++++++++-------------
>  drivers/of/of_numa.c                       |  88 ++++++------
>  6 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.5.0
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-22  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-11  9:33 [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] of/numa: remove a duplicated pr_debug information Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] of/numa: fix a memory@ node can only contains one memory block Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] arm64/numa: add nid check for " Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] of/numa: remove a duplicated warning Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] arm64/numa: avoid inconsistent information to be printed Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] of_numa: Use of_get_next_parent to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] of_numa: Use pr_fmt() Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] arm64: numa: " Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] arm64/numa: support HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] arm64/numa: define numa_distance as array to simplify code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] arm64/numa: support HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] arm64/numa: remove some useless code Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] of/numa: remove the constraint on the distances of node pairs Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] Documentation: " Zhen Lei
2016-08-11  9:33   ` Zhen Lei
2016-08-22  7:47 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown) [this message]
2016-08-22  7:47   ` [PATCH v6 00/14] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa Leizhen (ThunderTown)
2016-08-22  7:47   ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57BAAE1B.2070808@huawei.com \
    --to=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.