Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3

[Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>]

On 24/08/2016 19:40, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> Just need the following two PRs merged and then ACK for QE:
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827
> 

Done. Not sure why I missed them, good catch.

> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>> +1 -- results look as expected.
>>
>> Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ?
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>>> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/
>>>>
>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>>>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it
>>>>> builds.  If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick
>>>>> it off.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>>>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote:
>>>>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following
>>>>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge,
>>>>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open
>>>>>>>>> PRs:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre