* rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 @ 2016-08-23 8:46 Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:06 ` Jason Dillaman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 8:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Hi Jason, The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 8:46 rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:06 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-23 13:12 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-23 13:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, I would also like to include the following which already have open PRs: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Jason, > > The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. > > Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:06 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-23 13:12 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) Cheers On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: > If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following > included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 > > ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, > I would also like to include the following which already have open > PRs: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 > > I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> Hi Jason, >> >> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >> >> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:12 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Loic Dachary 1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-23 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney The PR is available now [1]. I can build a test branch, run the tests, and email you with a +1 if that works better timezone-wise. [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) > > Cheers > > On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >> >> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >> I would also like to include the following which already have open >> PRs: >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >> >> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>> >>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >> >> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:12 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:34 ` Loic Dachary 1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: > Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) > > Cheers > > On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >> >> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >> I would also like to include the following which already have open >> PRs: >> >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >> >> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> Hi Jason, >>> >>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>> >>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >> >> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:34 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:35 ` Jason Dillaman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: > The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. > > On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >> >> Cheers >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>> >>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>> PRs: >>> >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>> >>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>> Hi Jason, >>>> >>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>> >>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:34 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-23 13:35 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 7:07 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-23 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick it off. Thanks On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 > > On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>> >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>> >>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>> PRs: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>> >>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>> >>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>> >>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-23 13:35 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-24 7:07 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-24 15:30 ` Jason Dillaman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-24 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: > OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it > builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick > it off. > > Thanks > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>> >>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>> >>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>> >>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>> PRs: >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>> >>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>> >>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-24 7:07 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-24 15:30 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 15:49 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-24 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney +1 -- results look as expected. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ > > On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >> it off. >> >> Thanks >> >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>>> >>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>> >>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>> PRs: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>> >>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-24 15:30 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-24 15:49 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-24 17:40 ` Jason Dillaman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-24 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: > +1 -- results look as expected. Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >> >> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>> it off. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>> >>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-24 15:49 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-24 17:40 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 20:09 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread From: Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-24 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Just need the following two PRs merged and then ACK for QE: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > > > On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: >> +1 -- results look as expected. > > Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? > >> >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >>> >>> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>>> it off. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>>> >>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> >> >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre -- Jason ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 2016-08-24 17:40 ` Jason Dillaman @ 2016-08-24 20:09 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-08-24 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dillaman; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney On 24/08/2016 19:40, Jason Dillaman wrote: > Just need the following two PRs merged and then ACK for QE: > > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 > Done. Not sure why I missed them, good catch. > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:49 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> >> >> On 24/08/2016 17:30, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>> +1 -- results look as expected. >> >> Cool :-) Backports were merged, is there anything else you need ? Or can it be passed to QE ? >> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>> It is running at http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-24_06:41:40-rbd-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/ >>>> >>>> On 23/08/2016 15:35, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>> OK -- in that case, feel free to kick off an rbd test run after it >>>>> builds. If it ends up being after-hours, let me know and I can kick >>>>> it off. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>> The jewel-backport branch also has all the pull request you mentionned below. The details of what it contains are at http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-32 >>>>>> >>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:32, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>> The jewel-backport branch is in gitbuilder with the http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 backport https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10827 . I'll wait to hear from you before scheduling a run however. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:12, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>>>>> Ok. Let me know when the backport of http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 is ready and I'll schedule tests. If you'd rather do the test yourself, that's also fine with me :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 23/08/2016 15:06, Jason Dillaman wrote: >>>>>>>>> If at all possible, I would definitely like to see the following >>>>>>>>> included in 10.2.3 since users are hitting it in the field: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16950 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ... and given that would require another RBD test run prior to merge, >>>>>>>>> I would also like to include the following which already have open >>>>>>>>> PRs: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10791 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10790 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10792 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10646 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10647 >>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10786 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can create a PR for the high priority issue this morning. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi Jason, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel received (I think :-) enough rbd backports to cut the release. It was more challenging than usual and I'd like to thank you and Mykola for helping with the tricky parts. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > > > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-24 20:09 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-08-23 8:46 rbd and the next jewel release v10.2.3 Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:06 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-23 13:12 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-23 13:32 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:34 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-23 13:35 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 7:07 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-24 15:30 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 15:49 ` Loic Dachary 2016-08-24 17:40 ` Jason Dillaman 2016-08-24 20:09 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.