* Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates
@ 2016-09-19 4:26 Sridhar Kondabathini
2016-09-19 16:28 ` Ben Greear
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Sridhar Kondabathini @ 2016-09-19 4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Horse, ath10k, michal.kazior, Raj Joshi
Hi,
When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on T1024RDB ( we used
kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support), then we
are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC specification (which is
~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes.
Can you please help on this.
Regards,
Sridhar Kondabathini,
Research engineer,
PSG lab,
Center for Development Of Telematics
9480484821.
Disclaimer:
----------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely
for
the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking
any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The
sender does not a
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-19 4:26 Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates Sridhar Kondabathini @ 2016-09-19 16:28 ` Ben Greear 2016-09-19 17:22 ` Adrian Chadd 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-09-19 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sridhar Kondabathini, Horse, ath10k, michal.kazior, Raj Joshi Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar setup? Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the traffic? Thanks, Ben On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: > Hi, > > When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on T1024RDB ( we used > kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC support), then we > are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC specification (which is > ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. > > Can you please help on this. > > > > Regards, > > Sridhar Kondabathini, > Research engineer, > PSG lab, > Center for Development Of Telematics > 9480484821. > > > > > Disclaimer: > ---------- > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely > for > the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking > any > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The > sender does not a > > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-19 16:28 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-09-19 17:22 ` Adrian Chadd 2016-09-20 3:46 ` Sridhar Konabathini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Adrian Chadd @ 2016-09-19 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear Cc: Raj Joshi, Michal Kazior, Horse, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Sridhar Kondabathini ... and what's "TEC specification" ? - a On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar > setup? > > Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the > traffic? > > Thanks, > Ben > > > On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on >> T1024RDB ( we used >> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC >> support), then we >> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC >> specification (which is >> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. >> >> Can you please help on this. >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Sridhar Kondabathini, >> Research engineer, >> PSG lab, >> Center for Development Of Telematics >> 9480484821. >> >> >> >> >> Disclaimer: >> ---------- >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >> solely >> for >> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you >> are not the >> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing >> or taking >> any >> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly >> prohibited. The >> sender does not a >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath10k mailing list >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >> > > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-19 17:22 ` Adrian Chadd @ 2016-09-20 3:46 ` Sridhar Konabathini 2016-09-20 4:33 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Sridhar Konabathini @ 2016-09-20 3:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Adrian Chadd, Ben Greear Cc: Horse, Raj Joshi, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Michal Kazior Hi, I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup. we are using WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this will generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes). As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below. Mode Asso. rate Throughput 802.11a 54 Mbps 28 Mbps 802.11g 54 Mbps 28 Mbps But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ? [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body, prepares specification of common Telecom standards.] Regards, Sridhar On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote > .... and what's "TEC specification" ? > > - > a > > On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > > Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar > > setup? > > > > Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the > > traffic? > > > > Thanks, > > Ben > > > > > > On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on > >> T1024RDB ( we used > >> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC > >> support), then we > >> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC > >> specification (which is > >> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. > >> > >> Can you please help on this. > >> > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Sridhar Kondabathini, > >> Research engineer, > >> PSG lab, > >> Center for Development Of Telematics > >> 9480484821. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Disclaimer: > >> ---------- > >> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > >> solely > >> for > >> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you > >> are not the > >> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > >> or taking > >> any > >> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > >> prohibited. The > >> sender does not a > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ath10k mailing list > >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org > >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > >> > > > > > > -- > > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > ath10k mailing list > > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k Regards, Sridhar Kondabathini, Research engineer, PSG lab, Center for Development Of Telematics 9480484821. Disclaimer: ---------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The sender does not a _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-20 3:46 ` Sridhar Konabathini @ 2016-09-20 4:33 ` Ben Greear 2016-09-20 8:04 ` Sridhar Konabathini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-09-20 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sridhar Konabathini, Adrian Chadd Cc: Horse, Raj Joshi, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Michal Kazior LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code. What is the device under test? And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc? There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be less than expected. And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com Thanks, Ben On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote: > Hi, > I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup. > > we are using WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this will > generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes). > > As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below. > > Mode Asso. rate Throughput > > 802.11a 54 Mbps 28 Mbps > > 802.11g 54 Mbps 28 Mbps > > But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ? > > [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body, > prepares specification of common Telecom standards.] > > Regards, > Sridhar > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote >> .... and what's "TEC specification" ? >> >> - >> a >> >> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: >>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar >>> setup? >>> >>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the >>> traffic? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on >>>> T1024RDB ( we used >>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC >>>> support), then we >>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC >>>> specification (which is >>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. >>>> >>>> Can you please help on this. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Sridhar Kondabathini, >>>> Research engineer, >>>> PSG lab, >>>> Center for Development Of Telematics >>>> 9480484821. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Disclaimer: >>>> ---------- >>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >>>> solely >>>> for >>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you >>>> are not the >>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing >>>> or taking >>>> any >>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly >>>> prohibited. The >>>> sender does not a >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ath10k mailing list >>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ath10k mailing list >>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath10k mailing list >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > > > Regards, > > Sridhar Kondabathini, > Research engineer, > PSG lab, > Center for Development Of Telematics > 9480484821. > > > > > Disclaimer: > ---------- > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely > for > the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking > any > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The > sender does not a > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-20 4:33 ` Ben Greear @ 2016-09-20 8:04 ` Sridhar Konabathini 2016-09-20 13:05 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Sridhar Konabathini @ 2016-09-20 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ben Greear, Adrian Chadd Cc: Michal Kazior, Horse, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Raj Joshi Hi, Yes, we are doing the testing in an isolation chamber (no attenuators used), antennas are connected to RF card via SMA cable. Tx power is 5dBm. we are not suspecting Lanforge as it gives required throughput in different WiFi setup. here Device Under test is T2014 based card. Regards, Sridhar On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:33:03 -0700, Ben Greear wrote > LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely > it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code. > > What is the device under test? > > And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc? > > There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide > lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be > less than expected. > > And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com > > Thanks, > Ben > > On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote: > > Hi, > > I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup. > > > > we are using WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this will > > generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes). > > > > As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below. > > > > Mode Asso. rate Throughput > > > > 802.11a 54 Mbps 28 Mbps > > > > 802.11g 54 Mbps 28 Mbps > > > > But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ? > > > > [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body, > > prepares specification of common Telecom standards.] > > > > Regards, > > Sridhar > > > > > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote > >> .... and what's "TEC specification" ? > >> > >> - > >> a > >> > >> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: > >>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar > >>> setup? > >>> > >>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the > >>> traffic? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Ben > >>> > >>> > >>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on > >>>> T1024RDB ( we used > >>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC > >>>> support), then we > >>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC > >>>> specification (which is > >>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. > >>>> > >>>> Can you please help on this. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> > >>>> Sridhar Kondabathini, > >>>> Research engineer, > >>>> PSG lab, > >>>> Center for Development Of Telematics > >>>> 9480484821. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Disclaimer: > >>>> ---------- > >>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended > >>>> solely > >>>> for > >>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you > >>>> are not the > >>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing > >>>> or taking > >>>> any > >>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly > >>>> prohibited. The > >>>> sender does not a > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> ath10k mailing list > >>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org > >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > >>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> ath10k mailing list > >>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org > >>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ath10k mailing list > >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org > >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Sridhar Kondabathini, > > Research engineer, > > PSG lab, > > Center for Development Of Telematics > > 9480484821. > > > > > > > > > > Disclaimer: > > ---------- > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely > > for > > the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the > > intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking > > any > > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The > > sender does not a > > > > -- > Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com > > _______________________________________________ > ath10k mailing list > ath10k@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k Regards, Sridhar Kondabathini, Research engineer, PSG lab, Center for Development Of Telematics 9480484821. Disclaimer: ---------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The sender does not a _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates 2016-09-20 8:04 ` Sridhar Konabathini @ 2016-09-20 13:05 ` Ben Greear 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Ben Greear @ 2016-09-20 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sridhar Konabathini, Adrian Chadd Cc: Michal Kazior, Horse, ath10k@lists.infradead.org, Raj Joshi You normally need to add 30-60 db of attenuation to get best throughput when directly cabling with SMA cables. Please try adding more attenuation. What firmware are you using on the T1024RDB? Maybe also try using a different firmware version to see if that helps. Thanks, Ben On 09/20/2016 01:04 AM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote: > Hi, > Yes, we are doing the testing in an isolation chamber (no attenuators used), antennas > are connected to RF card via SMA cable. Tx power is 5dBm. we are not suspecting Lanforge > as it gives required throughput in different WiFi setup. > here Device Under test is T2014 based card. > > Regards, > Sridhar > > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 21:33:03 -0700, Ben Greear wrote >> LANforge is going to be running a modified driver and firmware, though likely >> it is no worse at performance in this case than stock code. >> >> What is the device under test? >> >> And, are you in an isolation chamber, using SMA cables, attenuation, etc? >> >> There are lots of things that can impact wifi throughput so you have to provide >> lots more details in order for anyone to understand why the throughput might be >> less than expected. >> >> And if it is specific to LANforge, please send email to support@candelatech.com >> >> Thanks, >> Ben >> >> On 09/19/2016 08:46 PM, Sridhar Konabathini wrote: >>> Hi, >>> I didnt try with ath9k drivers on the same setup. >>> >>> we are using WiFi capacity test tool on Lanforge to test the performance, this > will >>> generate the traffic. we are selecting the UDP protocol (packet - 1472 Bytes). >>> >>> As per TEC spec. required data rates are given below. >>> >>> Mode Asso. rate Throughput >>> >>> 802.11a 54 Mbps 28 Mbps >>> >>> 802.11g 54 Mbps 28 Mbps >>> >>> But we are getting only 26-27Mbps, how to improve this throughput ? >>> >>> [TEC(Telecommunication Engineering Centre, Govt. India) is a technical body, >>> prepares specification of common Telecom standards.] >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sridhar >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 10:22:26 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote >>>> .... and what's "TEC specification" ? >>>> >>>> - >>>> a >>>> >>>> On 19 September 2016 at 09:28, Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> wrote: >>>>> Out of curiosity, does ath9k perform at the required rates in a similar >>>>> setup? >>>>> >>>>> Sending tcp, udp, or some other protocol? How are you generating the >>>>> traffic? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 09/18/2016 09:26 PM, Sridhar Kondabathini wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> When we are testing 802.11 a/g mode throughput measurements on >>>>>> T1024RDB ( we used >>>>>> kernel-3.12; ath10k drivers backported from 4.4;hostapd 2.5 for 11AC >>>>>> support), then we >>>>>> are getting 26-27 Mbps , which is not meeting the required TEC >>>>>> specification (which is >>>>>> ~28 Mbps). How can we increase the throughput in these modes. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can you please help on this. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> Sridhar Kondabathini, >>>>>> Research engineer, >>>>>> PSG lab, >>>>>> Center for Development Of Telematics >>>>>> 9480484821. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Disclaimer: >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended >>>>>> solely >>>>>> for >>>>>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you >>>>>> are not the >>>>>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing >>>>>> or taking >>>>>> any >>>>>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly >>>>>> prohibited. The >>>>>> sender does not a >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >>>>> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ath10k mailing list >>>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> ath10k mailing list >>>> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Sridhar Kondabathini, >>> Research engineer, >>> PSG lab, >>> Center for Development Of Telematics >>> 9480484821. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Disclaimer: >>> ---------- >>> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely >>> for >>> the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the >>> intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking >>> any >>> action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The >>> sender does not a >>> >> >> -- >> Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> >> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ath10k mailing list >> ath10k@lists.infradead.org >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k > > > Regards, > > Sridhar Kondabathini, > Research engineer, > PSG lab, > Center for Development Of Telematics > 9480484821. > > > > > Disclaimer: > ---------- > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely > for > the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the > intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking > any > action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. The > sender does not a > -- Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-20 13:11 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-09-19 4:26 Issue with ATH10K driver with 802.11 a/g mode datarates Sridhar Kondabathini 2016-09-19 16:28 ` Ben Greear 2016-09-19 17:22 ` Adrian Chadd 2016-09-20 3:46 ` Sridhar Konabathini 2016-09-20 4:33 ` Ben Greear 2016-09-20 8:04 ` Sridhar Konabathini 2016-09-20 13:05 ` Ben Greear
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.