Upcoming 10.2.4

Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Abhishek,

Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)

Cheers

[1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318 
-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[John Spray]

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)

I've just done a test run of the following jewel PRs:
[11389]  mon: don't crash on invalid standby_for_fscid
[10997]  jewel: multimds: allow_multimds not required when max_mds is
set in ceph.conf at startup
[10958]  jewel: client: fix shutdown with open inodes
[10921]  jewel client: add missing client_lock for get_root
[10107]  jewel: client: FAILED assert(root_ancestor->qtree == __null)

http://pulpito.ceph.com/jspray-2016-10-10_15:27:25-fs-wip-jcsp-backports-20161010-distro-basic-mira/

No (real) failures -- can we go ahead and merge all these before 10.2.4?

Cheers,
John

> Cheers
>
> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Dan van der Ster]

On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:15 PM, John Spray <jspray@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>
> I've just done a test run of the following jewel PRs:
> [11389]  mon: don't crash on invalid standby_for_fscid
> [10997]  jewel: multimds: allow_multimds not required when max_mds is
> set in ceph.conf at startup
> [10958]  jewel: client: fix shutdown with open inodes
> [10921]  jewel client: add missing client_lock for get_root
> [10107]  jewel: client: FAILED assert(root_ancestor->qtree == __null)
>
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/jspray-2016-10-10_15:27:25-fs-wip-jcsp-backports-20161010-distro-basic-mira/
>
> No (real) failures -- can we go ahead and merge all these before 10.2.4?
>
> Cheers,
> John

John/Loic, did "client: kill QuotaTree" fall off the backport radar?

  https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9591/commits/161954bbfeb13d5588668637d5258221948128ea
  http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16066

Tracker's offline now, but AFAICT this wasn't yet backported to jewel.
And this is unfortunate because jewel's ceph-fuse is still crashy with
client quota enabled.

Thanks!

Dan

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

On 11/10/2016 12:33, Dan van der Ster wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 12:15 PM, John Spray <jspray@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Abhishek,
>>>
>>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>>
>> I've just done a test run of the following jewel PRs:
>> [11389]  mon: don't crash on invalid standby_for_fscid
>> [10997]  jewel: multimds: allow_multimds not required when max_mds is
>> set in ceph.conf at startup
>> [10958]  jewel: client: fix shutdown with open inodes
>> [10921]  jewel client: add missing client_lock for get_root
>> [10107]  jewel: client: FAILED assert(root_ancestor->qtree == __null)
>>
>> http://pulpito.ceph.com/jspray-2016-10-10_15:27:25-fs-wip-jcsp-backports-20161010-distro-basic-mira/
>>
>> No (real) failures -- can we go ahead and merge all these before 10.2.4?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John
> 
> John/Loic, did "client: kill QuotaTree" fall off the backport radar?
> 
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/9591/commits/161954bbfeb13d5588668637d5258221948128ea
>   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16066
> 
> Tracker's offline now, but AFAICT this wasn't yet backported to jewel.
> And this is unfortunate because jewel's ceph-fuse is still crashy with
> client quota enabled.

I'll make sure it lands in 10.2.4.

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

Hi John,

On 11/10/2016 12:15, John Spray wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 11:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
> 
> I've just done a test run of the following jewel PRs:
> [11389]  mon: don't crash on invalid standby_for_fscid
> [10997]  jewel: multimds: allow_multimds not required when max_mds is
> set in ceph.conf at startup
> [10958]  jewel: client: fix shutdown with open inodes
> [10921]  jewel client: add missing client_lock for get_root
> [10107]  jewel: client: FAILED assert(root_ancestor->qtree == __null)
> 
> http://pulpito.ceph.com/jspray-2016-10-10_15:27:25-fs-wip-jcsp-backports-20161010-distro-basic-mira/
> 
> No (real) failures -- can we go ahead and merge all these before 10.2.4?

Done ! Thanks for testing them. The tracker is 502 and a number of VPS run fail because of environmental failures. 10.2.4 may not happen next week after all ;-)

Cheers

> 
> Cheers,
> John
> 
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Ken Dreyer]

Sorry this is last minute... it would be really great to get
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11431 into v10.2.4. The PR adds some
files to Jewel's tarballs to make them closer to what is in a jewel
Git checkout.

- Ken

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

On 11/10/2016 18:59, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> Sorry this is last minute... it would be really great to get
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11431 into v10.2.4. The PR adds some
> files to Jewel's tarballs to make them closer to what is in a jewel
> Git checkout.

Ok. I'll make sure it's in 10.2.4.

Cheers

> 
> - Ken
> 
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Orit Wasserman]

Hi,
I have a fix for the old radosgw-admin corruption (upgrade issue) that
will be good to be included in 10.2.4
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11426.
it still need to pass teuthology and than we can merge it.

Orit

On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Orit,

Please ping me as soon as it is merged and I'll do the needful.

Cheers

On 11/10/2016 20:38, Orit Wasserman wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a fix for the old radosgw-admin corruption (upgrade issue) that
> will be good to be included in 10.2.4
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11426.
> it still need to pass teuthology and than we can merge it.
> 
> Orit
> 
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Abhishek,

Unless I missed something, all backports that matter are now in the last round of testing[1]. If we're lucky all backports in the testing branch (jewel-backports) will be merged. Even if it's not the case I'll make sure at least all the urgent ones[2] are.

If the test infrastructure permits, I should be able to propose you to cut 10.2.4 early next week.

Cheers

[1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16
[2] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96

On 10/10/2016 12:59, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
> 
> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
> 
> Cheers
> 
> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Jason Dillaman]

There is one more backport required [1] once it is merged into the
master branch (hopefully this week) to fix an assertion failure that
would otherwise be introduced by 10.2.4.

Thanks,
Jason

[1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11520

On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Unless I missed something, all backports that matter are now in the last round of testing[1]. If we're lucky all backports in the testing branch (jewel-backports) will be merged. Even if it's not the case I'll make sure at least all the urgent ones[2] are.
>
> If the test infrastructure permits, I should be able to propose you to cut 10.2.4 early next week.
>
> Cheers
>
> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16
> [2] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> On 10/10/2016 12:59, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
>>
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



-- 
Jason

Re: Upcoming 10.2.4

[Loic Dachary]

Ok. I created http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17616 and set it to Urgent so that it's not overlooked.

On 19/10/2016 16:26, Jason Dillaman wrote:
> There is one more backport required [1] once it is merged into the
> master branch (hopefully this week) to fix an assertion failure that
> would otherwise be introduced by 10.2.4.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason
> 
> [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11520
> 
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 5:52 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Abhishek,
>>
>> Unless I missed something, all backports that matter are now in the last round of testing[1]. If we're lucky all backports in the testing branch (jewel-backports) will be merged. Even if it's not the case I'll make sure at least all the urgent ones[2] are.
>>
>> If the test infrastructure permits, I should be able to propose you to cut 10.2.4 early next week.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-16
>> [2] http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> On 10/10/2016 12:59, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>> Hi Abhishek,
>>>
>>> Since you're now release manager, it is my understanding that we'll be asking you if the release should be cut or not. I updated the issue tracking the progress of 10.2.4 accordingly. This is a heads up to let you know we'll most likely ask that question for 10.2.4 some time next week ;-)
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/journals/diff/79457?detail_id=76318
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre