From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
t.figa@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:46:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5806444.UHVgoFeOY3@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404210076-2362-2-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com>
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG
>
> config PLAT_S5P
> bool
> - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> default y
> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> select ARM_VIC
> @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC
> used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX.
>
> config S5P_CLOCK
> - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> help
> Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs
>
> # options for IRQ support
>
> config S5P_IRQ
> - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> help
> Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs
>
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK
>
> config S5P_DEV_UART
> def_bool y
> - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
>
> # ADC driver
>
I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely
after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the
code back to mach-s5pv210, right?
> config SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction"
> - depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> + depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> select DMADEVICES
> default y
> help
It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it
any more, but that's also a separate patch.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 13:46:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5806444.UHVgoFeOY3@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1404210076-2362-2-git-send-email-kgene.kim@samsung.com>
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 19:21:16 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-samsung/Kconfig
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ config PLAT_SAMSUNG
>
> config PLAT_S5P
> bool
> - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
> default y
> select ARCH_REQUIRE_GPIOLIB
> select ARM_VIC
> @@ -78,14 +78,14 @@ config SAMSUNG_CLKSRC
> used by newer systems such as the S3C64XX.
>
> config S5P_CLOCK
> - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> help
> Support common clock part for ARCH_S5P and ARCH_EXYNOS SoCs
>
> # options for IRQ support
>
> config S5P_IRQ
> - def_bool (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + def_bool ARCH_S5PV210
> help
> Support common interrupt part for ARCH_S5P SoCs
>
> @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ config S3C_GPIO_TRACK
>
> config S5P_DEV_UART
> def_bool y
> - depends on (ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210)
> + depends on ARCH_S5PV210
>
> # ADC driver
>
I guess the next logical step would be to either remove these entirely
after the move to DT-only ARCH_S5PV210 obsoletes them, or to move the
code back to mach-s5pv210, right?
> config SAMSUNG_DMADEV
> bool "Use legacy Samsung DMA abstraction"
> - depends on CPU_S5PV210 || CPU_S5PC100 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> + depends on CPU_S5PV210 || ARCH_S3C64XX
> select DMADEVICES
> default y
> help
It would be good to just kill this one off now, as nothing uses it
any more, but that's also a separate patch.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-01 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-01 10:21 [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 10:21 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 10:21 ` [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 10:21 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 11:46 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-07-01 11:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 12:18 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 12:18 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 12:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 12:55 ` Jason Cooper
2014-07-01 12:55 ` Jason Cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5806444.UHVgoFeOY3@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.