* rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 @ 2016-10-27 9:26 Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson 0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yehuda Sadeh; +Cc: Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Hi Yehuda, The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Cheers -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman 2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Orit Wasserman @ 2016-10-27 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Hi Loic, We still need : https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run) Nice to have: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372 http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571 Thanks, Orit On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Yehuda, > > The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? > > Cheers > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman @ 2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Orit Wasserman; +Cc: Ceph Development On 27/10/2016 20:33, Orit Wasserman wrote: > Hi Loic, > We still need : > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472 Merged. > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run) Will run it first thing tomorrow morning. > > Nice to have: > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372 > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571 Thanks for the quick feedback ! Cheers > > Thanks, > Orit > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> >> Cheers >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-28 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Orit Wasserman; +Cc: Ceph Development On 27/10/2016 21:44, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 27/10/2016 20:33, Orit Wasserman wrote: >> Hi Loic, >> We still need : >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11472 > > Merged. > >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669 (needs teuthology run) > > Will run it first thing tomorrow morning. The tests were successfull (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11669#issuecomment-256782689) and the pull request was merged. >> >> Nice to have: >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17372 >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17571 > > Thanks for the quick feedback ! > > Cheers > >> >> Thanks, >> Orit >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre >>> -- >>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >> > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman @ 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson 2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary 1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Robin H. Johnson @ 2016-10-27 21:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 769 bytes --] On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: > Hi Yehuda, > > The next jewel release as found at > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite > (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel > branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Trustee & Treasurer E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 [-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1083 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson @ 2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Robin H. Johnson; +Cc: Yehuda Sadeh, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney Hi Robin, Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary. Cheers On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >> Hi Yehuda, >> >> The next jewel release as found at >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite >> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel >> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? > Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 > > This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. > (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary @ 2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub 2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub @ 2016-10-27 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Loic Dachary Cc: Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney, Orit Wasserman We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is supposed to look into that. Yehuda On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: > Hi Robin, > > Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary. > > Cheers > > On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> Hi Yehuda, >>> >>> The next jewel release as found at >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite >>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel >>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in >> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 >> >> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. >> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) >> > > -- > Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub @ 2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman 2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread From: Orit Wasserman @ 2016-11-01 9:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Cc: Loic Dachary, Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 is merged in master. Loic, is it still possible to backport it to 10.2.4? Thanks, Orit On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub <yehuda@redhat.com> wrote: > We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been > accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see > it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is > supposed to look into that. > > Yehuda > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >> Hi Robin, >> >> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary. >> >> Cheers >> >> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>> Hi Yehuda, >>>> >>>> The next jewel release as found at >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite >>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel >>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in >>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 >>> >>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. >>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) >>> >> >> -- >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman @ 2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary 0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread From: Loic Dachary @ 2016-11-01 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Orit Wasserman, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub Cc: Robin H. Johnson, Ceph Development, Abhishek Varshney On 01/11/2016 10:17, Orit Wasserman wrote: > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 is merged in master. > Loic, is it still possible to backport it to 10.2.4? Yes. > > Thanks, > Orit > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:05 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub > <yehuda@redhat.com> wrote: >> We need to have it in master first. Sadly this one has been >> accidentally closed so we missed some time on it. I'll be happy to see >> it in 10.2.4, but we need to have it merged to master first. Orit is >> supposed to look into that. >> >> Yehuda >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote: >>> Hi Robin, >>> >>> Since it's not yet merged in master I'm deferring to Yehuda's decision. I'd be happy to delay 10.2.4 if necessary. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> On 27/10/2016 23:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 11:26:43AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote: >>>>> Hi Yehuda, >>>>> >>>>> The next jewel release as found at >>>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite >>>>> (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17487#note-18). Do you think the jewel >>>>> branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ? >>>> Can you please bring in the StaticSites fix in >>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/11280 >>>> >>>> This issue has been dragging since late August now :-(. >>>> (it got reverted last time because it exposed a test suite bug) >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre > -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-11-01 14:54 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-10-27 9:26 rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.4 Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 18:33 ` Orit Wasserman 2016-10-27 19:44 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-28 12:39 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 21:10 ` Robin H. Johnson 2016-10-27 21:55 ` Loic Dachary 2016-10-27 22:05 ` Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub 2016-11-01 9:17 ` Orit Wasserman 2016-11-01 14:54 ` Loic Dachary
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.