Re: [PATCH v7 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen

[Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>]

Hi Ming,

On 2017/1/13 18:23, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> wrote:
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
>> msi support.
>>
>> For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform, we have IORT
>> table with the named componant node to describe the mappings of paltform
>> device and ITS, so we can retrieve the dev id and find its parent
>> irqdomain (ITS) from IORT table (simlar with the ACPI ITS support).
>>
>> v6 -> v7:
>>         - Introduce iort_node_map_platform_id() to retrieve the
>>           dev id for both NC (named component) -> ITS/SMMU and
>>           NC -> SMMU -> ITS cases, suggested by Lorenzo;
>>
>>         - Reorder the patches and rewrite some commit message;
>>
>>         - Remove the test tags because it has major changes
>>           to retrieve the dev id, Sinan, Majun, Xinwei, could
>>           you please test them again on your platform?
>>
>>         - rebased on top of 4.10-rc3 and Lorenzo's patch
>>           https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9507041/
>>
>>         - Tested against Agustin's patch [1-2/3] "[PATCH V9 0/3] irqchip: qcom:
>>           Add IRQ combiner driver"
> Looks v7 works fine on D05, together with Lorenzo's
> fix([v2] ACPI/IORT: Fix iort_node_get_id() mapping entries indexing) and
> Agustin's patchset of "v9 irqchip: qcom: Add IRQ combiner driver".
>
> Tested-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>

Thank you very much :)

Hanjun