From: Guoqing Jiang <gqjiang@suse.com>
To: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: "open list:SOFTWARE RAID (Multiple Disks) SUPPORT"
<linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
songliubraving@fb.com, pawel.baldysiak@intel.com,
mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com, artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com,
Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:33:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <587C3EF1.3020401@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79796ea4-2631-c762-b8a1-50bcdcbc602e@suse.de>
On 01/10/2017 12:38 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose a general md raid discussion, it is quite necessary
> for most of active md raid developers sit together to discuss current
> challenge of Linux software raid and development trends.
>
> In the last years, we have many development activities in md raid, e.g.
> raid5 cache, raid1 clustering, partial parity log, fast fail
> upstreaming, and some effort for raid1 & raid0 performance improvement.
>
> I see there are some kind of functionality overlap between r5cache
> (raid5 cache) and PPL (partial parity log), currently I have no idea
> where we will go for these two development activities.
> Also I receive reports from users that raid1 performance is desired when
> it is built on NVMe SSDs as a cache (maybe bcache or dm-cache). I am
> working on some raid1 performance improvement (e.g. new raid1 I/O
> barrier and lockless raid1 I/O submit), and have some more ideas to discuss.
>
> Therefore, if md raid developers may have a chance to sit together,
> discuss how to efficiently collaborate in next year, it will be much
> more productive then communicating on mailing list.
I would like to attend raid discussion, besides above topics I think we
can talk about improve the test suite of mdadm to make it more robust
(I can share related test suite which is used for clustered raid).
And I could share the status of clustered raid about what we have done
and what we can do in the future. Finally, I'd like to know/discuss about
the roadmap of RAID.
Thanks a lot!
Guoqing
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gqjiang@suse.com (Guoqing Jiang)
Subject: [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 11:33:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <587C3EF1.3020401@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79796ea4-2631-c762-b8a1-50bcdcbc602e@suse.de>
On 01/10/2017 12:38 AM, Coly Li wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> I'd like to propose a general md raid discussion, it is quite necessary
> for most of active md raid developers sit together to discuss current
> challenge of Linux software raid and development trends.
>
> In the last years, we have many development activities in md raid, e.g.
> raid5 cache, raid1 clustering, partial parity log, fast fail
> upstreaming, and some effort for raid1 & raid0 performance improvement.
>
> I see there are some kind of functionality overlap between r5cache
> (raid5 cache) and PPL (partial parity log), currently I have no idea
> where we will go for these two development activities.
> Also I receive reports from users that raid1 performance is desired when
> it is built on NVMe SSDs as a cache (maybe bcache or dm-cache). I am
> working on some raid1 performance improvement (e.g. new raid1 I/O
> barrier and lockless raid1 I/O submit), and have some more ideas to discuss.
>
> Therefore, if md raid developers may have a chance to sit together,
> discuss how to efficiently collaborate in next year, it will be much
> more productive then communicating on mailing list.
I would like to attend raid discussion, besides above topics I think we
can talk about improve the test suite of mdadm to make it more robust
(I can share related test suite which is used for clustered raid).
And I could share the status of clustered raid about what we have done
and what we can do in the future. Finally, I'd like to know/discuss about
the roadmap of RAID.
Thanks a lot!
Guoqing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-16 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-09 16:38 [LSF/MM TOPIC] [LSF/MM ATTEND] md raid general discussion Coly Li
2017-01-09 16:38 ` Coly Li
2017-01-12 15:09 ` [Lsf-pc] " Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 15:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 15:09 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-13 4:00 ` Coly Li
2017-01-13 4:00 ` Coly Li
2017-01-16 3:33 ` Guoqing Jiang [this message]
2017-01-16 3:33 ` Guoqing Jiang
2017-01-16 5:40 ` [Lsf-pc] " James Bottomley
2017-01-16 5:40 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=587C3EF1.3020401@suse.com \
--to=gqjiang@suse.com \
--cc=Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mariusz.dabrowski@intel.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=pawel.baldysiak@intel.com \
--cc=shli@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.