From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Keep quiet in case of broadcasted mce after system panic
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:53:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A65791.4090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216122215.uvrckt25g2msfxhe@pd.tnic>
On 02/16/2017 at 08:22 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:52:09PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> then mce will be broadcast to the other cpus which are still running
>> in the first kernel(i.e. looping in crash_nmi_callback).
> Simple: the crash code should really mark CPUs as not being online:
>
> void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>
> ...
>
> /* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
> if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
> u64 mcgstatus;
>
> mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
> if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
> mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
> return;
> }
> }
>
> because looping in crash_nmi_callback() does not really denote them as
> CPUs being online.
>
> And just so that you don't disturb the machine too much during crashing,
> you could simply clear them from the online masks, i.e., perhaps call
> remove_cpu_from_maps() with the proper locking around it instead of
> doing a full cpu_down().
It changes the value of cpu_online_mask/etc which will cause confusion to vmcore analysis.
Moreover, for the code(see comment inlined)
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
u64 mcgstatus;
mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) { // This condition may be not true, the mce triggered on kdump cpu
// doesn't need to have this bit set for the other cpus remain in 1st kernel.
mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
return;
}
}
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> The machine will be killed anyway after kdump is done writing out
> memory.
>
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, xlpang@redhat.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>,
Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Keep quiet in case of broadcasted mce after system panic
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:53:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58A65791.4090600@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170216122215.uvrckt25g2msfxhe@pd.tnic>
On 02/16/2017 at 08:22 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:52:09PM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> then mce will be broadcast to the other cpus which are still running
>> in the first kernel(i.e. looping in crash_nmi_callback).
> Simple: the crash code should really mark CPUs as not being online:
>
> void do_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs, long error_code)
>
> ...
>
> /* If this CPU is offline, just bail out. */
> if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
> u64 mcgstatus;
>
> mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
> if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) {
> mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
> return;
> }
> }
>
> because looping in crash_nmi_callback() does not really denote them as
> CPUs being online.
>
> And just so that you don't disturb the machine too much during crashing,
> you could simply clear them from the online masks, i.e., perhaps call
> remove_cpu_from_maps() with the proper locking around it instead of
> doing a full cpu_down().
It changes the value of cpu_online_mask/etc which will cause confusion to vmcore analysis.
Moreover, for the code(see comment inlined)
if (cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id())) {
u64 mcgstatus;
mcgstatus = mce_rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS);
if (mcgstatus & MCG_STATUS_RIPV) { // This condition may be not true, the mce triggered on kdump cpu
// doesn't need to have this bit set for the other cpus remain in 1st kernel.
mce_wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCG_STATUS, 0);
return;
}
}
Regards,
Xunlei
>
> The machine will be killed anyway after kdump is done writing out
> memory.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-17 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-23 8:01 [PATCH] x86/mce: Keep quiet in case of broadcasted mce after system panic Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 8:01 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 12:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 12:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 13:35 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 13:35 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-23 14:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 14:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 17:40 ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 17:40 ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 17:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 18:01 ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 18:01 ` Luck, Tony
2017-01-23 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-23 18:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-24 2:33 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 2:33 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:46 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:46 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:51 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:51 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:27 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 1:27 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-24 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-24 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-26 6:30 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-26 6:30 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-01-26 6:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-01-26 6:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16 5:36 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 5:36 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 10:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16 10:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16 11:52 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 11:52 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-16 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-16 12:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-17 1:53 ` Xunlei Pang [this message]
2017-02-17 1:53 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-17 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-17 9:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2017-02-17 16:21 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-17 16:21 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-21 18:20 ` Luck, Tony
2017-02-21 18:20 ` Luck, Tony
2017-02-22 5:50 ` Xunlei Pang
2017-02-22 5:50 ` Xunlei Pang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58A65791.4090600@redhat.com \
--to=xpang@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
--cc=k-ueda@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.