From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>,
lindar_liu@usish.com,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
pmchba@pmcs.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: build in relevant functions and code on PM8001_USE_MSIX
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 08:34:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D3889B.7030400@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322185004.1012-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 22.03.2017 19:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the misx and intx variables of the interrupt enable/disable
> helper functions are built in no matter what the setting of the
> macro PM8001_USE_MSIX. Clean this up by just building in the
> necessary helper functions and calls to these functions depending on
> the setting of PM8001_USE_MSIX. This addresses several dead code
> paths found by static analysis with CoverityScan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> index 10546faac58c..d1be10fd1350 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> @@ -1204,26 +1204,7 @@ void pm8001_chip_iounmap(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> }
> }
>
> -/**
> - * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> -}
> -
> - /**
> - * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> -}
> +#ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
>
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> @@ -1257,6 +1238,30 @@ pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, msi_index, MSIX_INTERRUPT_DISABLE);
> }
>
> +#else
> +
> +/**
> + * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> +}
> +
> + /**
> + * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> @@ -1266,10 +1271,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1281,10 +1285,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -4613,15 +4616,15 @@ static int pm8001_chip_phy_ctl_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>
> static u32 pm8001_chip_is_our_interupt(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> {
> - u32 value;
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> return 1;
> -#endif
> - value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +#else
> + u32 value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +
> if (value)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
This is a bit strange, why do this function return u32 ?
re,
wh
> /**
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com>,
lindar_liu@usish.com,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
pmchba@pmcs.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: build in relevant functions and code on PM8001_USE_MSIX
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 09:34:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58D3889B.7030400@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170322185004.1012-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 22.03.2017 19:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Currently the misx and intx variables of the interrupt enable/disable
> helper functions are built in no matter what the setting of the
> macro PM8001_USE_MSIX. Clean this up by just building in the
> necessary helper functions and calls to these functions depending on
> the setting of PM8001_USE_MSIX. This addresses several dead code
> paths found by static analysis with CoverityScan.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> index 10546faac58c..d1be10fd1350 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_hwi.c
> @@ -1204,26 +1204,7 @@ void pm8001_chip_iounmap(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> }
> }
>
> -/**
> - * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> -}
> -
> - /**
> - * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> - * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> - */
> -static void
> -pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> -{
> - pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> -}
> +#ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
>
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> @@ -1257,6 +1238,30 @@ pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
> pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, msi_index, MSIX_INTERRUPT_DISABLE);
> }
>
> +#else
> +
> +/**
> + * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_CLEAR_ALL);
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODCR, ODCR_CLEAR_ALL);
> +}
> +
> + /**
> + * pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable- disable PM8001 chip interrupt
> + * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> + */
> +static void
> +pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> +{
> + pm8001_cw32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODMR, ODMR_MASK_ALL);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> * pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable - enable PM8001 chip interrupt
> * @pm8001_ha: our hba card information
> @@ -1266,10 +1271,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_enable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_enable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -1281,10 +1285,9 @@ pm8001_chip_interrupt_disable(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u8 vec)
> {
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> pm8001_chip_msix_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha, 0);
> - return;
> -#endif
> +#else
> pm8001_chip_intx_interrupt_disable(pm8001_ha);
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -4613,15 +4616,15 @@ static int pm8001_chip_phy_ctl_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>
> static u32 pm8001_chip_is_our_interupt(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
> {
> - u32 value;
> #ifdef PM8001_USE_MSIX
> return 1;
> -#endif
> - value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +#else
> + u32 value = pm8001_cr32(pm8001_ha, 0, MSGU_ODR);
> +
> if (value)
> return 1;
> return 0;
> -
> +#endif
> }
>
This is a bit strange, why do this function return u32 ?
re,
wh
> /**
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-23 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 18:50 [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: build in relevant functions and code on PM8001_USE_MSIX Colin King
2017-03-23 8:34 ` walter harms [this message]
2017-03-23 8:34 ` walter harms
2017-03-23 9:17 ` Jinpu Wang
2017-03-23 9:17 ` Jinpu Wang
2017-03-23 9:16 ` Jinpu Wang
2017-03-23 9:16 ` Jinpu Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=58D3889B.7030400@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@profitbricks.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lindar_liu@usish.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=pmchba@pmcs.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.