All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: anurupvasu@gmail.com (Anurup M)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 07/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:18:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58DCD47C.2010501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321165252.GA29116@leverpostej>



On Tuesday 21 March 2017 10:22 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> +static int hisi_hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> >+{
> >+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> >+	struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> >+	struct device *dev = hisi_pmu->dev;
>> +
>> >+	/*
>> >+	 * We must NOT create groups containing mixed PMUs, although
>> >+	 * software events are acceptable
>> >+	 */
>> >+	if (event->group_leader->pmu != event->pmu &&
>> >+	    !is_software_event(event->group_leader))
>> >+		return -EINVAL;
>> >+
>> >+	list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list,
>> >+			    group_entry)
>> >+		if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu && !is_software_event(sibling))
>> >+			return -EINVAL;
> Please also check the number of counters.

Sorry, I could not follow this comment correctly. Could you please explain ?
I check the available counters and update used mask in pmu_add --> 
get_event_index

Thanks,
Anurup

> [...]
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anurup M <anurupvasu@gmail.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, anurup.m@huawei.com,
	zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com, tanxiaojun@huawei.com,
	xuwei5@hisilicon.com, sanil.kumar@hisilicon.com,
	john.garry@huawei.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com,
	shiju.jose@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, dikshit.n@huawei.com, shyju.pv@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:18:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <58DCD47C.2010501@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170321165252.GA29116@leverpostej>



On Tuesday 21 March 2017 10:22 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> +static int hisi_hw_perf_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
> >+{
> >+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
> >+	struct hisi_pmu *hisi_pmu = to_hisi_pmu(event->pmu);
> >+	struct device *dev = hisi_pmu->dev;
>> +
>> >+	/*
>> >+	 * We must NOT create groups containing mixed PMUs, although
>> >+	 * software events are acceptable
>> >+	 */
>> >+	if (event->group_leader->pmu != event->pmu &&
>> >+	    !is_software_event(event->group_leader))
>> >+		return -EINVAL;
>> >+
>> >+	list_for_each_entry(sibling, &event->group_leader->sibling_list,
>> >+			    group_entry)
>> >+		if (sibling->pmu != event->pmu && !is_software_event(sibling))
>> >+			return -EINVAL;
> Please also check the number of counters.

Sorry, I could not follow this comment correctly. Could you please explain ?
I check the available counters and update used mask in pmu_add --> 
get_event_index

Thanks,
Anurup

> [...]
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-10  6:28 [PATCH v6 07/11] drivers: perf: hisi: Add support for Hisilicon SoC event counters Anurup M
2017-03-10  6:28 ` Anurup M
2017-03-21 16:52 ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-21 16:52   ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-24 10:18   ` Anurup M
2017-03-24 10:18     ` Anurup M
2017-03-24 11:57     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-24 11:57       ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-27  6:34       ` Anurup M
2017-03-27  6:34         ` Anurup M
2017-03-30  9:48   ` Anurup M [this message]
2017-03-30  9:48     ` Anurup M
2017-03-30 10:46     ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-30 10:46       ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-31 14:13       ` Anurup M
2017-03-31 14:13         ` Anurup M
2017-03-31 14:23         ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-31 14:23           ` Mark Rutland
2017-03-31 15:04           ` Anurup M
2017-03-31 15:04             ` Anurup M

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=58DCD47C.2010501@gmail.com \
    --to=anurupvasu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.