* [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it
@ 2017-04-25 3:14 Roger.He
[not found] ` <1493090078-29023-1-git-send-email-Hongbo.He-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Roger.He @ 2017-04-25 3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Cc: david1.zhou-5C7GfCeVMHo, Roger.He
Change-Id: Id925f4e241c4192127880d2017fbf2979aa09fc7
Signed-off-by: Roger.He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index f74149c..cebd546 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -2468,6 +2468,27 @@ bool amdgpu_need_backup(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
return amdgpu_lockup_timeout > 0 ? true : false;
}
+static int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
+{
+ uint32_t domain;
+ int r;
+
+ if (bo->pin_count)
+ return 0;
+
+ domain = bo->prefered_domains;
+
+retry:
+ amdgpu_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, domain);
+ r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
+ if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain != bo->allowed_domains) {
+ domain = bo->allowed_domains;
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
+ return r;
+}
+
static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
@@ -2485,6 +2506,18 @@ static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
/* if bo has been evicted, then no need to recover */
if (domain == AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
+ r = amdgpu_bo_validate(bo->shadow);
+ if (r) {
+ DRM_ERROR("bo validate failed!\n");
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&bo->shadow->tbo, &bo->shadow->tbo.mem);
+ if (r) {
+ DRM_ERROR("%p bind failed\n", bo->shadow);
+ goto err;
+ }
+
r = amdgpu_bo_restore_from_shadow(adev, ring, bo,
NULL, fence, true);
if (r) {
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it
[not found] ` <1493090078-29023-1-git-send-email-Hongbo.He-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-04-25 3:16 ` zhoucm1
[not found] ` <58FEBFA9.7050700-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: zhoucm1 @ 2017-04-25 3:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Roger.He, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
On 2017年04月25日 11:14, Roger.He wrote:
> Change-Id: Id925f4e241c4192127880d2017fbf2979aa09fc7
> Signed-off-by: Roger.He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index f74149c..cebd546 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -2468,6 +2468,27 @@ bool amdgpu_need_backup(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> return amdgpu_lockup_timeout > 0 ? true : false;
> }
>
> +static int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
> +{
> + uint32_t domain;
> + int r;
> +
> + if (bo->pin_count)
> + return 0;
> +
> + domain = bo->prefered_domains;
> +
> +retry:
> + amdgpu_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, domain);
> + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
> + if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain != bo->allowed_domains) {
> + domain = bo->allowed_domains;
> + goto retry;
> + }
> +
> + return r;
> +}
you can move this function to amdgpu_object.c, with that fix, it looks
ok to me, Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
> +
> static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
> struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
> @@ -2485,6 +2506,18 @@ static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
> /* if bo has been evicted, then no need to recover */
> if (domain == AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
> + r = amdgpu_bo_validate(bo->shadow);
> + if (r) {
> + DRM_ERROR("bo validate failed!\n");
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&bo->shadow->tbo, &bo->shadow->tbo.mem);
> + if (r) {
> + DRM_ERROR("%p bind failed\n", bo->shadow);
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> r = amdgpu_bo_restore_from_shadow(adev, ring, bo,
> NULL, fence, true);
> if (r) {
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it
[not found] ` <58FEBFA9.7050700-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-04-25 8:09 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <21598379-3859-bf61-50b9-467cbd40ab74-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christian König @ 2017-04-25 8:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: zhoucm1, Roger.He, amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW
Am 25.04.2017 um 05:16 schrieb zhoucm1:
>
>
> On 2017年04月25日 11:14, Roger.He wrote:
>> Change-Id: Id925f4e241c4192127880d2017fbf2979aa09fc7
>> Signed-off-by: Roger.He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 33
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> index f74149c..cebd546 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> @@ -2468,6 +2468,27 @@ bool amdgpu_need_backup(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev)
>> return amdgpu_lockup_timeout > 0 ? true : false;
>> }
>> +static int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t domain;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + if (bo->pin_count)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + domain = bo->prefered_domains;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> + amdgpu_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, domain);
>> + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
>> + if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain != bo->allowed_domains) {
>> + domain = bo->allowed_domains;
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return r;
>> +}
> you can move this function to amdgpu_object.c, with that fix, it looks
> ok to me, Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Yeah, agree. Might even be a good idea to use this helper in amdgpu_cs.c
as well. IIRC we had something very similar in there as well.
But that should be a separate patch, with the function moved to
amdgpu_object.c this patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@amd.com> as well.
Regards,
Christian.
>
>> +
>> static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>> struct amdgpu_bo *bo,
>> @@ -2485,6 +2506,18 @@ static int
>> amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
>> /* if bo has been evicted, then no need to recover */
>> if (domain == AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_validate(bo->shadow);
>> + if (r) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("bo validate failed!\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&bo->shadow->tbo, &bo->shadow->tbo.mem);
>> + if (r) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("%p bind failed\n", bo->shadow);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> r = amdgpu_bo_restore_from_shadow(adev, ring, bo,
>> NULL, fence, true);
>> if (r) {
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it
[not found] ` <21598379-3859-bf61-50b9-467cbd40ab74-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
@ 2017-04-25 8:49 ` He, Hongbo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: He, Hongbo @ 2017-04-25 8:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian König, Zhou, David(ChunMing),
amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian König [mailto:deathsimple@vodafone.de]
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2017 4:10 PM
To: Zhou, David(ChunMing); He, Hongbo; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it
Am 25.04.2017 um 05:16 schrieb zhoucm1:
>
>
> On 2017年04月25日 11:14, Roger.He wrote:
>> Change-Id: Id925f4e241c4192127880d2017fbf2979aa09fc7
>> Signed-off-by: Roger.He <Hongbo.He@amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 33
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> index f74149c..cebd546 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>> @@ -2468,6 +2468,27 @@ bool amdgpu_need_backup(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev)
>> return amdgpu_lockup_timeout > 0 ? true : false;
>> }
>> +static int amdgpu_bo_validate(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t domain;
>> + int r;
>> +
>> + if (bo->pin_count)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + domain = bo->prefered_domains;
>> +
>> +retry:
>> + amdgpu_ttm_placement_from_domain(bo, domain);
>> + r = ttm_bo_validate(&bo->tbo, &bo->placement, false, false);
>> + if (unlikely(r == -ENOMEM) && domain != bo->allowed_domains) {
>> + domain = bo->allowed_domains;
>> + goto retry;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return r;
>> +}
> you can move this function to amdgpu_object.c, with that fix, it looks
> ok to me, Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com>
Yeah, agree. Might even be a good idea to use this helper in amdgpu_cs.c as well. IIRC we had something very similar in there as well.
Yes, I have noticed they have some similar logic code. Later if have time, I will try to do that. Thanks for your suggestion!
Thanks
Roger(Hongbo.He)
But that should be a separate patch, with the function moved to amdgpu_object.c this patch is Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> as well.
Regards,
Christian.
>
>> +
>> static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>> struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>> struct amdgpu_bo *bo, @@ -2485,6 +2506,18 @@
>> static int amdgpu_recover_vram_from_shadow(struct amdgpu_device
>> *adev,
>> domain = amdgpu_mem_type_to_domain(bo->tbo.mem.mem_type);
>> /* if bo has been evicted, then no need to recover */
>> if (domain == AMDGPU_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
>> + r = amdgpu_bo_validate(bo->shadow);
>> + if (r) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("bo validate failed!\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r = amdgpu_ttm_bind(&bo->shadow->tbo, &bo->shadow->tbo.mem);
>> + if (r) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("%p bind failed\n", bo->shadow);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> +
>> r = amdgpu_bo_restore_from_shadow(adev, ring, bo,
>> NULL, fence, true);
>> if (r) {
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-25 8:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-04-25 3:14 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: validate shadow before restoring from it Roger.He
[not found] ` <1493090078-29023-1-git-send-email-Hongbo.He-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-25 3:16 ` zhoucm1
[not found] ` <58FEBFA9.7050700-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-25 8:09 ` Christian König
[not found] ` <21598379-3859-bf61-50b9-467cbd40ab74-ANTagKRnAhcb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-25 8:49 ` He, Hongbo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.