From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: remove redundant null check on head
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 14:21:15 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5909E75B.30305@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170503135040.32023-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 03.05.2017 15:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> head is previously null checked and so the 2nd null check on head
> is redundant and therefore can be removed.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1399505 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_matchall.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> index 2efb36c08f2a..dee469fed967 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> @@ -203,8 +203,7 @@ static int mall_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>
> *arg = (unsigned long) head;
> rcu_assign_pointer(tp->root, new);
> - if (head)
> - call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> + call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> return 0;
>
> err_replace_hw_filter:
if someone cares .. the err=0 in the the line above the patch is also useless
because err is never used again. Merging both if will save 1 indent level.
err = mall_replace_hw_filter(tp, new, (unsigned long) new);
if (err && tc_skip_sw(flags) )
goto errout;
just my impression,
re
wh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/sched: remove redundant null check on head
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 16:21:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5909E75B.30305@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170503135040.32023-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 03.05.2017 15:50, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> head is previously null checked and so the 2nd null check on head
> is redundant and therefore can be removed.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1399505 ("Logically dead code")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> net/sched/cls_matchall.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> index 2efb36c08f2a..dee469fed967 100644
> --- a/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> +++ b/net/sched/cls_matchall.c
> @@ -203,8 +203,7 @@ static int mall_change(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *in_skb,
>
> *arg = (unsigned long) head;
> rcu_assign_pointer(tp->root, new);
> - if (head)
> - call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> + call_rcu(&head->rcu, mall_destroy_rcu);
> return 0;
>
> err_replace_hw_filter:
if someone cares .. the err=0 in the the line above the patch is also useless
because err is never used again. Merging both if will save 1 indent level.
err = mall_replace_hw_filter(tp, new, (unsigned long) new);
if (err && tc_skip_sw(flags) )
goto errout;
just my impression,
re
wh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 13:50 [PATCH] net/sched: remove redundant null check on head Colin King
2017-05-03 13:50 ` Colin King
2017-05-03 14:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-05-03 14:15 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-05-03 14:21 ` walter harms [this message]
2017-05-03 14:21 ` walter harms
2017-05-03 15:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-05-03 15:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2017-05-03 17:20 ` walter harms
2017-05-04 15:01 ` David Miller
2017-05-04 15:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5909E75B.30305@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.