From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Wei-Ning Huang <wnhuang@google.com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Google VPD: fix error handling on allocation failures
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 15:58:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5909FE21.7050607@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170503154924.1659-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 03.05.2017 17:49, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Fix two allocation failure checks. Firstly, ensure info is checked
> for a failed allocation; this fixes a potential null pointer
> dereference issue on info->key. Secondly, free info is info->key
> fails to allocate to fix a memory leak.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1430064 ("Resource Leak")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> index 3ce813110d5e..2eb15b1dabcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> @@ -116,9 +116,13 @@ static int vpd_section_attrib_add(const u8 *key, s32 key_len,
> return VPD_OK;
>
> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> info->key = kzalloc(key_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!info->key)
> + if (!info->key) {
> + kfree(info);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> memcpy(info->key, key, key_len);
>
the use of key_len+1 looks like preparing space for a string.
so kstrdup() seems more fitting. If this is not a string
there is also a kmemdup().
re,
wh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Wei-Ning Huang <wnhuang@google.com>,
Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@collabora.com>,
Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: Google VPD: fix error handling on allocation failures
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 17:58:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5909FE21.7050607@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170503154924.1659-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Am 03.05.2017 17:49, schrieb Colin King:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
>
> Fix two allocation failure checks. Firstly, ensure info is checked
> for a failed allocation; this fixes a potential null pointer
> dereference issue on info->key. Secondly, free info is info->key
> fails to allocate to fix a memory leak.
>
> Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1430064 ("Resource Leak")
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> index 3ce813110d5e..2eb15b1dabcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/google/vpd.c
> @@ -116,9 +116,13 @@ static int vpd_section_attrib_add(const u8 *key, s32 key_len,
> return VPD_OK;
>
> info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!info)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> info->key = kzalloc(key_len + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!info->key)
> + if (!info->key) {
> + kfree(info);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> memcpy(info->key, key, key_len);
>
the use of key_len+1 looks like preparing space for a string.
so kstrdup() seems more fitting. If this is not a string
there is also a kmemdup().
re,
wh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-03 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 15:49 [PATCH] firmware: Google VPD: fix error handling on allocation failures Colin King
2017-05-03 15:49 ` Colin King
2017-05-03 15:58 ` walter harms [this message]
2017-05-03 15:58 ` walter harms
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5909FE21.7050607@bfs.de \
--to=wharms@bfs.de \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.escande@collabora.com \
--cc=weiyongjun1@huawei.com \
--cc=wnhuang@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.