All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, garsilva@embeddedor.com
Cc: ast@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: bpf: remove dead code
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:52:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5922FB28.5070303@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522.103800.1354089494827582585.davem@davemloft.net>

On 05/22/2017 04:38 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
> Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 09:07:46 -0500
>
>> Execution cannot reach NET_IP_ALIGN inside the following statement:
>> ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1409762
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com>
>> ---
>> NOTE: variable ip_align could also be removed and use value 2 directly.
>
> Incorrect.
>
> Some platforms define NET_IP_ALIGN to zero, so the code must remain
> as is.

In the check_pkt_ptr_alignment(), when !strict you would already
return earlier from that function.

So, above test in ip_align will always give 2, meaning technically
the patch is correct, although hard-coded value less clean.

Perhaps something like the below to keep intentions more clear (and
it will get resolved during compile time anyway ...):

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index a098d95..3cf1d60 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -2297,8 +2297,10 @@ static inline int pskb_network_may_pull(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
   * Since this trade off varies between architectures, we allow NET_IP_ALIGN
   * to be overridden.
   */
+#define NET_IP_ALIGN_DEFAULT	2
+
  #ifndef NET_IP_ALIGN
-#define NET_IP_ALIGN	2
+#define NET_IP_ALIGN	NET_IP_ALIGN_DEFAULT
  #endif

  /*
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 1eddb71..61f6aaa 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static int check_pkt_ptr_alignment(const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
  	 * we force this to 2 which is universally what architectures use
  	 * when they don't set CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
  	 */
-	ip_align = strict ? 2 : NET_IP_ALIGN;
+	ip_align = NET_IP_ALIGN ? : NET_IP_ALIGN_DEFAULT;
  	if ((ip_align + reg_off + off) % size != 0) {
  		verbose("misaligned packet access off %d+%d+%d size %d\n",
  			ip_align, reg_off, off, size);

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-22 14:07 [PATCH] kernel: bpf: remove dead code Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-22 14:38 ` David Miller
2017-05-22 14:51   ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-22 14:51     ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2017-05-22 14:52   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2017-05-22 16:27     ` David Miller
2017-05-22 17:00       ` Daniel Borkmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5922FB28.5070303@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=garsilva@embeddedor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.