* can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
@ 2017-06-24 22:21 Hubert Reevez
2017-06-24 23:23 ` Reindl Harald
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsePbzqj7=0BORYGSvQFAOY9SCDAfX1hQmj-8gH2dFj3WA@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Reevez @ 2017-06-24 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi,
I'm trying to add a larger spare in replacement to a smaller one. I'm
really stuck here.... ;(
Here is what I did : --fail /dev/sdc then --remove /dev/sdc
Added the new one (which is also sdc now) can't assemble the new one !
If I try to assemble here is what it comes :
---------------------------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdc is busy - skipping
-------------------------------------------------------
If I tried to stop the array and assemble, here is what it comes :
--------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1.
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 0 of /dev/md0
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 1 of /dev/md0
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 2 of /dev/md0
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 3 of /dev/md0
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 4 of /dev/md0
mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 5 of /dev/md0
mdadm: added /dev/sdc to /dev/md0 as -1
mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives and 1 spare - not enough to
start the array
-------------------------------------------------
Thanks for your help !!!!!
Here some infos (I had a sdg larger than 1,5 to)
------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sd[abcefg] 1500301910016
2000398934016 2000398934016 1500301910016 1500301910016 2000398934016
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : inactive sdf[0] sdc[7](S) sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2]
10255693264 blocks super 1.2
unused devices: <none>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Version : 1.2
Creation Time : Sat Aug 31 01:10:06 2013
Raid Level : raid6
Used Dev Size : 1465137152 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
Raid Devices : 6
Total Devices : 6
Persistence : Superblock is persistent
Update Time : Fri Jun 23 15:43:33 2017
State : active, degraded, Not Started
Active Devices : 5
Working Devices : 6
Failed Devices : 0
Spare Devices : 1
Layout : left-symmetric
Chunk Size : 512K
Name : zetta:0
UUID : 96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
Events : 54841
Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
0 8 80 0 active sync /dev/sdf
1 0 0 1 removed
2 8 0 2 active sync /dev/sda
3 8 64 3 active sync /dev/sde
4 8 16 4 active sync /dev/sdb
6 8 96 5 active sync /dev/sdg
7 8 32 - spare /dev/sdc
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# fdisk -l
Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdd: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12161 cylinders, total 195371568 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x0008101c
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sdd1 * 2048 187367423 93682688 83 Linux
/dev/sdd2 187369470 195371007 4000769 5 Extended
/dev/sdd5 187369472 195371007 4000768 82 Linux swap / Solaris
Disk /dev/sde: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sde doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdf: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdf doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdg: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdg doesn't contain a valid partition table
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
root@Zetta:~# blkid
/dev/sda: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="70983681-b5c2-9f70-1801-948b1b7c97d1" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdb: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="66843575-1a9c-30a6-8172-29f3ded468dc" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sde: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="ee7eab8f-dc90-e3be-146d-a4e09d104418" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdf: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="b2460066-00b1-5070-cfe3-7ac67aae96c1" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdc: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="06bd9fd3-7b1a-b0e0-b9f0-029882f39624" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
/dev/sdd1: UUID="b364f189-c9af-4774-92ba-a49307966cf7" TYPE="ext4"
/dev/sdd5: UUID="c78b6a64-1caa-4290-bc1a-eebe67731ca5" TYPE="swap"
/dev/sdg: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
UUID_SUB="440f9a88-1d42-020c-ba4d-d303afb76c7c" LABEL="zetta:0"
TYPE="linux_raid_member"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mdadm -E /dev/sd[abcefg]
https://pastebin.com/zzz3jFvP
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
mdadm.conf :
DEVICE partitions CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes
HOMEHOST <system> ARRAY /dev/md/zetta:0 metadata=1.2 name=zetta:0
UUID=96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
2017-06-24 22:21 can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk Hubert Reevez
@ 2017-06-24 23:23 ` Reindl Harald
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsePbzqj7=0BORYGSvQFAOY9SCDAfX1hQmj-8gH2dFj3WA@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Reindl Harald @ 2017-06-24 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hubert Reevez, linux-raid
Am 25.06.2017 um 00:21 schrieb Hubert Reevez:
> I'm trying to add a larger spare in replacement to a smaller one. I'm
> really stuck here.... ;(
>
> Here is what I did : --fail /dev/sdc then --remove /dev/sdc
>
> Added the new one (which is also sdc now) can't assemble the new one !
>
> If I try to assemble here is what it comes :
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
> mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
> mdadm: /dev/sdc is busy - skipping
> -------------------------------------------------------
in all cases where i replaced mdadm drives i used "mdadm /dev/md0 --add
/dev/sdc" and never --assemble
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsePbzqj7=0BORYGSvQFAOY9SCDAfX1hQmj-8gH2dFj3WA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2017-06-25 8:15 ` Hubert Reevez
[not found] ` <CAAK+==YbNyjFryhDmJe2Y67rcGzZKvaKX2BaEJzZTuMTN98jRw@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Reevez @ 2017-06-25 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: linux-raid
thanks for all your answers !!!
Never synched, I obviously did -add the first time I rebooted. Never worked
Now I tried to zero superblock sdc : went ok.
mdadm --add /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc mdadm: add new device failed
for /dev/sdc as 7: Invalid argument
I really think it's because of this larger disk for what I red on
http://www.linuxquestions.org :(
Moreover did(n quite understood the size block problem , is it not in
my infos that I have provided ?(512 bytes)
In my previous email I wrote my fdisk -l here :
Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disk identifier: 0x00000000
Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
Is it not the answer you look at to help ?
thanks again...
2017-06-25 0:37 GMT+02:00 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com>:
> Did you actually add it? (--add /dev/mdX /dev/sdc)
>
> Did a resync occur, observable via `cat /proc/mdstat`?
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 15:21 Hubert Reevez <hubereevez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to add a larger spare in replacement to a smaller one. I'm
>> really stuck here.... ;(
>>
>> Here is what I did : --fail /dev/sdc then --remove /dev/sdc
>>
>> Added the new one (which is also sdc now) can't assemble the new one !
>>
>> If I try to assemble here is what it comes :
>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
>> mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
>> mdadm: /dev/sdc is busy - skipping
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> If I tried to stop the array and assemble, here is what it comes :
>>
>> --------------------------------
>>
>> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
>> mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
>> mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1.
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 0 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 1 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 2 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 3 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 4 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 5 of /dev/md0
>> mdadm: added /dev/sdc to /dev/md0 as -1
>> mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives and 1 spare - not enough to
>> start the array
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks for your help !!!!!
>>
>>
>> Here some infos (I had a sdg larger than 1,5 to)
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>> root@Zetta:~# blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sd[abcefg] 1500301910016
>> 2000398934016 2000398934016 1500301910016 1500301910016 2000398934016
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> root@Zetta:~# cat /proc/mdstat
>> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
>> md0 : inactive sdf[0] sdc[7](S) sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2]
>> 10255693264 blocks super 1.2
>>
>> unused devices: <none>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
>> /dev/md0:
>> Version : 1.2
>> Creation Time : Sat Aug 31 01:10:06 2013
>> Raid Level : raid6
>> Used Dev Size : 1465137152 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
>> Raid Devices : 6
>> Total Devices : 6
>> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>>
>> Update Time : Fri Jun 23 15:43:33 2017
>> State : active, degraded, Not Started
>> Active Devices : 5
>> Working Devices : 6
>> Failed Devices : 0
>> Spare Devices : 1
>>
>> Layout : left-symmetric
>> Chunk Size : 512K
>>
>> Name : zetta:0
>> UUID : 96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
>> Events : 54841
>>
>> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> 0 8 80 0 active sync /dev/sdf
>> 1 0 0 1 removed
>> 2 8 0 2 active sync /dev/sda
>> 3 8 64 3 active sync /dev/sde
>> 4 8 16 4 active sync /dev/sdb
>> 6 8 96 5 active sync /dev/sdg
>>
>> 7 8 32 - spare /dev/sdc
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> root@Zetta:~# fdisk -l
>>
>> Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdd: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12161 cylinders, total 195371568 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x0008101c
>>
>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> /dev/sdd1 * 2048 187367423 93682688 83 Linux
>> /dev/sdd2 187369470 195371007 4000769 5 Extended
>> /dev/sdd5 187369472 195371007 4000768 82 Linux swap /
>> Solaris
>>
>> Disk /dev/sde: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sde doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdf: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdf doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdg: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdg doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> root@Zetta:~# blkid
>> /dev/sda: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="70983681-b5c2-9f70-1801-948b1b7c97d1" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> /dev/sdb: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="66843575-1a9c-30a6-8172-29f3ded468dc" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> /dev/sde: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="ee7eab8f-dc90-e3be-146d-a4e09d104418" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> /dev/sdf: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="b2460066-00b1-5070-cfe3-7ac67aae96c1" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> /dev/sdc: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="06bd9fd3-7b1a-b0e0-b9f0-029882f39624" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> /dev/sdd1: UUID="b364f189-c9af-4774-92ba-a49307966cf7" TYPE="ext4"
>> /dev/sdd5: UUID="c78b6a64-1caa-4290-bc1a-eebe67731ca5" TYPE="swap"
>> /dev/sdg: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> UUID_SUB="440f9a88-1d42-020c-ba4d-d303afb76c7c" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> mdadm -E /dev/sd[abcefg]
>>
>> https://pastebin.com/zzz3jFvP
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> mdadm.conf :
>> DEVICE partitions CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes
>> HOMEHOST <system> ARRAY /dev/md/zetta:0 metadata=1.2 name=zetta:0
>> UUID=96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> Jeff Johnson
> Co-Founder
> Aeon Computing
>
> jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com
> www.aeoncomputing.com
> t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845
> m: 619-204-9061
>
> 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117
>
> High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsdDdBVxFuj1S_5vOTNO3KN0mqA+hjbD99Ea53AadXuMFA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2017-06-25 10:10 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 10:35 ` Hubert Reevez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Reevez @ 2017-06-25 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, linux-raid
root@Zetta:~# blockdev --getpbsz /dev/sdc
4096
Idid
mdadm -E /dev/sd[abcefg]
here
https://pastebin.com/zzz3jFvP
the disk was blank
2017-06-25 10:22 GMT+02:00 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com>:
> blockdev --getpbsz /dev/sdc
>
> It looks like you're using 512e drives (4KB w/ 512b emulation)
>
> If sdc won't sync because it's busy something else has control of it.
>
> Is it a blank drive? If there's an old LVM2 vg on it the LVM drivers may be
> reserving the disk. Is device-mapper-multipath running? If so it'll reserve
> the drive and expect you to use whichever /dev/dm* device represents it.
>
> You could also run lsof to see what process has it open.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 01:11 Hubert Reevez <hubereevez@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I did add before assemble ! But mdadm always gave me the same answer.
>>
>> Could you send me more help to check the block ?
>>
>> In my previous email I wrote my fdisk -l here :
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168 sectors
>> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>>
>> Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
>>
>> Is it not the answer you look at to help me ?
>>
>> thanks again...
>>
>> 2017-06-25 1:40 GMT+02:00 Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com>:
>> > I've added/replaced with larger drives several times, no problem. Just
>> > did
>> > it on Thursday.
>> >
>> > Check your new drive to make sure the block size specs are the same.
>> > 512b
>> > blocks versus 4K or 520b if it's SAS with crc block T10 formatting. Use
>> > the
>> > blockdev command or sysfs to check.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 16:15 Hubert Reevez <hubereevez@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> thanks for your answer !!!
>> >>
>> >> tried to zero superblock sdc : went ok.
>> >> mdadm --add /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc mdadm: add new device failed
>> >> for /dev/sdc as 7: Invalid argument
>> >>
>> >> I really think it's because of this larger disk for what I red on
>> >> http://www.linuxquestions.org :(
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> 2017-06-25 0:37 GMT+02:00 Jeff Johnson
>> >> <jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com>:
>> >> > Did you actually add it? (--add /dev/mdX /dev/sdc)
>> >> >
>> >> > Did a resync occur, observable via `cat /proc/mdstat`?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 15:21 Hubert Reevez <hubereevez@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm trying to add a larger spare in replacement to a smaller one.
>> >> >> I'm
>> >> >> really stuck here.... ;(
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is what I did : --fail /dev/sdc then --remove /dev/sdc
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Added the new one (which is also sdc now) can't assemble the new one
>> >> >> !
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If I try to assemble here is what it comes :
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
>> >> >> mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: /dev/sdc is busy - skipping
>> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If I tried to stop the array and assemble, here is what it comes :
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --verbose /dev/sdc
>> >> >> mdadm: looking for devices for /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: /dev/sdc is identified as a member of /dev/md0, slot -1.
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 0 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 1 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 2 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 3 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 4 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: no uptodate device for slot 5 of /dev/md0
>> >> >> mdadm: added /dev/sdc to /dev/md0 as -1
>> >> >> mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives and 1 spare - not enough to
>> >> >> start the array
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks for your help !!!!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here some infos (I had a sdg larger than 1,5 to)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------------
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sd[abcefg] 1500301910016
>> >> >> 2000398934016 2000398934016 1500301910016 1500301910016
>> >> >> 2000398934016
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# cat /proc/mdstat
>> >> >> Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
>> >> >> md0 : inactive sdf[0] sdc[7](S) sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2]
>> >> >> 10255693264 blocks super 1.2
>> >> >>
>> >> >> unused devices: <none>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# mdadm --detail /dev/md0
>> >> >> /dev/md0:
>> >> >> Version : 1.2
>> >> >> Creation Time : Sat Aug 31 01:10:06 2013
>> >> >> Raid Level : raid6
>> >> >> Used Dev Size : 1465137152 (1397.26 GiB 1500.30 GB)
>> >> >> Raid Devices : 6
>> >> >> Total Devices : 6
>> >> >> Persistence : Superblock is persistent
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Update Time : Fri Jun 23 15:43:33 2017
>> >> >> State : active, degraded, Not Started
>> >> >> Active Devices : 5
>> >> >> Working Devices : 6
>> >> >> Failed Devices : 0
>> >> >> Spare Devices : 1
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Layout : left-symmetric
>> >> >> Chunk Size : 512K
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Name : zetta:0
>> >> >> UUID : 96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
>> >> >> Events : 54841
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Number Major Minor RaidDevice State
>> >> >> 0 8 80 0 active sync /dev/sdf
>> >> >> 1 0 0 1 removed
>> >> >> 2 8 0 2 active sync /dev/sda
>> >> >> 3 8 64 3 active sync /dev/sde
>> >> >> 4 8 16 4 active sync /dev/sdb
>> >> >> 6 8 96 5 active sync /dev/sdg
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 7 8 32 - spare /dev/sdc
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# fdisk -l
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sda: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sda doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdb: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdc: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdd: 100.0 GB, 100030242816 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 12161 cylinders, total 195371568
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x0008101c
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>> >> >> /dev/sdd1 * 2048 187367423 93682688 83 Linux
>> >> >> /dev/sdd2 187369470 195371007 4000769 5 Extended
>> >> >> /dev/sdd5 187369472 195371007 4000768 82 Linux swap /
>> >> >> Solaris
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sde: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sde doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdf: 1500.3 GB, 1500301910016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 182401 cylinders, total 2930277168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdf doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdg: 2000.4 GB, 2000398934016 bytes
>> >> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 243201 cylinders, total 3907029168
>> >> >> sectors
>> >> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
>> >> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
>> >> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Disk /dev/sdg doesn't contain a valid partition table
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> root@Zetta:~# blkid
>> >> >> /dev/sda: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="70983681-b5c2-9f70-1801-948b1b7c97d1" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >> /dev/sdb: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="66843575-1a9c-30a6-8172-29f3ded468dc" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >> /dev/sde: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="ee7eab8f-dc90-e3be-146d-a4e09d104418" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >> /dev/sdf: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="b2460066-00b1-5070-cfe3-7ac67aae96c1" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >> /dev/sdc: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="06bd9fd3-7b1a-b0e0-b9f0-029882f39624" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >> /dev/sdd1: UUID="b364f189-c9af-4774-92ba-a49307966cf7" TYPE="ext4"
>> >> >> /dev/sdd5: UUID="c78b6a64-1caa-4290-bc1a-eebe67731ca5" TYPE="swap"
>> >> >> /dev/sdg: UUID="96b0e7b7-83aa-203f-1545-031b43caaa85"
>> >> >> UUID_SUB="440f9a88-1d42-020c-ba4d-d303afb76c7c" LABEL="zetta:0"
>> >> >> TYPE="linux_raid_member"
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> mdadm -E /dev/sd[abcefg]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> https://pastebin.com/zzz3jFvP
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >>
>> >> >> mdadm.conf :
>> >> >> DEVICE partitions CREATE owner=root group=disk mode=0660 auto=yes
>> >> >> HOMEHOST <system> ARRAY /dev/md/zetta:0 metadata=1.2 name=zetta:0
>> >> >> UUID=96b0e7b7:83aa203f:1545031b:43caaa85
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
>> >> >> linux-raid"
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> >> >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > ------------------------------
>> >> > Jeff Johnson
>> >> > Co-Founder
>> >> > Aeon Computing
>> >> >
>> >> > jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com
>> >> > www.aeoncomputing.com
>> >> > t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845
>> >> > m: 619-204-9061
>> >> >
>> >> > 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117
>> >> >
>> >> > High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage
>> >
>> > --
>> > ------------------------------
>> > Jeff Johnson
>> > Co-Founder
>> > Aeon Computing
>> >
>> > jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com
>> > www.aeoncomputing.com
>> > t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845
>> > m: 619-204-9061
>> >
>> > 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117
>> >
>> > High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> Jeff Johnson
> Co-Founder
> Aeon Computing
>
> jeff.johnson@aeoncomputing.com
> www.aeoncomputing.com
> t: 858-412-3810 x1001 f: 858-412-3845
> m: 619-204-9061
>
> 4170 Morena Boulevard, Suite D - San Diego, CA 92117
>
> High-Performance Computing / Lustre Filesystems / Scale-out Storage
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
2017-06-25 10:10 ` Hubert Reevez
@ 2017-06-25 10:35 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 18:32 ` Hubert Reevez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Reevez @ 2017-06-25 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, linux-raid
Thanks to swedenlike on irc linux-raid , I did force -assemble
sd[abefg] then add sdc
Resynching now
root@Zetta:~# mdadm --add /dev/md0 /dev/sdc
mdadm: added /dev/sdc
root@Zetta:~# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid6 sdc[7] sdf[0] sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2]
5860548608 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2
[6/5] [U_UUUU]
[>....................] recovery = 0.0% (582896/1465137152)
finish=209.3min speed=116579K/sec
unused devices: <none>
I will have to get some help to fine tune my mdadm , since it appears
my sdg has a wrong offset (and myabe my sdc will)
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
2017-06-25 10:35 ` Hubert Reevez
@ 2017-06-25 18:32 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 18:55 ` Wols Lists
2017-06-25 23:30 ` Peter Grandi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Hubert Reevez @ 2017-06-25 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson, linux-raid
All seems to went good, but data offset are not equal on sdc and sdg,
should I grow ? or something else ? thanks again
md0 : active raid6 sdf[0] sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2] sdc[7]
5860548608 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
mdadm -E : https://pastebin.com/hs7F5Ppi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
2017-06-25 18:32 ` Hubert Reevez
@ 2017-06-25 18:55 ` Wols Lists
2017-06-25 23:30 ` Peter Grandi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wols Lists @ 2017-06-25 18:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hubert Reevez, Jeff Johnson, linux-raid
On 25/06/17 19:32, Hubert Reevez wrote:
> All seems to went good, but data offset are not equal on sdc and sdg,
> should I grow ? or something else ? thanks again
>
That's normal on an array to which "things have happened".
If you grow or shrink or do other things which need to move data around,
the operation moves the data to a new offset to avoid having to have a
backup file.
And it does this on a per-disk basis, so if you if you change the raid
type, or you add a disk, or you do whole bunch of assorted operations,
the data could end up shuffled back and forth all over the place.
Bottom line - it's expected behaviour, don't worry.
Have you read the raid wiki? I get the impression you're not that au
fait with how raid works - a little bit of study might not go amiss :-)
>
> md0 : active raid6 sdf[0] sdg[6] sdb[4] sde[3] sda[2] sdc[7]
> 5860548608 blocks super 1.2 level 6, 512k chunk, algorithm 2 [6/6] [UUUUUU]
>
>
> mdadm -E : https://pastebin.com/hs7F5Ppi
Cheers,
Wol
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk
2017-06-25 18:32 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 18:55 ` Wols Lists
@ 2017-06-25 23:30 ` Peter Grandi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Peter Grandi @ 2017-06-25 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux RAID
> All seems to went good, but data offset are not equal on sdc
> and sdg, should I grow ? or something else ? thanks again
That "works" if it works, but can be a very dangerous situation
as the space available for data is different on the various RAID
set members, as if the disks were of sligtly different sizes.
http://www.sabi.co.uk/Notes/linuxStor.html#stHintsMD
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-25 23:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-24 22:21 can't add a larger spare for a failed smaller disk Hubert Reevez
2017-06-24 23:23 ` Reindl Harald
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsePbzqj7=0BORYGSvQFAOY9SCDAfX1hQmj-8gH2dFj3WA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-06-25 8:15 ` Hubert Reevez
[not found] ` <CAAK+==YbNyjFryhDmJe2Y67rcGzZKvaKX2BaEJzZTuMTN98jRw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsexbWzffTdouwjQQf0=ZrSx+67c3rWtHcTX9K0nZ5Uuxw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAAK+==Y1h9GPw-5jmtnXKNPP6aYz3ezKre-MKSPvW9Sbjv7hdQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAFCYAsdDdBVxFuj1S_5vOTNO3KN0mqA+hjbD99Ea53AadXuMFA@mail.gmail.com>
2017-06-25 10:10 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 10:35 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 18:32 ` Hubert Reevez
2017-06-25 18:55 ` Wols Lists
2017-06-25 23:30 ` Peter Grandi
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.