All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	<andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Cc: <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	<kernel@stlinux.com>, <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
	<olivier.bideau@st.com>, <amelie.delaunay@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: stm32f4: SDIO & 48Mhz clock management for STM32F469 board
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:06:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5954f521-91ea-b415-99e9-8a73abb88bcb@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45a332b6-5170-9ae3-8d5e-c5f827c3edea@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,


On 11/07/2016 02:55 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> In the stm32f469 soc, the 48Mhz clock could be derived from pll-q or
>> from pll-sai-p.
>>
>> The SDIO clock could be also derived from 48Mhz or from sys clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> index 7641acd..dda15bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  8,    "adc1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  9,    "adc2",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 10,    "adc3",        "apb2_div" },
>> -    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "pll48" },
>> +    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "sdmux" },
>
> I'm confused. How do the "sdmux" clock come to exist on STM32F429?
>
"sdmux" only exist on STM32F469 (struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[])

BR

Gabriel
>
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 12, "spi1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 13,    "spi4",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 14,    "syscfg",    "apb2_div" },
>> @@ -940,6 +940,10 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct 
>> device *dev, const char *name,
>>      "no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>>  };
>>
>> +static const char *pll48_parents[2] = { "pll-q", "pllsai-p" };
>> +
>> +static const char *sdmux_parents[2] = { "pll48", "sys" };
>> +
>>  struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>>      const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
>>      const u64 *gates_map;
>> @@ -1109,6 +1113,18 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct 
>> device_node *np)
>>          goto fail;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32f469-rcc")) {
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "pll48",
>> +                pll48_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(pll48_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 27, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "sdmux",
>> +                sdmux_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(sdmux_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 28, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +    }
>> +
>>      of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
>>      return;
>>  fail:
>>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: gabriel.fernandez@st.com (Gabriel Fernandez)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] clk: stm32f4: SDIO & 48Mhz clock management for STM32F469 board
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:06:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5954f521-91ea-b415-99e9-8a73abb88bcb@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45a332b6-5170-9ae3-8d5e-c5f827c3edea@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,


On 11/07/2016 02:55 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernandez at st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> In the stm32f469 soc, the 48Mhz clock could be derived from pll-q or
>> from pll-sai-p.
>>
>> The SDIO clock could be also derived from 48Mhz or from sys clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> index 7641acd..dda15bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  8,    "adc1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  9,    "adc2",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 10,    "adc3",        "apb2_div" },
>> -    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "pll48" },
>> +    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "sdmux" },
>
> I'm confused. How do the "sdmux" clock come to exist on STM32F429?
>
"sdmux" only exist on STM32F469 (struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[])

BR

Gabriel
>
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 12, "spi1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 13,    "spi4",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 14,    "syscfg",    "apb2_div" },
>> @@ -940,6 +940,10 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct 
>> device *dev, const char *name,
>>      "no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>>  };
>>
>> +static const char *pll48_parents[2] = { "pll-q", "pllsai-p" };
>> +
>> +static const char *sdmux_parents[2] = { "pll48", "sys" };
>> +
>>  struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>>      const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
>>      const u64 *gates_map;
>> @@ -1109,6 +1113,18 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct 
>> device_node *np)
>>          goto fail;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32f469-rcc")) {
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "pll48",
>> +                pll48_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(pll48_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 27, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "sdmux",
>> +                sdmux_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(sdmux_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 28, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +    }
>> +
>>      of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
>>      return;
>>  fail:
>>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
To: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	andrea.merello@gmail.com
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@stlinux.com, ludovic.barre@st.com, olivier.bideau@st.com,
	amelie.delaunay@st.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] clk: stm32f4: SDIO & 48Mhz clock management for STM32F469 board
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 15:06:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5954f521-91ea-b415-99e9-8a73abb88bcb@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <45a332b6-5170-9ae3-8d5e-c5f827c3edea@linaro.org>

Hi Daniel,


On 11/07/2016 02:55 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernandez@st.com wrote:
>> From: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>>
>> In the stm32f469 soc, the 48Mhz clock could be derived from pll-q or
>> from pll-sai-p.
>>
>> The SDIO clock could be also derived from 48Mhz or from sys clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@st.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> index 7641acd..dda15bc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-stm32f4.c
>> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ struct stm32f4_gate_data {
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  8,    "adc1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR,  9,    "adc2",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 10,    "adc3",        "apb2_div" },
>> -    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "pll48" },
>> +    { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 11,    "sdio",        "sdmux" },
>
> I'm confused. How do the "sdmux" clock come to exist on STM32F429?
>
"sdmux" only exist on STM32F469 (struct stm32f4_gate_data stm32f469_gates[])

BR

Gabriel
>
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 12, "spi1",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 13,    "spi4",        "apb2_div" },
>>      { STM32F4_RCC_APB2ENR, 14,    "syscfg",    "apb2_div" },
>> @@ -940,6 +940,10 @@ static struct clk_hw *stm32_register_cclk(struct 
>> device *dev, const char *name,
>>      "no-clock", "lse", "lsi", "hse-rtc"
>>  };
>>
>> +static const char *pll48_parents[2] = { "pll-q", "pllsai-p" };
>> +
>> +static const char *sdmux_parents[2] = { "pll48", "sys" };
>> +
>>  struct stm32f4_clk_data {
>>      const struct stm32f4_gate_data *gates_data;
>>      const u64 *gates_map;
>> @@ -1109,6 +1113,18 @@ static void __init stm32f4_rcc_init(struct 
>> device_node *np)
>>          goto fail;
>>      }
>>
>> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "st,stm32f469-rcc")) {
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "pll48",
>> +                pll48_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(pll48_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 27, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +
>> +        clk_hw_register_mux_table(NULL, "sdmux",
>> +                sdmux_parents, ARRAY_SIZE(sdmux_parents), 0,
>> +                base + STM32F4_RCC_DCKCFGR, 28, 1, 0, NULL,
>> +                &stm32f4_clk_lock);
>> +    }
>> +
>>      of_clk_add_hw_provider(np, stm32f4_rcc_lookup_clk, NULL);
>>      return;
>>  fail:
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-07 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-07 13:05 [PATCH 0/6] Add STM32F4 missing clocks gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add PLL_I2S & PLL_SAI for STM32F429/469 boards gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez-qxv4g6HH51o
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 13:53   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 13:53     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 13:53     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 14:05     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:05       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:05       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:57   ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-07 14:57     ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-08  8:35     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08  8:35       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08  8:35       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08  8:52       ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-08  8:52         ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-08  8:52         ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-08 16:19         ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08 16:19           ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08 16:19           ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-09  8:10           ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-09  8:10             ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-09  8:10             ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-09  8:10             ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-09  9:51             ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-09  9:51               ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-09  9:51               ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: stm32f4: SDIO & 48Mhz clock management for STM32F469 board gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 13:55   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 13:55     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 13:55     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 14:06     ` Gabriel Fernandez [this message]
2016-11-07 14:06       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:06       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 3/6] clk: stm32f4: Add post divisor for I2S & SAI PLLs and Add lcd-tft clock gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 13:48   ` Radosław Pietrzyk
2016-11-07 13:58   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 13:58     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 14:14     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:14       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 14:14       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 4/6] clk: stm32f4: Add I2S clock gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 14:14   ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-07 14:14     ` Daniel Thompson
2016-11-08 16:26     ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08 16:26       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-08 16:26       ` Gabriel Fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 5/6] clk: stm32f4: Add SAI clocks gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com
2016-11-07 13:05 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm: dts: stm32f4: Add external I2S clock gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez
2016-11-07 13:05   ` gabriel.fernandez at st.com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5954f521-91ea-b415-99e9-8a73abb88bcb@st.com \
    --to=gabriel.fernandez@st.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=amelie.delaunay@st.com \
    --cc=andrea.merello@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=olivier.bideau@st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.