Re: [PATCH] f2fs: no need to create issue_discard_thread if it exists

[Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>]

It's fine unless create_discard_cmd_control is used in remount flow in the future.

On 2017/7/6 21:16, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Yunlong,
>
> It looks there is no way to create discard thread redundantly,
> so here we don't need to check this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2017/7/6 19:05, Yunlong Song wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> index 4c246e3..b48d004 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
>> @@ -1417,6 +1417,8 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>  
>>  	if (SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info) {
>>  		dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
>> +		if (dcc->f2fs_issue_discard)
>> +			return err;
>>  		goto init_thread;
>>  	}
>>  
>>
> .
>


-- 
Thanks,
Yunlong Song



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot