All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
	lersek@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	edk2-devel@lists.01.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	tbaicar@codeaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
	zjzhang@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
	john.garry@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com,
	wangzhou1@hisil
Cc: huangshaoyu@huawei.com, wuquanming@huawei.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, zhengqiang10@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69090a96-ce90-4b2b-a419-c8d847d56093@huawei.com>



On 2017/8/25 18:37, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> +
>>> >> +/* From the ACPI 6.1 spec, "18.3.2.9 Hardware Error Notification" */
>>> >> +
>> > It's better to refer to the first spec version of this structure and
>> > same with others you define.
>  do you mean which spec version? the definition is aligned with the linux kernel.
What I mean here is that it's better to refer to the ACPI spec version
which introduces Hardware Error Notification first time.

>> > 
>>> >> +enum AcpiHestNotifyType {
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED = 0,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL = 1,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_LOCAL = 2,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI = 3,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI = 4,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_CMCI = 5,  /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE = 6,   /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO = 7,  /* ACPI 6.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA = 8,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI = 9,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV = 10, /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED = 11  /* 11 and greater are reserved */
>> > In ACPI 6.2, 11 is for Software Delegated Exception, is this useful for
>> > your patchset?
>   it is usefull, for all the error source, I reserved the space for them.
> Because the space is allocated one time, is not dynamically allocated.
> so I use the ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED to specify that there is 11 error source.
> 
I mean whether the new type Software Delegated Exception is useful for
RAS. If so, we could add this new type here.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>, <lersek@redhat.com>,
	<mst@redhat.com>, <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	<peter.maydell@linaro.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	<will.deacon@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<tbaicar@codeaurora.org>, <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	<mingo@kernel.org>, <bp@suse.de>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
	<zjzhang@codeaurora.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@acpica.org>,
	<john.garry@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	<huangdaode@hisilicon.com>, <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>
Cc: <huangshaoyu@huawei.com>, <wuquanming@huawei.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <zhengqiang10@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69090a96-ce90-4b2b-a419-c8d847d56093@huawei.com>



On 2017/8/25 18:37, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> +
>>> >> +/* From the ACPI 6.1 spec, "18.3.2.9 Hardware Error Notification" */
>>> >> +
>> > It's better to refer to the first spec version of this structure and
>> > same with others you define.
>  do you mean which spec version? the definition is aligned with the linux kernel.
What I mean here is that it's better to refer to the ACPI spec version
which introduces Hardware Error Notification first time.

>> > 
>>> >> +enum AcpiHestNotifyType {
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED = 0,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL = 1,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_LOCAL = 2,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI = 3,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI = 4,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_CMCI = 5,  /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE = 6,   /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO = 7,  /* ACPI 6.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA = 8,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI = 9,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV = 10, /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED = 11  /* 11 and greater are reserved */
>> > In ACPI 6.2, 11 is for Software Delegated Exception, is this useful for
>> > your patchset?
>   it is usefull, for all the error source, I reserved the space for them.
> Because the space is allocated one time, is not dynamically allocated.
> so I use the ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED to specify that there is 11 error source.
> 
I mean whether the new type Software Delegated Exception is useful for
RAS. If so, we could add this new type here.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: zhaoshenglong@huawei.com (Shannon Zhao)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69090a96-ce90-4b2b-a419-c8d847d56093@huawei.com>



On 2017/8/25 18:37, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> +
>>> >> +/* From the ACPI 6.1 spec, "18.3.2.9 Hardware Error Notification" */
>>> >> +
>> > It's better to refer to the first spec version of this structure and
>> > same with others you define.
>  do you mean which spec version? the definition is aligned with the linux kernel.
What I mean here is that it's better to refer to the ACPI spec version
which introduces Hardware Error Notification first time.

>> > 
>>> >> +enum AcpiHestNotifyType {
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED = 0,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL = 1,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_LOCAL = 2,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI = 3,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI = 4,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_CMCI = 5,  /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE = 6,   /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO = 7,  /* ACPI 6.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA = 8,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI = 9,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV = 10, /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED = 11  /* 11 and greater are reserved */
>> > In ACPI 6.2, 11 is for Software Delegated Exception, is this useful for
>> > your patchset?
>   it is usefull, for all the error source, I reserved the space for them.
> Because the space is allocated one time, is not dynamically allocated.
> so I use the ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED to specify that there is 11 error source.
> 
I mean whether the new type Software Delegated Exception is useful for
RAS. If so, we could add this new type here.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>, <lersek@redhat.com>,
	<mst@redhat.com>, <imammedo@redhat.com>,
	<peter.maydell@linaro.org>, <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	<qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>,
	<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
	<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	<will.deacon@arm.com>, <james.morse@arm.com>,
	<tbaicar@codeaurora.org>, <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	<mingo@kernel.org>, <bp@suse.de>, <shiju.jose@huawei.com>,
	<zjzhang@codeaurora.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, <devel@acpica.org>,
	<john.garry@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	<huangdaode@hisilicon.com>,
	<wangzhou1@hisil
Cc: <huangshaoyu@huawei.com>, <wuquanming@huawei.com>,
	<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <zhengqiang10@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69090a96-ce90-4b2b-a419-c8d847d56093@huawei.com>



On 2017/8/25 18:37, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> +
>>> >> +/* From the ACPI 6.1 spec, "18.3.2.9 Hardware Error Notification" */
>>> >> +
>> > It's better to refer to the first spec version of this structure and
>> > same with others you define.
>  do you mean which spec version? the definition is aligned with the linux kernel.
What I mean here is that it's better to refer to the ACPI spec version
which introduces Hardware Error Notification first time.

>> > 
>>> >> +enum AcpiHestNotifyType {
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED = 0,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL = 1,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_LOCAL = 2,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI = 3,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI = 4,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_CMCI = 5,  /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE = 6,   /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO = 7,  /* ACPI 6.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA = 8,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI = 9,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV = 10, /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED = 11  /* 11 and greater are reserved */
>> > In ACPI 6.2, 11 is for Software Delegated Exception, is this useful for
>> > your patchset?
>   it is usefull, for all the error source, I reserved the space for them.
> Because the space is allocated one time, is not dynamically allocated.
> so I use the ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED to specify that there is 11 error source.
> 
I mean whether the new type Software Delegated Exception is useful for
RAS. If so, we could add this new type here.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
To: gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@huawei.com>,
	lersek@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	peter.maydell@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	edk2-devel@lists.01.org, christoffer.dall@linaro.org,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	tbaicar@codeaurora.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, bp@suse.de, shiju.jose@huawei.com,
	zjzhang@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org,
	john.garry@huawei.com, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com,
	shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com,
	wangzhou1@hisilicon.com
Cc: huangshaoyu@huawei.com, wuquanming@huawei.com,
	linuxarm@huawei.com, zhengqiang10@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros
Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2017 09:00:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <69090a96-ce90-4b2b-a419-c8d847d56093@huawei.com>



On 2017/8/25 18:37, gengdongjiu wrote:
>>> +
>>> >> +/* From the ACPI 6.1 spec, "18.3.2.9 Hardware Error Notification" */
>>> >> +
>> > It's better to refer to the first spec version of this structure and
>> > same with others you define.
>  do you mean which spec version? the definition is aligned with the linux kernel.
What I mean here is that it's better to refer to the ACPI spec version
which introduces Hardware Error Notification first time.

>> > 
>>> >> +enum AcpiHestNotifyType {
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_POLLED = 0,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_EXTERNAL = 1,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_LOCAL = 2,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SCI = 3,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_NMI = 4,
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_CMCI = 5,  /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_MCE = 6,   /* ACPI 5.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GPIO = 7,  /* ACPI 6.0 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEA = 8,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_SEI = 9,   /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_GSIV = 10, /* ACPI 6.1 */
>>> >> +    ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED = 11  /* 11 and greater are reserved */
>> > In ACPI 6.2, 11 is for Software Delegated Exception, is this useful for
>> > your patchset?
>   it is usefull, for all the error source, I reserved the space for them.
> Because the space is allocated one time, is not dynamically allocated.
> so I use the ACPI_HEST_NOTIFY_RESERVED to specify that there is 11 error source.
> 
I mean whether the new type Software Delegated Exception is useful for
RAS. If so, we could add this new type here.

Thanks,
-- 
Shannon

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-26  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 136+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-18 14:23 [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RAS virtualization support for armv8 SEA and SEI Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23 ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " no-reply
2017-08-18 14:21   ` no-reply
2017-08-18 14:21   ` no-reply
2017-08-18 14:21   ` no-reply
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] ACPI: add APEI/HEST/CPER structures and macros Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 17:18   ` 答复: " gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:18     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:18     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:18   ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-24 12:33   ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 12:33     ` [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 12:33     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 12:33     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-25 10:37     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 10:37       ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 10:37       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 10:37       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 10:37       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:00       ` Shannon Zhao [this message]
2017-08-26  1:00         ` [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:00         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:00         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:00         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:45         ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:45           ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:45           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:45           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:45           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] ACPI: Add APEI GHES Table Generation support Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 17:19   ` 答复: " gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:19     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:19     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:19     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-24 13:03   ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:03     ` [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:03     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:03     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-25 11:20     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  1:08       ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:08         ` [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:08         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:08         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  1:08         ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-26  2:49         ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  2:49           ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  2:49           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  2:49           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-26  2:49           ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-29 10:20   ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2017-08-29 10:20     ` Igor Mammedov
2017-08-29 10:20     ` Igor Mammedov
2017-08-29 10:20     ` Igor Mammedov
2017-08-29 10:20     ` Igor Mammedov
2017-08-29 11:15     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-29 11:15       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-29 11:15       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-29 11:15       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-29 11:15       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01  9:58     ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01  9:58       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01  9:58       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01  9:58       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01  9:58       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-01 11:51       ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-01 11:51         ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-01 11:51         ` Igor Mammedov
2017-09-01 11:51         ` Igor Mammedov
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] ACPI: build and enable APEI GHES in the Makefile and configuration Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-24 13:04   ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:04     ` [Qemu-devel] " Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:04     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-24 13:04     ` Shannon Zhao
2017-08-25 11:20     ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-25 11:20       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] target-arm: kvm64: detect guest RAS EXTENSION feature Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-09-05 17:26   ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:26     ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:26     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:26     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:26     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-06  9:35     ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-06  9:35       ` [Qemu-devel] " gengdongjiu
2017-09-06  9:35       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-06  9:35       ` gengdongjiu
2017-09-06  9:35       ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] target-arm: kvm64: handle SIGBUS signal for synchronous External Abort Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-09-05 17:46   ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:46     ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:46     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:46     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:46     ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-18 14:23 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] target-arm: kvm64: Handle SError interrupt for the guest OS Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` [Qemu-devel] " Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-08-18 14:23   ` Dongjiu Geng
2017-09-05 17:50   ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:50     ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:50     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:50     ` Peter Maydell
2017-09-05 17:50     ` Peter Maydell
2017-08-18 17:17 ` 答复: [PATCH v11 0/6] Add RAS virtualization support for armv8 SEA and SEI gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:17   ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:17   ` gengdongjiu
2017-08-18 17:17 ` gengdongjiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=59A0C813.2060201@huawei.com \
    --to=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=devel@acpica.org \
    --cc=edk2-devel@lists.01.org \
    --cc=gengdongjiu@huawei.com \
    --cc=huangdaode@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=huangshaoyu@huawei.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=shiju.jose@huawei.com \
    --cc=tbaicar@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisil \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=wuquanming@huawei.com \
    --cc=zhengqiang10@huawei.com \
    --cc=zjzhang@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.