From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/IORT: Improve functions return type/storage class specifier indentation
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:19:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59E06910.40404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507824047-17045-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On 2017/10/13 0:00, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Some functions definition indentations are using a style that is frowned
> upon with return value type/storage class specifier in a separate line.
>
> Reindent the function definitions to fix them.
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
By the way, I tested this patch set on D05 with no regressions.
Thanks
Hanjun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: guohanjun@huawei.com (Hanjun Guo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/IORT: Improve functions return type/storage class specifier indentation
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 15:19:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59E06910.40404@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507824047-17045-3-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
On 2017/10/13 0:00, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Some functions definition indentations are using a style that is frowned
> upon with return value type/storage class specifier in a separate line.
>
> Reindent the function definitions to fix them.
Acked-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
By the way, I tested this patch set on D05 with no regressions.
Thanks
Hanjun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-13 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-12 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] ACPI/IORT: Clean-up/rework for v4.15 Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ACPI/IORT: Remove leftover ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_PXM_VALID guard Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ACPI/IORT: Improve functions return type/storage class specifier indentation Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-13 7:19 ` Hanjun Guo [this message]
2017-10-13 7:19 ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-12 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ACPI/IORT: Make platform devices initialization code SMMU agnostic Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 16:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=59E06910.40404@huawei.com \
--to=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.