From: arvindY <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz,
tiwai@suse.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:31:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A12FC64.3020205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120133717.kscrjsb3y7gnvd2t@piout.net>
Hi,
On Monday 20 November 2017 07:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
>> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
>> for zero is not correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> changes in v2 :
>> irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
>> changes in v3 :
>> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
>> changes in v4 :
>> Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
>>
> To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
> -EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
>
> (Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
> nobody cares).
Yes, you are right. We should retry to get an irq for device. But ASoC
driver is not retrying. if platfore_get_irq() fail here, Driver is
throwing an error.
and this patch is only to fix error checking which is not correct in
Driver.
~arvind
>
>> sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
>> struct resource *res;
>> - unsigned int irq;
>> + int irq;
>> int ret;
>>
>> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
>>
>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> - if (!irq)
>> + if (irq <= 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alsa-devel mailing list
>> Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com (arvindY)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:31:40 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A12FC64.3020205@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171120133717.kscrjsb3y7gnvd2t@piout.net>
Hi,
On Monday 20 November 2017 07:07 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 19/11/2017 at 09:45:00 +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
>> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
>> for zero is not correct.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> changes in v2 :
>> irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
>> changes in v3 :
>> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
>> changes in v4 :
>> Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
>>
> To ensure this doesn't get applied: platform_get_irq can return
> -EPROBE_DEFER and this must be handled properly.
>
> (Or maybe this has never caused anything and never failed at all and
> nobody cares).
Yes, you are right. We should retry to get an irq for device. But ASoC
driver is not retrying. if platfore_get_irq() fail here, Driver is
throwing an error.
and this patch is only to fix error checking which is not correct in
Driver.
~arvind
>
>> sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> index bbf7a92..efeecee 100644
>> --- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
>> struct resource *res;
>> - unsigned int irq;
>> + int irq;
>> int ret;
>>
>> info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
>>
>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> - if (!irq)
>> + if (irq <= 0)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alsa-devel mailing list
>> Alsa-devel at alsa-project.org
>> http://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-19 4:15 [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 2/5 v4] ASoC: mt8173: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 3/5 v4] ASoC: nuc900: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 4/5 v3] ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` [PATCH 5/5 v3] ASoC: intel: mfld: " Arvind Yadav
2017-11-19 4:15 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-20 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/5 v4] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Alexandre Belloni
2017-11-20 13:37 ` [alsa-devel] " Alexandre Belloni
2017-11-20 13:37 ` Alexandre Belloni
2017-11-20 16:01 ` arvindY [this message]
2017-11-20 16:01 ` arvindY
2017-11-29 10:53 ` Mark Brown
2017-11-29 10:53 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2017-11-29 10:53 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A12FC64.3020205@gmail.com \
--to=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.