From: arvindY <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
To: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com,
wens@csie.org, mcuos.com@gmail.com, linux@roeck-us.net,
linux@armlinux.org.uk, lee.jones@linaro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10 v5] Input: ep93xx_keypad: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:29:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A1D87E8.3020801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49ba0386f1930f58edfd5ee0f5e65d2a02a46744.1511280261.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for troubling you. I need to push others also. Please share
your review comment.
Thanks,
On Tuesday 21 November 2017 09:41 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes in v2 :
> Return keypad->irq insted of -ENXIO.
> changes in v3 :
> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
> changes in v4 :
> Return -ENXIO insted of keypad->irq. Which was not correct in v3.
> changes in v5 :
> Remove changes of v3 and v4. go back to version v2. Which is correct.
> No need to check for IRQ0 and return keypad->irq insted of -ENXIO.
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> index f77b295..01788a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ static int ep93xx_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> keypad->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (!keypad->irq) {
> - err = -ENXIO;
> + if (keypad->irq < 0) {
> + err = keypad->irq;
> goto failed_free;
> }
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com (arvindY)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 01/10 v5] Input: ep93xx_keypad: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 21:29:36 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A1D87E8.3020801@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49ba0386f1930f58edfd5ee0f5e65d2a02a46744.1511280261.git.arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Hi Dmitry,
Sorry for troubling you. I need to push others also. Please share
your review comment.
Thanks,
On Tuesday 21 November 2017 09:41 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
> The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
> zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
> for zero is not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes in v2 :
> Return keypad->irq insted of -ENXIO.
> changes in v3 :
> Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
> changes in v4 :
> Return -ENXIO insted of keypad->irq. Which was not correct in v3.
> changes in v5 :
> Remove changes of v3 and v4. go back to version v2. Which is correct.
> No need to check for IRQ0 and return keypad->irq insted of -ENXIO.
>
> drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> index f77b295..01788a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/ep93xx_keypad.c
> @@ -257,8 +257,8 @@ static int ep93xx_keypad_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> }
>
> keypad->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (!keypad->irq) {
> - err = -ENXIO;
> + if (keypad->irq < 0) {
> + err = keypad->irq;
> goto failed_free;
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-28 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 16:11 [PATCH 01/10 v5] Input: ep93xx_keypad: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking Arvind Yadav
2017-11-21 16:11 ` Arvind Yadav
2017-11-28 15:59 ` arvindY [this message]
2017-11-28 15:59 ` arvindY
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A1D87E8.3020801@gmail.com \
--to=arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=mcuos.com@gmail.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.