All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: iscsi target regression due to "tcp: remove prequeue support" patch
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 04:28:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A6173F7.2050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118151043.GA21673@breakpoint.cc>

On 01/18/2018 09:10 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> It would indicate users providing their own ->sk_data_ready() callback
>> must be responsible for waking up a kthread context blocked on
>> sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL), when a second ->sk_data_ready() is
>> received before the first sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL) completes.
> 
> I agree, it looks like we need something like this?
> (not even build tested):
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> index b686e2ce9c0e..3723f8f419aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ static void iscsi_target_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
>         if (test_and_set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags)) {
>                 write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>                 pr_debug("Got LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE=1, conn: %p >>>>\n", conn);
> +               if (WARN_ON(iscsi_target_sk_data_ready = conn->orig_data_ready))
> +                       return;
> +               conn->orig_data_ready(sk);
>                 return;

This allows iscsi login to work for me.

I ran it against the target-pending for-next branch.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Christie <mchristi@redhat.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: iscsi target regression due to "tcp: remove prequeue support" patch
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 22:28:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A6173F7.2050905@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180118151043.GA21673@breakpoint.cc>

On 01/18/2018 09:10 AM, Florian Westphal wrote:
>> It would indicate users providing their own ->sk_data_ready() callback
>> must be responsible for waking up a kthread context blocked on
>> sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL), when a second ->sk_data_ready() is
>> received before the first sock_recvmsg(..., MSG_WAITALL) completes.
> 
> I agree, it looks like we need something like this?
> (not even build tested):
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> index b686e2ce9c0e..3723f8f419aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_nego.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,9 @@ static void iscsi_target_sk_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
>         if (test_and_set_bit(LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE, &conn->login_flags)) {
>                 write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
>                 pr_debug("Got LOGIN_FLAGS_READ_ACTIVE=1, conn: %p >>>>\n", conn);
> +               if (WARN_ON(iscsi_target_sk_data_ready == conn->orig_data_ready))
> +                       return;
> +               conn->orig_data_ready(sk);
>                 return;

This allows iscsi login to work for me.

I ran it against the target-pending for-next branch.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-14  5:56 iscsi target regression due to "tcp: remove prequeue support" patch Mike Christie
2018-01-09  6:32 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-09  6:32   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15  6:41   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15  6:41     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15 20:33     ` Mike Christie
2018-01-15 20:33       ` Mike Christie
2018-01-18  8:41       ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-18  8:41         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-15 10:41 ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-18  8:38   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-18  8:38     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2018-01-18 15:10     ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-18 15:10       ` Florian Westphal
2018-01-19  4:28       ` Mike Christie [this message]
2018-01-19  4:28         ` Mike Christie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5A6173F7.2050905@redhat.com \
    --to=mchristi@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.