[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[ge.changwei at h3c.com]

From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>

Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
nothing to do with it. So remove it.

Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
---
 fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
index ec8f758..65f0c54 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
@@ -2331,13 +2331,6 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
 	__dlm_dirty_lockres(dlm, res);
 }
 
-/* if this node is the recovery master, and there are no
- * locks for a given lockres owned by this node that are in
- * either PR or EX mode, zero out the lvb before requesting.
- *
- */
-
-
 static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
 {
 	struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
-- 
2.7.4

[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[piaojun]

Hi changwei,

On 2018/2/23 15:30, ge.changwei at h3c.com wrote:
> From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
This line seems unnecessary, others looks good to me.

thanks,
Jun
> 
> Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
> nothing to do with it. So remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
> ---
>  fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 -------
>  1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> index ec8f758..65f0c54 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
> @@ -2331,13 +2331,6 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>  	__dlm_dirty_lockres(dlm, res);
>  }
>  
> -/* if this node is the recovery master, and there are no
> - * locks for a given lockres owned by this node that are in
> - * either PR or EX mode, zero out the lvb before requesting.
> - *
> - */
> -
> -
>  static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
>  {
>  	struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
> 

[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[Changwei Ge]

Hi Jun,

On 2018/2/23 17:13, piaojun wrote:
> Hi changwei,
> 
> On 2018/2/23 15:30, ge.changwei at h3c.com wrote:
>> From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
> This line seems unnecessary, others looks good to me.
I used git send-email, thus this line was added by parameter --from.
I suppose you could ignore it if it seems strange to you:-)

Thanks,
Changwei

> 
> thanks,
> Jun
>>
>> Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
>> nothing to do with it. So remove it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 -------
>>   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>> index ec8f758..65f0c54 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>> @@ -2331,13 +2331,6 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>>   	__dlm_dirty_lockres(dlm, res);
>>   }
>>   
>> -/* if this node is the recovery master, and there are no
>> - * locks for a given lockres owned by this node that are in
>> - * either PR or EX mode, zero out the lvb before requesting.
>> - *
>> - */
>> -
>> -
>>   static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
>>   {
>>   	struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
>>
> 

[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[piaojun]

Hi Changwei,

On 2018/2/23 17:55, Changwei Ge wrote:
> Hi Jun,
> 
> On 2018/2/23 17:13, piaojun wrote:
>> Hi changwei,
>>
>> On 2018/2/23 15:30, ge.changwei at h3c.com wrote:
>>> From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
>> This line seems unnecessary, others looks good to me.
> I used git send-email, thus this line was added by parameter --from.
> I suppose you could ignore it if it seems strange to you:-)
If this won't affect the patch format, you could add:
Reviewed-by: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>

thanks,
Jun
> 
> Thanks,
> Changwei
> 
>>
>> thanks,
>> Jun
>>>
>>> Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
>>> nothing to do with it. So remove it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
>>> ---
>>>   fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c | 7 -------
>>>   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>>> index ec8f758..65f0c54 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmrecovery.c
>>> @@ -2331,13 +2331,6 @@ static void dlm_free_dead_locks(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
>>>   	__dlm_dirty_lockres(dlm, res);
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> -/* if this node is the recovery master, and there are no
>>> - * locks for a given lockres owned by this node that are in
>>> - * either PR or EX mode, zero out the lvb before requesting.
>>> - *
>>> - */
>>> -
>>> -
>>>   static void dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm, u8 dead_node)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct dlm_lock_resource *res;
>>>
>>
> .
> 

[Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2/dlm: clean unrelated comment

[Joseph Qi]

On 18/2/23 15:30, ge.changwei at h3c.com wrote:
> From: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>
> 
> Obviously, the comment before dlm_do_local_recovery_cleanup() has
> nothing to do with it. So remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@h3c.com>

It seems to say we can no longer trust the lvb in this case. Maybe it
should be placed somewhere to call dlm_revalidate_lvb()?

Anyway, this cleanup looks good to me.
Acked-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@gmail.com>